|
MetO voting again on industrial action
On Tuesday, 26 January 2016 20:19:54 UTC, wrote:
"Tudor Hughes" wrote in message ... On Monday, 25 January 2016 18:58:10 UTC, Desperate Dan wrote: You're letting him off too lightly. He may be a lot of things but a "gentleman", isn't one of them! Thank you, Dawlish. Or are you just a friend of his? Can't be many of those so that's a tremendous sacrifice you've made. Well done. Hi Tudor. Desperate Dan is definitely *not* Dawlish. He is a current employee of the Met Office and as such is running a very fine line indeed. He needs to be careful his cover does not get blown, considering some of the things (about the MetO) he has said publicly. http://www.lyneside.demon.co.uk/Hayt...antage_Pro.htm Someone said that they are only paid 30000/year. For someone with a degree in the sciences that is poor pay if it wasn't for the CV they could get twice that salary in engineering if they had had better guidance on leaving school. |
MetO voting again on industrial action
On Monday, 25 January 2016 18:54:41 UTC, Desperate Dan wrote:
Read your original post that caused all these comments. It's completely unjustifiable and the language you used completely unacceptable. Your posts that followed where you comment on the bad manners of other individuals are unbelievable! Take a look at yourself and do the right thing. You may, then, regain some self respect. **** off, Danny boy - you're not helpful. We're trying to get rid of the **** dawlish (or is it the dawl ****ish). You know who I mean - that bald **** who knows **** all about weather and has the uncanny knack of rubbing everybody up the wrong way not just here but everywhere he goes which is why he is banned from other weather groups. They didn't want to be wrecked by this arsehole, this complete *******, and took appropriate action. Any way I shall be watching the mayhem here with interest and if I've got anything to say about the weather it will go into one of those Dawlish-free zones. I'm not banned, you see, unlike Paul ****ing Garvey, because there are simply no provocations and one acts normally and can concentrate on the subject. They're like oases, these places, tranquil, cool and stimulating. Nobody is rude and one follows the etiquette. Do you detect a bit of demob-happy? You're right. I am simply *not* going to be continually insulted by an ignoramus with a gross personality defect. I can't stop him and I can't get rid of him. Staying here and seeing the place wrecked is very tiring and just not worth the candle. Keep an eye on him; you know what he's like - he's got a tremendous amount of Previous. A good kicking wouldn't come amiss. It's supposed to work with bullies - I wouldn't know. hughes |
MetO voting again on industrial action
That sounds like a threat! I can't think of any occasion that I've been overly critical of the Met Office. I've been very critical of the Met Office Prospect reps that agreed to role pay and everything attached to that. I don't mind you pontificating about forecasting but when you start standing shoulder-to-shoulder with the workers then you really need to be reminded of a few things. I think you know what I mean.
|
MetO voting again on industrial action
You could just ignore him, I do, just as I ignore some others. What he and Larry have to say to each other isn't relevant to me, in the same way that the racists aren't so I don't read their posts.
|
MetO voting again on industrial action
On Tuesday, January 26, 2016 at 10:45:07 PM UTC, dawlish wrote:
You'll be saying soon that your whole life is blighted by one man.....or wold poverty, or epidemics are caused by one man. Perhaps I should be blamed for the 21st Century? Your obsession is painful and ridiculous. To suggest I post as someone else is just insane. Please leave the Wolds out of this, stick to Dawlish and totally unnecessary to not capitalise it either. |
MetO voting again on industrial action
On Wednesday, January 27, 2016 at 4:26:08 AM UTC, Tudor Hughes wrote:
On Monday, 25 January 2016 18:54:41 UTC, Desperate Dan wrote: Read your original post that caused all these comments. It's completely unjustifiable and the language you used completely unacceptable. Your posts that followed where you comment on the bad manners of other individuals are unbelievable! Take a look at yourself and do the right thing. You may, then, regain some self respect. **** off, Danny boy - you're not helpful. We're trying to get rid of the **** dawlish (or is it the dawl ****ish). hughes Oddly, it hasn't worked, has it, hughes? But good of you to admit (again) that you are a part of a group who are trying such a thing. It's so strange that somehow I bully so many people, when there is just one of me and a crew of you. Good riddance. After your utterly foul and pathetic angry outburst there are few who will miss you. |
| All times are GMT. The time now is 11:43 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2006 WeatherBanter.co.uk