On Jun 25, 7:06*pm, Dawlish wrote:
On Jun 25, 5:54*pm, "Lawrence Jenkins" wrote:

Hold on that's not in the bloody script!! Who wrote this play anyway.

A blog by any other name. *Oh 'eck I feel a Shakespeare moment coming on.

Okay Garvey 'Torbay Or Not Torbay' that is the question.

Alas Poor Dawlish I knew him Well.

http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/06/2...e-is-still-not...

Thank you Lawrence. What's it got to do with me? I don't even believe
wholeheartedly in AGW. 90%, remember.

You've linked to a blog - one of the 3 three things I said you would.
You've referred us to a minority opinion again. It's an opinion. It's
not science. Look at the measurements of global temp over the last 12
years, then ask him the question; "why have all the 10 warmest years
in the last 130 occurred since 1997". Then see if he still maintains
the world hasn't warmed.

You might want to ask yourself the same question......then you're
highly likely to ignore the obvious answer, as you always do. The
obvious answer does not fit what you want to happen.

I wonder which of the 3 things in my list you'll do next?

Just for reference. A couple of days ago, I said.

"The next for you will be:

1. Either a link to a newspaper report, or a blog, which sympathises
with
your tiny minority views and about which you write no comment or
explanation, but present as some kind of "evidence" that you are
right.

2. A polemic against the government/Met office/Police force/whoever
which castigates them for not believing what you do and thus clearly
demonstrates that there is GW conspiracy afoot.


3. Some abuse."

I numbered them for reference. This one was a "1".