MetO voting again on industrial action
 

On Monday, 25 January 2016 11:42:50 UTC, Richard Dixon wrote:
On Monday, 25 January 2016 10:32:57 UTC, wrote:

Prolonging an argument is like allowing somebody to live rent-free in your
head.

I find him a terrific character study. You could imagine Alan Bennett casting him as a Talking Heads persona.

Richard

Played by Thora Hird, Mel Torme's old mother in law. You Hird it here.

MetO voting again on industrial action
 

On Mon, 25 Jan 2016 08:57:27 -0000
"Anne B" wrote:

Anne Tudor is a gentleman

What an odd name for a man.

I will do him the courtesy of saying that he probably had not
thought about the use of that word from a woman's point of view.
Now that it has been brought to his attention, I hope that,
being as you say a gentleman, he will avoid using it in that way
in future.


I filter out posts from certain contributors to this group, but I get
to see their nonsense if quotes are unattributed; will you please try
to leave the writers name as part of your quotes in future, please?

MetO voting again on industrial action
 

On Monday, 25 January 2016 12:42:54 UTC, Gareth wrote:
On Mon, 25 Jan 2016 08:57:27 -0000
"Anne B" wrote:

Anne Tudor is a gentleman

What an odd name for a man.

I will do him the courtesy of saying that he probably had not
thought about the use of that word from a woman's point of view.
Now that it has been brought to his attention, I hope that,
being as you say a gentleman, he will avoid using it in that way
in future.


I filter out posts from certain contributors to this group, but I get
to see their nonsense if quotes are unattributed; will you please try
to leave the writers name as part of your quotes in future, please?





Graham.

I was referring to Henry VIII's second wife.




Not......................

MetO voting again on industrial action
 

On Monday, 25 January 2016 10:13:12 UTC, Richard Dixon wrote:
On Sunday, 24 January 2016 22:56:21 UTC, Lawrence Jenkins wrote:

Call him and his fellows anything you like that doesn't use the
names of female body parts as an insult to a male. You have ably
demonstrated that there is an ample supply of such alternative
words.

Anne

Anne Tudor is a gentleman (if that descriptive term is allowed to exist in this new world) and he only slipped into the vernacular because of one person.

The same I seem to recall happening with perma-mild-mannered Mike Tullett. Odd that, isn't. And strange that the perpetrator would never ever wonder to himself "Why do I rub so many people up the wrong way"?

Richard

There we are. All over. I think we can safely say that the troll is out of c... never mind

MetO voting again on industrial action
 

On Monday, 25 January 2016 07:00:23 UTC, dawlish wrote:
Still posting? You have no shame.

And you feel any foul language is perfectly acceptable, if you don't like the person against whom you are directing it. There are no boundaries any more for you Hughes, are there?

Talk about losing the plot. Control yourself if you continue to post here would be my advice and you'd do well to take it.

This from the person who is the source of *all* the rudeness on this group. This place becomes tranquil when you're not here. Note that - you know it's true from your lurking. Such brass-necked cheek is almost comic.

"Would that God the giftie gi'e us to see ourselves as others see us". Most adults get somewhere near that, but not you, who seems emotionally stuck at the age of about 6 and a horrible little brat to boot. "I'm sure he'll grow out of it" affirms the nice doctor. Well, not yet, quite.

Tudor Hughes.

MetO voting again on industrial action
 

On Monday, 25 January 2016 07:00:23 UTC, dawlish wrote:
Still posting? You have no shame.

And you feel any foul language is perfectly acceptable, if you don't like the person against whom you are directing it. There are no boundaries any more for you Hughes, are there?

Talk about losing the plot. Control yourself if you continue to post here would be my advice and you'd do well to take it.

Oh, and another point. Spelling my name with a capital is not enough. Nobody on this site addresses people by their surname because they know it's rude and demeaning and creates bad feeling. But you do it *because* it's rude and demeaning, your default attitude to humanity. That's the difference.

Tudor Hughes.

MetO voting again on industrial action
 

On Monday, January 25, 2016 at 5:51:08 PM UTC, Tudor Hughes wrote:
On Monday, 25 January 2016 07:00:23 UTC, dawlish wrote:
Still posting? You have no shame.

And you feel any foul language is perfectly acceptable, if you don't like the person against whom you are directing it. There are no boundaries any more for you Hughes, are there?

Talk about losing the plot. Control yourself if you continue to post here would be my advice and you'd do well to take it.

This from the person who is the source of *all* the rudeness on this group. This place becomes tranquil when you're not here. Note that - you know it's true from your lurking. Such brass-necked cheek is almost comic.

"Would that God the giftie gi'e us to see ourselves as others see us". Most adults get somewhere near that, but not you, who seems emotionally stuck at the age of about 6 and a horrible little brat to boot. "I'm sure he'll grow out of it" affirms the nice doctor. Well, not yet, quite.

Tudor Hughes.

"rude' to someone like you, hughes, is calling someone an idiot, or spelling you name without a capital letter. Posting in a way that you should be so ashamed as to leave the group permanently is like this:

**No, hughes is going to step in and call you a pompous patronising arrogant ****er. Paul ****ing Garvey, **** of the decade, destroyer of forums, at least those unable to sluice him out. Meteorological dilettante out of his depth. Friendless phony. Bull****ter of the first order. You're in the right job, aren't you, ****-face? I've never seen such an avalanche of waffle.
I've got other places to go but you haven't, have you, you ill-mannered ****? Ever thought why, thunder****? (I am indebted to a USW member for this splendid epithet, le mot juste).
If these discussions took place in real life you'd tone it down quite a lot, I reckon, or you'd be in A&E in no time, you ****ty little coward. But no big fist is going to come shooting out of a screen, is it, worm?
People often ask "what's the matter with him". Nothing wrong with him, he's just a complete ****.

Tudor Hughes.**

See the difference?

Actually, you don't, do you? You feel it is perfectly OK to write barrel-scrapingly, foul-mouthed, offensive dreadfulness like this, because it is aimed at me.

See how you justify your actions? Time for you to take a break, hughes. You are out of any normal control.

MetO voting again on industrial action
 

Read your original post that caused all these comments. It's completely unjustifiable and the language you used completely unacceptable. Your posts that followed where you comment on the bad manners of other individuals are unbelievable! Take a look at yourself and do the right thing. You may, then, regain some self respect.

MetO voting again on industrial action
 

You're letting him off too lightly. He may be a lot of things but a "gentleman", isn't one of them!

MetO voting again on industrial action
 

On Monday, 25 January 2016 18:58:10 UTC, Desperate Dan wrote:
You're letting him off too lightly. He may be a lot of things but a "gentleman", isn't one of them!

Oh no garvey has dusted off desperate dan in a sad attempt to garner support.

Sock and puppet do I detect.