On Saturday, 23 January 2016 13:01:45 UTC, dawlish wrote:
On Saturday, January 23, 2016 at 11:27:58 AM UTC, Col wrote:
On 23/01/2016 08:57, dawlish wrote:
On Friday, January 22, 2016 at 10:13:17 PM UTC, Tudor Hughes wrote:
On Friday, 22 January 2016 20:35:20 UTC, dawlish wrote:

You missed my irony, Scott. Teaching is an incredibly difficult job, beyond most in the MetO.

Especially with some ******* from OFSTED watching your every move.

Tudor Hughes.

You can never control your mouth, can you, hughes?

Inspection is necessary, to get the best deal possible for kids, but teaching is an amazingly complex and difficult job; as I said, far beyond most in the MetO. However, the pay may be comparable to teachers, after 10 years in the job, so why don't the MetO strikers who've decided decided their lot is not good enough, leave and re-train as maths and science teachers? If they are good enough, the teaching profession would love to have them........but they would have to be good enough. Pay teachers more; they do an incredible job, as do junior doctors in the NHS.

How patronising!
Isn't meteorology 'an amazingly complex and difficult job'?
This is bourne out by how few times you dare to forecast at 10 days.

--
Col

Bolton, Lancashire
160m asl
Snow videos:
http://www.youtube.com/channel/UC3QvmL4UWBmHFMKWiwYm_gg

Patronising, but absolutely spot on. The MetO do not issue a forecast at 10 days for the general public, apart from a 6-15 day forecast, which is bland and general. Neither do they analyse any of their 6-15 day forecasts, so we have no idea of their accuracy. I think that actually puts me ahead in that one respect, don't you?

Meteorology, is in no way as difficult as teaching, I can assure you! Again, you are conflating two completely different things. Twice in a day.

You are upset. Calm down and think before you post, Col. 🤔🤔 I'm sure mitchell will step in here and criticise your spelling.......

No, hughes is going to step in and call you a pompous patronising arrogant ****er. Paul ****ing Garvey, **** of the decade, destroyer of forums, at least those unable to sluice him out. Meteorological dilettante out of his depth. Friendless phony. Bull****ter of the first order. You're in the right job, aren't you, ****-face? I've never seen such an avalanche of waffle.
I've got other places to go but you haven't, have you, you ill-mannered ****? Ever thought why, thunder****? (I am indebted to a USW member for this splendid epithet, le mot juste).
If these discussions took place in real life you'd tone it down quite a lot, I reckon, or you'd be in A&E in no time, you ****ty little coward. But no big fist is going to come shooting out of a screen, is it, worm?
People often ask "what's the matter with him". Nothing wrong with him, he's just a complete ****.

Tudor Hughes.

On Saturday, 23 January 2016 20:29:54 UTC, Tudor Hughes wrote:
On Saturday, 23 January 2016 13:01:45 UTC, dawlish wrote:
On Saturday, January 23, 2016 at 11:27:58 AM UTC, Col wrote:
On 23/01/2016 08:57, dawlish wrote:
On Friday, January 22, 2016 at 10:13:17 PM UTC, Tudor Hughes wrote:
On Friday, 22 January 2016 20:35:20 UTC, dawlish wrote:

You missed my irony, Scott. Teaching is an incredibly difficult job, beyond most in the MetO.

Especially with some ******* from OFSTED watching your every move.

Tudor Hughes.

You can never control your mouth, can you, hughes?

Inspection is necessary, to get the best deal possible for kids, but teaching is an amazingly complex and difficult job; as I said, far beyond most in the MetO. However, the pay may be comparable to teachers, after 10 years in the job, so why don't the MetO strikers who've decided decided their lot is not good enough, leave and re-train as maths and science teachers? If they are good enough, the teaching profession would love to have them........but they would have to be good enough. Pay teachers more; they do an incredible job, as do junior doctors in the NHS.

How patronising!
Isn't meteorology 'an amazingly complex and difficult job'?
This is bourne out by how few times you dare to forecast at 10 days.

--
Col

Bolton, Lancashire
160m asl
Snow videos:
http://www.youtube.com/channel/UC3QvmL4UWBmHFMKWiwYm_gg

Patronising, but absolutely spot on. The MetO do not issue a forecast at 10 days for the general public, apart from a 6-15 day forecast, which is bland and general. Neither do they analyse any of their 6-15 day forecasts, so we have no idea of their accuracy. I think that actually puts me ahead in that one respect, don't you?

Meteorology, is in no way as difficult as teaching, I can assure you! Again, you are conflating two completely different things. Twice in a day.

You are upset. Calm down and think before you post, Col. 🤔🤔 I'm sure mitchell will step in here and criticise your spelling......

No, hughes is going to step in and call you a pompous patronising arrogant ****er. Paul ****ing Garvey, **** of the decade, destroyer of forums, at least those unable to sluice him out. Meteorological dilettante out of his depth. Friendless phony. Bull****ter of the first order. You're in the right job, aren't you, ****-face? I've never seen such an avalanche of waffle.
I've got other places to go but you haven't, have you, you ill-mannered ****? Ever thought why, thunder****? (I am indebted to a USW member for this splendid epithet, le mot juste).
If these discussions took place in real life you'd tone it down quite a lot, I reckon, or you'd be in A&E in no time, you ****ty little coward. But no big fist is going to come shooting out of a screen, is it, worm?
People often ask "what's the matter with him". Nothing wrong with him, he's just a complete ****.

Tudor Hughes.



Bloody hell Tudor, steady on with the "worm " stuff, tad strong that.

On Saturday, 23 January 2016 20:29:54 UTC, Tudor Hughes wrote:
On Saturday, 23 January 2016 13:01:45 UTC, dawlish wrote:
On Saturday, January 23, 2016 at 11:27:58 AM UTC, Col wrote:
On 23/01/2016 08:57, dawlish wrote:
On Friday, January 22, 2016 at 10:13:17 PM UTC, Tudor Hughes wrote:
On Friday, 22 January 2016 20:35:20 UTC, dawlish wrote:

You missed my irony, Scott. Teaching is an incredibly difficult job, beyond most in the MetO.

Especially with some ******* from OFSTED watching your every move.

Tudor Hughes.

You can never control your mouth, can you, hughes?

Inspection is necessary, to get the best deal possible for kids, but teaching is an amazingly complex and difficult job; as I said, far beyond most in the MetO. However, the pay may be comparable to teachers, after 10 years in the job, so why don't the MetO strikers who've decided decided their lot is not good enough, leave and re-train as maths and science teachers? If they are good enough, the teaching profession would love to have them........but they would have to be good enough. Pay teachers more; they do an incredible job, as do junior doctors in the NHS.

How patronising!
Isn't meteorology 'an amazingly complex and difficult job'?
This is bourne out by how few times you dare to forecast at 10 days.

--
Col

Bolton, Lancashire
160m asl
Snow videos:
http://www.youtube.com/channel/UC3QvmL4UWBmHFMKWiwYm_gg

Patronising, but absolutely spot on. The MetO do not issue a forecast at 10 days for the general public, apart from a 6-15 day forecast, which is bland and general. Neither do they analyse any of their 6-15 day forecasts, so we have no idea of their accuracy. I think that actually puts me ahead in that one respect, don't you?

Meteorology, is in no way as difficult as teaching, I can assure you! Again, you are conflating two completely different things. Twice in a day.

You are upset. Calm down and think before you post, Col. 🤔🤔 I'm sure mitchell will step in here and criticise your spelling......

No, hughes is going to step in and call you a pompous patronising arrogant ****er. Paul ****ing Garvey, **** of the decade, destroyer of forums, at least those unable to sluice him out. Meteorological dilettante out of his depth. Friendless phony. Bull****ter of the first order. You're in the right job, aren't you, ****-face? I've never seen such an avalanche of waffle.
I've got other places to go but you haven't, have you, you ill-mannered ****? Ever thought why, thunder****? (I am indebted to a USW member for this splendid epithet, le mot juste).
If these discussions took place in real life you'd tone it down quite a lot, I reckon, or you'd be in A&E in no time, you ****ty little coward. But no big fist is going to come shooting out of a screen, is it, worm?
People often ask "what's the matter with him". Nothing wrong with him, he's just a complete ****.

Tudor Hughes.

Wow! Time for an early night, these upsets all seem to occur around this time for some reason. Not enough sunlight maybe?

what I would suggest for the future is that if you can't refrain then just sock puppet him with old posts and idiocies. I am sure that you can find a few meteorological thought inflictors that will upset him if you craft them insincerely enough.

That way we can all have a laugh and turn the tide a little. But I would suggest you spend a few days down the pub rather than in front of the computer in case you do do something silly.

On Saturday, 23 January 2016 08:57:19 UTC, dawlish wrote:
On Friday, January 22, 2016 at 10:13:17 PM UTC, Tudor Hughes wrote:
On Friday, 22 January 2016 20:35:20 UTC, dawlish wrote:

You missed my irony, Scott. Teaching is an incredibly difficult job, beyond most in the MetO.

Especially with some ******* from OFSTED watching your every move.

Tudor Hughes.

You can never control your mouth, can you, hughes?

Inspection is necessary, to get the best deal possible for kids, but teaching is an amazingly complex and difficult job; as I said, far beyond most in the MetO. However, the pay may be comparable to teachers, after 10 years in the job, so why don't the MetO strikers who've decided decided their lot is not good enough, leave and re-train as maths and science teachers? If they are good enough, the teaching profession would love to have them........but they would have to be good enough. Pay teachers more; they do an incredible job, as do junior doctors in the NHS.

My daughter now teaches history at secondary level and after the Christmas break she wasn't looking forward to going back.


Years ago teachers just taught and there were good inspirational teachers, mediocre teachers and just plain nasty bits of work, but overall we went to school to be taught and therefore behaved ourselves and teacher never has a target on their back where all the ills and indiscipline of modern society were are laid squarely on their backs , as if they are to blame.

dawlish Wrote in message:
On Saturday, January 23, 2016 at 11:27:58 AM UTC, Col wrote:
On 23/01/2016 08:57, dawlish wrote:
On Friday, January 22, 2016 at 10:13:17 PM UTC, Tudor Hughes wrote:
On Friday, 22 January 2016 20:35:20 UTC, dawlish wrote:

You missed my irony, Scott. Teaching is an incredibly difficult job, beyond most in the MetO.

Especially with some ******* from OFSTED watching your every move.

Tudor Hughes.

You can never control your mouth, can you, hughes?

Inspection is necessary, to get the best deal possible for kids, but teaching is an amazingly complex and difficult job; as I said, far beyond most in the MetO. However, the pay may be comparable to teachers, after 10 years in the job, so why don't the MetO strikers who've decided decided their lot is not good enough, leave and re-train as maths and science teachers? If they are good enough, the teaching profession would love to have them.......but they would have to be good enough. Pay teachers more; they do an incredible job, as do junior doctors in the NHS.

How patronising!
Isn't meteorology 'an amazingly complex and difficult job'?
This is bourne out by how few times you dare to forecast at 10 days.

--
Col

Bolton, Lancashire
160m asl
Snow videos:
http://www.youtube.com/channel/UC3QvmL4UWBmHFMKWiwYm_gg

Meteorology, is in no way as difficult as teaching, I can assure you!
Having done both, I disagree.

--
Freddie
Pontesbury
Shropshire
102m AMSL
http://www.hosiene.co.uk/weather/
http://twitter.com/PontesburyWx for hourly reports


----Android NewsGroup Reader----
http://usenet.sinaapp.com/

On Saturday, 23 January 2016 13:01:45 UTC, dawlish wrote:

The MetO do not issue a forecast at 10 days for the general public

Are you trying to compare yourself to the Met Office?

On Saturday, 23 January 2016 20:42:50 UTC, Lawrence Jenkins wrote:
On Saturday, 23 January 2016 20:29:54 UTC, Tudor Hughes wrote:
On Saturday, 23 January 2016 13:01:45 UTC, dawlish wrote:
On Saturday, January 23, 2016 at 11:27:58 AM UTC, Col wrote:
On 23/01/2016 08:57, dawlish wrote:
On Friday, January 22, 2016 at 10:13:17 PM UTC, Tudor Hughes wrote:
On Friday, 22 January 2016 20:35:20 UTC, dawlish wrote:

You missed my irony, Scott. Teaching is an incredibly difficult job, beyond most in the MetO.

Especially with some ******* from OFSTED watching your every move.

Tudor Hughes.

You can never control your mouth, can you, hughes?

Inspection is necessary, to get the best deal possible for kids, but teaching is an amazingly complex and difficult job; as I said, far beyond most in the MetO. However, the pay may be comparable to teachers, after 10 years in the job, so why don't the MetO strikers who've decided decided their lot is not good enough, leave and re-train as maths and science teachers? If they are good enough, the teaching profession would love to have them.......but they would have to be good enough. Pay teachers more; they do an incredible job, as do junior doctors in the NHS.

How patronising!
Isn't meteorology 'an amazingly complex and difficult job'?
This is bourne out by how few times you dare to forecast at 10 days..

--
Col

Bolton, Lancashire
160m asl
Snow videos:
http://www.youtube.com/channel/UC3QvmL4UWBmHFMKWiwYm_gg

Patronising, but absolutely spot on. The MetO do not issue a forecast at 10 days for the general public, apart from a 6-15 day forecast, which is bland and general. Neither do they analyse any of their 6-15 day forecasts, so we have no idea of their accuracy. I think that actually puts me ahead in that one respect, don't you?

Meteorology, is in no way as difficult as teaching, I can assure you! Again, you are conflating two completely different things. Twice in a day.

You are upset. Calm down and think before you post, Col. 🤔🤔 I'm sure mitchell will step in here and criticise your spelling......

No, hughes is going to step in and call you a pompous patronising arrogant ****er. Paul ****ing Garvey, **** of the decade, destroyer of forums, at least those unable to sluice him out. Meteorological dilettante out of his depth. Friendless phony. Bull****ter of the first order. You're in the right job, aren't you, ****-face? I've never seen such an avalanche of waffle.
I've got other places to go but you haven't, have you, you ill-mannered ****? Ever thought why, thunder****? (I am indebted to a USW member for this splendid epithet, le mot juste).
If these discussions took place in real life you'd tone it down quite a lot, I reckon, or you'd be in A&E in no time, you ****ty little coward. But no big fist is going to come shooting out of a screen, is it, worm?
People often ask "what's the matter with him". Nothing wrong with him, he's just a complete ****.

Tudor Hughes.



Bloody hell Tudor, steady on with the "worm " stuff, tad strong that.

Yeah, I'd run out of rude words as you do with people like Dawlish. What about reptile? Skunk? Bacterium? Or simply monster.

Tudor Hughes.

On 23/01/2016 13:01, dawlish wrote:
On Saturday, January 23, 2016 at 11:27:58 AM UTC, Col wrote:
On 23/01/2016 08:57, dawlish wrote:
On Friday, January 22, 2016 at 10:13:17 PM UTC, Tudor Hughes wrote:
On Friday, 22 January 2016 20:35:20 UTC, dawlish wrote:

You missed my irony, Scott. Teaching is an incredibly difficult job, beyond most in the MetO.

Especially with some ******* from OFSTED watching your every move.

Tudor Hughes.

You can never control your mouth, can you, hughes?

Inspection is necessary, to get the best deal possible for kids, but teaching is an amazingly complex and difficult job; as I said, far beyond most in the MetO. However, the pay may be comparable to teachers, after 10 years in the job, so why don't the MetO strikers who've decided decided their lot is not good enough, leave and re-train as maths and science teachers? If they are good enough, the teaching profession would love to have them.......but they would have to be good enough. Pay teachers more; they do an incredible job, as do junior doctors in the NHS.

How patronising!
Isn't meteorology 'an amazingly complex and difficult job'?
This is bourne out by how few times you dare to forecast at 10 days.

--
Col

Bolton, Lancashire
160m asl
Snow videos:
http://www.youtube.com/channel/UC3QvmL4UWBmHFMKWiwYm_gg

Patronising, but absolutely spot on. The MetO do not issue a forecast at 10 days for the general public, apart from a 6-15 day forecast, which is bland and general. Neither do they analyse any of their 6-15 day forecasts, so we have no idea of their accuracy. I think that actually puts me ahead in that one respect, don't you?

I am sure they do analyse them, just don't makethe results freely available.

Meteorology, is in no way as difficult as teaching, I can assure you! Again, you are conflating two completely different things. Twice in a day.

Twice in a day, eh?
Naughty Col!

You are upset. Calm down and think before you post, Col. 🤔🤔 I'm sure mitchell will step in here and criticise your spelling......

I disagree with you and that makes me upset?
What astrange thing to say.

--
Col

Bolton, Lancashire
160m asl
Snow videos:
http://www.youtube.com/channel/UC3QvmL4UWBmHFMKWiwYm_gg

On 23/01/2016 20:29, Tudor Hughes wrote:


Patronising, but absolutely spot on. The MetO do not issue a forecast at 10 days for the general public, apart from a 6-15 day forecast, which is bland and general. Neither do they analyse any of their 6-15 day forecasts, so we have no idea of their accuracy. I think that actually puts me ahead in that one respect, don't you?

Meteorology, is in no way as difficult as teaching, I can assure you! Again, you are conflating two completely different things. Twice in a day.

You are upset. Calm down and think before you post, Col. 🤔🤔 I'm sure mitchell will step in here and criticise your spelling......

No, hughes is going to step in and call you a pompous patronising arrogant ****er. Paul ****ing Garvey, **** of the decade, destroyer of forums, at least those unable to sluice him out. Meteorological dilettante out of his depth. Friendless phony. Bull****ter of the first order. You're in the right job, aren't you, ****-face? I've never seen such an avalanche of waffle.
I've got other places to go but you haven't, have you, you ill-mannered ****? Ever thought why, thunder****? (I am indebted to a USW member for this splendid epithet, le mot juste).
If these discussions took place in real life you'd tone it down quite a lot, I reckon, or you'd be in A&E in no time, you ****ty little coward. But no big fist is going to come shooting out of a screen, is it, worm?
People often ask "what's the matter with him". Nothing wrong with him, he's just a complete ****.

'Thunder****'.
Now that did make me laugh.

You do realise that this post is going into his file entitled 'all the
horrible things people have called me', don't you?

It's quite a big file, apparently.....


--
Col

Bolton, Lancashire
160m asl
Snow videos:
http://www.youtube.com/channel/UC3QvmL4UWBmHFMKWiwYm_gg

On Sat, 23 Jan 2016 12:29:53 -0800 (PST), Tudor Hughes wrote:

a particularly stupid rant full of childish swearing and name calling, which adds nothing
to the debate but says a lot about "hughes" himself.