On 02/09/2016 05:24, wrote:

7.1 off NZ.


Why wouldn't we miss it - this is a meteorology group, not a geology one!


--

Paul Hyett, Cheltenham

On Friday, 2 September 2016 06:48:22 UTC+1, vidcapper wrote:
On 02/09/2016 05:24, wrote:

7.1 off NZ.


Why wouldn't we miss it - this is a meteorology group, not a geology one!


--

Paul Hyett, Cheltenham

Nail; head. 😀

On Friday, 2 September 2016 06:48:22 UTC+1, vidcapper wrote:
On 02/09/2016 05:24, wrote:

7.1 off NZ.


Why wouldn't we miss it - this is a meteorology group, not a geology one!

Surely the point is that someone who has just admitted to an attack of semi-blindness could rely on anyone with more sense than a wet sheep to pay more than the usual attention to his own needs than a wet sheep would?

Be that as it may has anyone hear with a touch of tinnitus caught the signal from here yet:
https://www.volcanodiscovery.com/volcano_news.html

Now would be a good time to remind the forum that eating wet sheep can be a perilous activity of the spongiformance:

https://weathercharts.wordpress.com/...3/cannibalism/

On Friday, 2 September 2016 06:48:22 UTC+1, vidcapper wrote:

Why wouldn't we miss it - this is a meteorology group, not a geology one!

This is currently showing what an analysis weather chart indicates when a recent VEI-2 has taken place:

http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/public/w...ime=1472817600

Note the short warm fronts and the increased number of pressure centres. It isn't veterinary science. So no excuses for flies on you. What had you previously thought they were?

Indicative of starry nights and sunny days or something?
Related to Arctic squalls in some way?
Really, what?

On Saturday, 3 September 2016 13:50:20 UTC+1, Weatherlawyer wrote:
On Friday, 2 September 2016 06:48:22 UTC+1, vidcapper wrote:

Why wouldn't we miss it - this is a meteorology group, not a geology one!

This is currently showing what an analysis weather chart indicates when a recent VEI-2 has taken place:

http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/public/w...ime=1472817600

Note the short warm fronts and the increased number of pressure centres. It isn't veterinary science. So no excuses for flies on you. What had you previously thought they were?

Indicative of starry nights and sunny days or something?
Related to Arctic squalls in some way?
Really, what?

Oh the wonderful clarity provided by hindsight yet again. Forecasts do tend to come *before* the event, or is that one lost one you?

1/18 = guesswork based upon idiocy, masked deliberately in gobbledygook. It never goes well for a charlatan when someone bothers to monitor their forecasts. See piers, madden etc.

On Wednesday, 24 August 2016 20:01:22 UTC+1, Weatherlawyer wrote:
On Wednesday, 24 August 2016 18:32:42 UTC+1, wrote:
On Wednesday, 24 August 2016 18:24:10 UTC+2, Weatherlawyer wrote:


Sounds like it is endemic and not just the Cols and Richard Dixons of this world who are more than a touch dawlish:


Wow, I get a mention!!
For what do I deserve this incredible honour?

For not being a racist despite an appetite for rain and wet grass. Besides you keep getting up despite me knocking you down all the time. There is something to be said for someone that gormless. (Your very stupid!)

But on with the game. The Met Office in its wisdom has derided that the Great British Pubic, now that we are once again on our own. is ready for Jet Streams

Which puts us in the same boat vis a vis the Canadians as the USA has been in since Presidunce Arthur the man who single-handedly put an end to the cowboy era outside of hollywood:

"General Hazen first misrepresents, and then proceeds to demolish the shadow of his own creation.

I did not say that the storm will cross eastward over the Rocky Mountains. On the contrary, it will originate in the "Northern Pacific" and will proceed directly westward, in an opposite direction, and will reach the Rocky Mountains from the east after having passed round the world.

This may seem astounding to the general but astronomers treat of the causes while
meteorologists treat only of the effects.

A stratum of atmosphere covering half the continent might move from these mountains to the Atlantic, and the fact be unknown if moving in a plane one or two miles above the earth's surface. The last transit of Venus, Dec. 6th, 1882,

afforded the most positive proof as to the scientific reliability of my theory of continental storms."

Although he had not grasped the concept of cold fronts being synonymous with the volcanic activity; he had no way of knowing, always follows storms this Canadian had a good grasp of planetary waves even if he did overly dramaticise his weather forecasts.

https://archive.org/details/cihm_25726

Put it in context: How alarmist would I have had to have been when I noticed that the dart-boarding pointed out to me by Bjorn Soerheim on this group, just prior to the Boxing Day disaster in 2004 had the scale of earthquake I failed to forecast, to gain enough traction to save even one person?

He stopped issuing forecasts but 1883 was the start of the Little Ice-Age (since hidden or played down by the flowerpotmen) and was the year that krakatau blew up.

I failed to point out the contra-rotations that he stated would be visible from the charts now available furthermore they are fairly easily explained.

But has Dawlish ever showed his face now that his Presidunce has been deposed. Richardson said it correctly that And little whorls have lesser whorls,
And so on to viscosity.

But bigger curls have oval curls and exit at velocity. Has Dawlish stayed or has he strayed, where is the foul monstrosity?

I saw a chart I thought I should comment now that I have managed to open the Met Office's North Atlantic charts at last. I want to celebrate.

Anyone know id the scion of the flowerpottery has had to run away before he ended up in GITMO?