Room 101 in a political system that wouldn't need such a room is the IPCC system of getting public opinion crowd-funded into the religous belief that there is only the one version of truth.
So how does the threat to the only man likely to have negative vibes about global warming fare in the recent court ruling that a few weeks is not long enough for new party members to get to know the ethics of the new challenger to labour leadership?

Or to put it another yet more delelict way:
How does the present party rulership know that the recent sign-up is going to vote for a certain party of the party?

Please don't bother answering as I only want to annoy the stalwarts here with the ability to think.