On Saturday, 23 January 2016 20:29:54 UTC, Tudor Hughes wrote:
On Saturday, 23 January 2016 13:01:45 UTC, dawlish wrote:
On Saturday, January 23, 2016 at 11:27:58 AM UTC, Col wrote:
On 23/01/2016 08:57, dawlish wrote:
On Friday, January 22, 2016 at 10:13:17 PM UTC, Tudor Hughes wrote:
On Friday, 22 January 2016 20:35:20 UTC, dawlish wrote:

You missed my irony, Scott. Teaching is an incredibly difficult job, beyond most in the MetO.

Especially with some ******* from OFSTED watching your every move.

Tudor Hughes.

You can never control your mouth, can you, hughes?

Inspection is necessary, to get the best deal possible for kids, but teaching is an amazingly complex and difficult job; as I said, far beyond most in the MetO. However, the pay may be comparable to teachers, after 10 years in the job, so why don't the MetO strikers who've decided decided their lot is not good enough, leave and re-train as maths and science teachers? If they are good enough, the teaching profession would love to have them........but they would have to be good enough. Pay teachers more; they do an incredible job, as do junior doctors in the NHS.

How patronising!
Isn't meteorology 'an amazingly complex and difficult job'?
This is bourne out by how few times you dare to forecast at 10 days.

--
Col

Bolton, Lancashire
160m asl
Snow videos:
http://www.youtube.com/channel/UC3QvmL4UWBmHFMKWiwYm_gg

Patronising, but absolutely spot on. The MetO do not issue a forecast at 10 days for the general public, apart from a 6-15 day forecast, which is bland and general. Neither do they analyse any of their 6-15 day forecasts, so we have no idea of their accuracy. I think that actually puts me ahead in that one respect, don't you?

Meteorology, is in no way as difficult as teaching, I can assure you! Again, you are conflating two completely different things. Twice in a day.

You are upset. Calm down and think before you post, Col. 🤔🤔 I'm sure mitchell will step in here and criticise your spelling......

No, hughes is going to step in and call you a pompous patronising arrogant ****er. Paul ****ing Garvey, **** of the decade, destroyer of forums, at least those unable to sluice him out. Meteorological dilettante out of his depth. Friendless phony. Bull****ter of the first order. You're in the right job, aren't you, ****-face? I've never seen such an avalanche of waffle.
I've got other places to go but you haven't, have you, you ill-mannered ****? Ever thought why, thunder****? (I am indebted to a USW member for this splendid epithet, le mot juste).
If these discussions took place in real life you'd tone it down quite a lot, I reckon, or you'd be in A&E in no time, you ****ty little coward. But no big fist is going to come shooting out of a screen, is it, worm?
People often ask "what's the matter with him". Nothing wrong with him, he's just a complete ****.

Tudor Hughes.



Bloody hell Tudor, steady on with the "worm " stuff, tad strong that.