On Monday, 12 May 2014 20:05:50 UTC+1, Dawlish wrote:
On Saturday, May 10, 2014 12:28:49 PM UTC+1, Lawrence Jenkins wrote:

On Saturday, 10 May 2014 02:30:00 UTC+1, Alan LeHun wrote:



In article ,



says...







You can't trust BOM. They lie about Australia past climate , lei about AGW and their computer model is ****e.















You are not sane, are you? The Aussie BOM are internationally respected and their info about ENSO is second to none. As they agree with NOAA, I suppose NOAA are liars who can't be trusted, who deal in ****s computer models too.



Where do you get your beliefs from?



It's not so much that he has his head buried in the sand, more that he



only has one foot left sticking out of it.



Alan LeHun







Reply-to is valid. Add "BPSF" to subject: to bypass spam filters.







Well whilst you're on 'foot in mouth' read this



http://jennifermarohasy.com/page/2/



and then recall some of the outrageous winter charts the BOM model through out several years ago.



I have to say the warmists are busting a gut on this El Nino forecast. What makes me laugh though, is if they feel the world is so imperilled by global warming, then you'd think the opposite; that they would be dreading as opposed to almost 'cheering El Nino' on.



Funny old world when you are an ideologue.



You are certainly not sane. Neither can you spell. Bet you can't link to any of those "charts" that the "BOM model" *threw* out several years ago. laughing



Do your wurst Conchita, but unfortunately the model runs are not archived as you well know but I clearly remember on TWO and Net weather the BOM becoming the favourite model as it produced what people wanted to see. Some may have been saved by someone . However my little minx its good to see you conceded to my other points

On Thursday, 8 May 2014 23:32:01 UTC-7, Dawlish wrote:
The Aussie BOM are internationally respected


Is one guy in England enough though?

On Tuesday, May 13, 2014 9:00:59 PM UTC+1, Lawrence Jenkins wrote:
On Monday, 12 May 2014 20:05:50 UTC+1, Dawlish wrote:

You are certainly not sane. Neither can you spell. Bet you can't link to any of those "charts" that the "BOM model" *threw* out several years ago. laughing

Do your wurst Conchita, but unfortunately the model runs are not archived as you well know but I clearly remember on TWO and Net weather the BOM becoming the favourite model as it produced what people wanted to see. Some may have been saved by someone . However my little minx its good to see you conceded to my other points

Didn't think you could link to it. What exactly *is* the BOM model larry? laughing?

On Tuesday, 13 May 2014 22:10:00 UTC+1, Dawlish wrote:
On Tuesday, May 13, 2014 9:00:59 PM UTC+1, Lawrence Jenkins wrote:

On Monday, 12 May 2014 20:05:50 UTC+1, Dawlish wrote:



You are certainly not sane. Neither can you spell. Bet you can't link to any of those "charts" that the "BOM model" *threw* out several years ago. laughing



Do your wurst Conchita, but unfortunately the model runs are not archived as you well know but I clearly remember on TWO and Net weather the BOM becoming the favourite model as it produced what people wanted to see. Some may have been saved by someone . However my little minx its good to see you conceded to my other points



Didn't think you could link to it. What exactly *is* the BOM model larry? laughing?

Are you really laughing paul ?

On Tuesday, May 13, 2014 11:17:41 PM UTC+1, Lawrence Jenkins wrote:
On Tuesday, 13 May 2014 22:10:00 UTC+1, Dawlish wrote:

On Tuesday, May 13, 2014 9:00:59 PM UTC+1, Lawrence Jenkins wrote:



On Monday, 12 May 2014 20:05:50 UTC+1, Dawlish wrote:







You are certainly not sane. Neither can you spell. Bet you can't link to any of those "charts" that the "BOM model" *threw* out several years ago. laughing







Do your wurst Conchita, but unfortunately the model runs are not archived as you well know but I clearly remember on TWO and Net weather the BOM becoming the favourite model as it produced what people wanted to see. Some may have been saved by someone . However my little minx its good to see you conceded to my other points

Didn't think you could link to it. What exactly *is* the BOM model larry? laughing?

Are you really laughing paul ?

At you? Oh yes. Because you are struggling. What exactly is the "BOM model".. Don't start squirming; just explain.