On Jun 25, 9:06*pm, "Lawrence Jenkins" wrote:
"Dawlish" wrote in message

...
On Jun 25, 5:54 pm, "Lawrence Jenkins" wrote:

Hold on that's not in the bloody script!! Who wrote this play anyway.

A blog by any other name. Oh 'eck I feel a Shakespeare moment coming on..

Okay Garvey 'Torbay Or Not Torbay' that is the question.

Alas Poor Dawlish I knew him Well.

http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/06/2...e-is-still-not...

Thank you Lawrence. What's it got to do with me? I don't even believe
wholeheartedly in AGW. 90%, remember.

You've linked to a blog - one of the 3 three things I said you would.
You've referred us to a minority opinion again. It's an opinion. It's
not science. Look at the measurements of global temp over the last 12
years, then ask him the question; "why have all the 10 warmest years
in the last 130 occurred since 1997". Then see if he still maintains
the world hasn't warmed.

You might want to ask yourself the same question......then you're
highly likely to ignore the obvious answer, as you always do. The
obvious answer does not fit what you want to happen.

I wonder which of the 3 things in my list you'll do next?

I linked it to you Marcus simply because you chickened out of the bet I
generously offered you..

What is ze list?

I vill take yours name next, vot is it?

Don't tell him Dawlish.

I don't think you are capable of structured argument any more
Lawrence. I think you are so far out on a limb with this that you will
now link to anything that vaguely backs the conspiracist existence
that you inhabit. The vast majority of Arctic scientists believe that
Arctic Sea ice is in decline. This year's low is likely to be well
below the 30-year mean. Exactly where it will lie in that sequence of
lows we'll see in September. Surely you can't believe that a blog that
links to one cold temperature can mean anything when the trend shows
such a decline? It's like linking to a cold temperature in Chicago at
the start of June, or telling us that the removal of an air
conditioning unit from a local buiding, or highlighting the advance
of one glacier in Argentina, or what a Times hack says in an article.
In terms of GW it means nothing and the sum of all your links means
nothing. The only thing that matters and what we must go on is the
well established warmimg trend.

Surely, even you can see that? Will it be 1, 2, or 3 next?