Hold on that's not in the bloody script!! Who wrote this play anyway.

A blog by any other name. Oh 'eck I feel a Shakespeare moment coming on.

Okay Garvey 'Torbay Or Not Torbay' that is the question.

Alas Poor Dawlish I knew him Well.


http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/06/2...0%a6%e2%80%9d/

On Thu, 25 Jun 2009 17:54:03 +0100, Lawrence Jenkins wrote in


Hold on that's not in the bloody script!! Who wrote this play anyway.

A blog by any other name. Oh 'eck I feel a Shakespeare moment coming on.

Okay Garvey 'Torbay Or Not Torbay' that is the question.

Alas Poor Dawlish I knew him Well.

http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/06/2...0%a6%e2%80%9d/

LOL you are a real tryer, Lawrence. Keep 'em coming:-)

--
Mike Tullett - Coleraine 55.13°N 6.69°W posted 25/06/2009 17:11:24 GMT

On Jun 25, 5:54*pm, "Lawrence Jenkins" wrote:
Hold on that's not in the bloody script!! Who wrote this play anyway.

A blog by any other name. *Oh 'eck I feel a Shakespeare moment coming on.

Lawrence Jenkins wrote:

Hold on that's not in the bloody script!! Who wrote this play anyway.

A blog by any other name. Oh 'eck I feel a Shakespeare moment coming on.

Okay Garvey 'Torbay Or Not Torbay' that is the question.

Alas Poor Dawlish I knew him Well.


http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/06/2...-is-still-not-
above-0%c2%b0c-the-latest-date-in-fifty-years-of-record-
keeping%e2%80%a6%e2%80%9d/

The Arctic usually only rises to around 0C during midsummer (July) so the
temperature record in June from one drifting ice-floe in the vast Arctic
Ocean is hardly anything for anyone to get excited about.

There is still less ice in the Arctic than normal - close to last year's
amount.


--
Graham P Davis, Bracknell, Berks., UK. E-mail: newsman not newsboy
"I wear the cheese. It does not wear me."

On Jun 25, 7:06*pm, Dawlish wrote:
On Jun 25, 5:54*pm, "Lawrence Jenkins" wrote:

Hold on that's not in the bloody script!! Who wrote this play anyway.

A blog by any other name. *Oh 'eck I feel a Shakespeare moment coming on.

Okay Garvey 'Torbay Or Not Torbay' that is the question.

Alas Poor Dawlish I knew him Well.

http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/06/2...e-is-still-not...

Thank you Lawrence. What's it got to do with me? I don't even believe
wholeheartedly in AGW. 90%, remember.

You've linked to a blog - one of the 3 three things I said you would.
You've referred us to a minority opinion again. It's an opinion. It's
not science. Look at the measurements of global temp over the last 12
years, then ask him the question; "why have all the 10 warmest years
in the last 130 occurred since 1997". Then see if he still maintains
the world hasn't warmed.

You might want to ask yourself the same question......then you're
highly likely to ignore the obvious answer, as you always do. The
obvious answer does not fit what you want to happen.

I wonder which of the 3 things in my list you'll do next?

Just for reference. A couple of days ago, I said.

"The next for you will be:

1. Either a link to a newspaper report, or a blog, which sympathises
with
your tiny minority views and about which you write no comment or
explanation, but present as some kind of "evidence" that you are
right.

2. A polemic against the government/Met office/Police force/whoever
which castigates them for not believing what you do and thus clearly
demonstrates that there is GW conspiracy afoot.


3. Some abuse."

I numbered them for reference. This one was a "1".

"Dawlish" wrote in message
...
On Jun 25, 5:54 pm, "Lawrence Jenkins" wrote:
Hold on that's not in the bloody script!! Who wrote this play anyway.

A blog by any other name. Oh 'eck I feel a Shakespeare moment coming on.

Okay Garvey 'Torbay Or Not Torbay' that is the question.

Alas Poor Dawlish I knew him Well.

http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/06/2...e-is-still-not...

Thank you Lawrence. What's it got to do with me? I don't even believe
wholeheartedly in AGW. 90%, remember.

You've linked to a blog - one of the 3 three things I said you would.
You've referred us to a minority opinion again. It's an opinion. It's
not science. Look at the measurements of global temp over the last 12
years, then ask him the question; "why have all the 10 warmest years
in the last 130 occurred since 1997". Then see if he still maintains
the world hasn't warmed.

You might want to ask yourself the same question......then you're
highly likely to ignore the obvious answer, as you always do. The
obvious answer does not fit what you want to happen.

I wonder which of the 3 things in my list you'll do next?

I linked it to you Marcus simply because you chickened out of the bet I
generously offered you..

What is ze list?

I vill take yours name next, vot is it?


Don't tell him Dawlish.

On Jun 25, 9:06*pm, "Lawrence Jenkins" wrote:
"Dawlish" wrote in message

...
On Jun 25, 5:54 pm, "Lawrence Jenkins" wrote:

Hold on that's not in the bloody script!! Who wrote this play anyway.

A blog by any other name. Oh 'eck I feel a Shakespeare moment coming on..

Okay Garvey 'Torbay Or Not Torbay' that is the question.

Alas Poor Dawlish I knew him Well.

http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/06/2...e-is-still-not...

Thank you Lawrence. What's it got to do with me? I don't even believe
wholeheartedly in AGW. 90%, remember.

You've linked to a blog - one of the 3 three things I said you would.
You've referred us to a minority opinion again. It's an opinion. It's
not science. Look at the measurements of global temp over the last 12
years, then ask him the question; "why have all the 10 warmest years
in the last 130 occurred since 1997". Then see if he still maintains
the world hasn't warmed.

You might want to ask yourself the same question......then you're
highly likely to ignore the obvious answer, as you always do. The
obvious answer does not fit what you want to happen.

I wonder which of the 3 things in my list you'll do next?

I linked it to you Marcus simply because you chickened out of the bet I
generously offered you..

What is ze list?

I vill take yours name next, vot is it?

Don't tell him Dawlish.

I don't think you are capable of structured argument any more
Lawrence. I think you are so far out on a limb with this that you will
now link to anything that vaguely backs the conspiracist existence
that you inhabit. The vast majority of Arctic scientists believe that
Arctic Sea ice is in decline. This year's low is likely to be well
below the 30-year mean. Exactly where it will lie in that sequence of
lows we'll see in September. Surely you can't believe that a blog that
links to one cold temperature can mean anything when the trend shows
such a decline? It's like linking to a cold temperature in Chicago at
the start of June, or telling us that the removal of an air
conditioning unit from a local buiding, or highlighting the advance
of one glacier in Argentina, or what a Times hack says in an article.
In terms of GW it means nothing and the sum of all your links means
nothing. The only thing that matters and what we must go on is the
well established warmimg trend.

Surely, even you can see that? Will it be 1, 2, or 3 next?

"Dawlish" wrote in message
...
On Jun 25, 9:06 pm, "Lawrence Jenkins" wrote:
"Dawlish" wrote in message

...
On Jun 25, 5:54 pm, "Lawrence Jenkins" wrote:

Hold on that's not in the bloody script!! Who wrote this play anyway.

A blog by any other name. Oh 'eck I feel a Shakespeare moment coming on.

Okay Garvey 'Torbay Or Not Torbay' that is the question.

Alas Poor Dawlish I knew him Well.

http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/06/2...e-is-still-not...

Thank you Lawrence. What's it got to do with me? I don't even believe
wholeheartedly in AGW. 90%, remember.

You've linked to a blog - one of the 3 three things I said you would.
You've referred us to a minority opinion again. It's an opinion. It's
not science. Look at the measurements of global temp over the last 12
years, then ask him the question; "why have all the 10 warmest years
in the last 130 occurred since 1997". Then see if he still maintains
the world hasn't warmed.

You might want to ask yourself the same question......then you're
highly likely to ignore the obvious answer, as you always do. The
obvious answer does not fit what you want to happen.

I wonder which of the 3 things in my list you'll do next?

I linked it to you Marcus simply because you chickened out of the bet I
generously offered you..

What is ze list?

I vill take yours name next, vot is it?

Don't tell him Dawlish.

I don't think you are capable of structured argument any more
Lawrence. I think you are so far out on a limb with this that you will
now link to anything that vaguely backs the conspiracist existence
that you inhabit. The vast majority of Arctic scientists believe that
Arctic Sea ice is in decline. This year's low is likely to be well
below the 30-year mean. Exactly where it will lie in that sequence of
lows we'll see in September. Surely you can't believe that a blog that
links to one cold temperature can mean anything when the trend shows
such a decline? It's like linking to a cold temperature in Chicago at
the start of June, or telling us that the removal of an air
conditioning unit from a local buiding, or highlighting the advance
of one glacier in Argentina, or what a Times hack says in an article.
In terms of GW it means nothing and the sum of all your links means
nothing. The only thing that matters and what we must go on is the
well established warmimg trend.

Surely, even you can see that? Will it be 1, 2, or 3 next?

I think the opening of a NW passage will be a jolly godd thing, don't you?

On Jun 25, 9:43*pm, "Lawrence Jenkins" wrote:
"Dawlish" wrote in message

...
On Jun 25, 9:06 pm, "Lawrence Jenkins" wrote:





"Dawlish" wrote in message

...
On Jun 25, 5:54 pm, "Lawrence Jenkins" wrote:

Hold on that's not in the bloody script!! Who wrote this play anyway.

A blog by any other name. Oh 'eck I feel a Shakespeare moment coming on.

Okay Garvey 'Torbay Or Not Torbay' that is the question.

Alas Poor Dawlish I knew him Well.

http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/06/2...e-is-still-not....

Thank you Lawrence. What's it got to do with me? I don't even believe
wholeheartedly in AGW. 90%, remember.

You've linked to a blog - one of the 3 three things I said you would.
You've referred us to a minority opinion again. It's an opinion. It's
not science. Look at the measurements of global temp over the last 12
years, then ask him the question; "why have all the 10 warmest years
in the last 130 occurred since 1997". Then see if he still maintains
the world hasn't warmed.

You might want to ask yourself the same question......then you're
highly likely to ignore the obvious answer, as you always do. The
obvious answer does not fit what you want to happen.

I wonder which of the 3 things in my list you'll do next?

I linked it to you Marcus simply because you chickened out of the bet I
generously offered you..

What is ze list?

I vill take yours name next, vot is it?

Don't tell him Dawlish.

I don't think you are capable of structured argument any more
Lawrence. I think you are so far out on a limb with this that you will
now link to anything that vaguely backs the conspiracist existence
that you inhabit. The vast majority of Arctic scientists believe that
Arctic Sea ice is in decline. This year's low is likely to be well
below the 30-year mean. Exactly where it will lie in that sequence of
lows we'll see in September. Surely you can't believe that a blog that
links to one cold temperature can mean anything when the trend shows
such a decline? It's like linking to a cold temperature in Chicago at
the start of June, or telling us that the removal of an air
conditioning unit from a local buiding, or highlighting the *advance
of one glacier in Argentina, or what a Times hack says in an article.
In terms of GW it means nothing and the sum of all your links means
nothing. The only thing that matters and what we must go on is the
well established warmimg trend.

Surely, even you can see that? Will it be 1, 2, or 3 next?

I think the opening of a NW passage will be a jolly godd thing, don't you?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

QED?

In message , Lawrence
Jenkins writes

"Dawlish" wrote in message
...
On Jun 25, 5:54 pm, "Lawrence Jenkins" wrote:
Hold on that's not in the bloody script!! Who wrote this play anyway.

A blog by any other name. Oh 'eck I feel a Shakespeare moment coming on.

Okay Garvey 'Torbay Or Not Torbay' that is the question.

Alas Poor Dawlish I knew him Well.

http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/06/2...e-is-still-not...

Thank you Lawrence. What's it got to do with me? I don't even believe
wholeheartedly in AGW. 90%, remember.

You've linked to a blog - one of the 3 three things I said you would.
You've referred us to a minority opinion again. It's an opinion. It's
not science. Look at the measurements of global temp over the last 12
years, then ask him the question; "why have all the 10 warmest years
in the last 130 occurred since 1997". Then see if he still maintains
the world hasn't warmed.

You might want to ask yourself the same question......then you're
highly likely to ignore the obvious answer, as you always do. The
obvious answer does not fit what you want to happen.

I wonder which of the 3 things in my list you'll do next?

I linked it to you Marcus simply because you chickened out of the bet I
generously offered you..

The "generous" bet in which you assume that global warming is occurring
more rapidly than anyone else here thinks it is? (You were offering even
odds that 2009 would be the lowest or second lowest annual Arctic ice
minimum on record.)

What is ze list?

I vill take yours name next, vot is it?


Don't tell him Dawlish.



--
Stewart Robert Hinsley