On Sat, 26 Feb 2005 01:45:49 -0000, "Jon O'Rourke"
wrote:

I see. I would suggest the differences in that area are due to the MetO
image including additional data from the continental radars. The radar mask
from last October's Avbrief images appears identical to the current one
which would indicate nothing's changed in terms of the radar coverage, i.e.
UK data only. If there were major differences over the UK then it may need
looking at a bit more closely.

Jon, the mask may be unchanged but the extent of coverage has shrunk
within the mask. Whatever the reason, radar coverage that stops 5
miles off the South Kent coast is deficient and it wasn't like that
until recently. It's avbrief's problem so if it persists, I'll report
it to them; thanks for your input.

Cheers from a clear and frosty Fareham at -1 to -2 degrees C, hoping
for some whiter stuff than hoar frost later tonight

--
Dave

On Sat, 26 Feb 2005 01:45:49 -0000, "Jon O'Rourke"
wrote:

I see. I would suggest the differences in that area are due to the MetO
image including additional data from the continental radars. The radar mask
from last October's Avbrief images appears identical to the current one
which would indicate nothing's changed in terms of the radar coverage, i.e.
UK data only. If there were major differences over the UK then it may need
looking at a bit more closely.

Jon, the mask may be unchanged but the extent of coverage has shrunk
within the mask. Whatever the reason, radar coverage that stops 5
miles off the South Kent coast is deficient and it wasn't like that
until recently. It's avbrief's problem so if it persists, I'll report
it to them; thanks for your input.

Cheers from a clear and frosty Fareham at -1 to -2 degrees C, hoping
for some whiter stuff than hoar frost later tonight

--
Dave

On Sat, 26 Feb 2005 01:45:49 -0000, "Jon O'Rourke"
wrote:

I see. I would suggest the differences in that area are due to the MetO
image including additional data from the continental radars. The radar mask
from last October's Avbrief images appears identical to the current one
which would indicate nothing's changed in terms of the radar coverage, i.e.
UK data only. If there were major differences over the UK then it may need
looking at a bit more closely.

Jon, the mask may be unchanged but the extent of coverage has shrunk
within the mask. Whatever the reason, radar coverage that stops 5
miles off the South Kent coast is deficient and it wasn't like that
until recently. It's avbrief's problem so if it persists, I'll report
it to them; thanks for your input.

Cheers from a clear and frosty Fareham at -1 to -2 degrees C, hoping
for some whiter stuff than hoar frost later tonight

--
Dave

"Dave Ludlow" wrote in message
news
Dave, have a look at the 2130Z Avbrief image, my guess is it won't be
showing the precip. in the eastern English Channel which is being picked
up on the continental radar and being added to displays that use that
data, i.e the MetO ones. It would appear to me that the Chenies radar is
probably
overshooting the precip. It's not a fault, just the way it is.

Jon.


--
Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG

"Dave Ludlow" wrote in message
news
Dave, have a look at the 2130Z Avbrief image, my guess is it won't be
showing the precip. in the eastern English Channel which is being picked
up on the continental radar and being added to displays that use that
data, i.e the MetO ones. It would appear to me that the Chenies radar is
probably
overshooting the precip. It's not a fault, just the way it is.

Jon.


--
Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG

"Dave Ludlow" wrote in message
news
Dave, have a look at the 2130Z Avbrief image, my guess is it won't be
showing the precip. in the eastern English Channel which is being picked
up on the continental radar and being added to displays that use that
data, i.e the MetO ones. It would appear to me that the Chenies radar is
probably
overshooting the precip. It's not a fault, just the way it is.

Jon.


--
Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG

"Dave Ludlow" wrote in message
news
Dave, have a look at the 2130Z Avbrief image, my guess is it won't be
showing the precip. in the eastern English Channel which is being picked
up on the continental radar and being added to displays that use that
data, i.e the MetO ones. It would appear to me that the Chenies radar is
probably
overshooting the precip. It's not a fault, just the way it is.

Jon.


--
Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG

"Jon O Rourke" wrote in message
news:7a0c6f4709a95a52591b6bf571e59671.62236@mygate .mailgate.org

"Dave Ludlow" wrote in message
news
Dave, have a look at the 2130Z Avbrief image, my guess is it won't be
showing the precip. in the eastern English Channel which is being picked
up on the continental radar and being added to displays that use that
data, i.e the MetO ones. It would appear to me that the Chenies radar is
probably
overshooting the precip. It's not a fault, just the way it is.

Jon.


In saying that I'm not completely happy with the data Chenies is
providing and it will be investigated.

Jon.


--
Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG

"Jon O Rourke" wrote in message
news:7a0c6f4709a95a52591b6bf571e59671.62236@mygate .mailgate.org

"Dave Ludlow" wrote in message
news
Dave, have a look at the 2130Z Avbrief image, my guess is it won't be
showing the precip. in the eastern English Channel which is being picked
up on the continental radar and being added to displays that use that
data, i.e the MetO ones. It would appear to me that the Chenies radar is
probably
overshooting the precip. It's not a fault, just the way it is.

Jon.


In saying that I'm not completely happy with the data Chenies is
providing and it will be investigated.

Jon.


--
Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG

"Jon O Rourke" wrote in message
news:7a0c6f4709a95a52591b6bf571e59671.62236@mygate .mailgate.org

"Dave Ludlow" wrote in message
news
Dave, have a look at the 2130Z Avbrief image, my guess is it won't be
showing the precip. in the eastern English Channel which is being picked
up on the continental radar and being added to displays that use that
data, i.e the MetO ones. It would appear to me that the Chenies radar is
probably
overshooting the precip. It's not a fault, just the way it is.

Jon.


In saying that I'm not completely happy with the data Chenies is
providing and it will be investigated.

Jon.


--
Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG