URL for Bruces's site
 

On Monday, 4 July 2016 15:16:49 UTC+1, JohnD wrote:
"Lawrence Jenkins" wrote in message
...

Talk about wanting yer cake and eat it.

I think it's called a free world.

True it is that but I would also categorise it as a tad hypocritical.

People voted for brexit so they can't decide to chop and change once the vote has taken place. He either came back to gloat or he wants my friendship.

URL for Bruces's site
 

"Lawrence Jenkins" wrote in message
...

I think it's called a free world.

True it is that but I would also categorise it as a tad hypocritical.

Absolute nonsense. Many people here monitor and contribute to multiple
weather groups/forums. What's wrong with that? Doesn't bother me, nor most
here I suspect, in the slightest.

People voted for brexit so they can't decide to chop and change once the
vote has taken place. He either came back to gloat or he wants my
friendship.

That's got to win some sort of prize for non-sequitur of the year. But since
you raise the Brexit point, and as an aside, there does indeed look like
being every possibility of 'chop and change'. A fraudulent Leave campaign, a
wafer-thing majority, many Leave voters confused about the reality of their
vote ('I didn't really mean it like that'!) and, in any event, it looks
possible that it may be illegal for the government to trigger Article 50
without the support of a Commons vote - High Court action pending,
potentially.

URL for Bruces's site
 

On Monday, 4 July 2016 15:55:54 UTC+1, Lawrence Jenkins wrote:
On Monday, 4 July 2016 15:16:49 UTC+1, JohnD wrote:
"Lawrence Jenkins" wrote in message
...

Talk about wanting yer cake and eat it.

I think it's called a free world.

True it is that but I would also categorise it as a tad hypocritical.

People voted for brexit so they can't decide to chop and change once the vote has taken place. He either came back to gloat or he wants my friendship.

I came back to see if I could persuade anyone else who was swithering about making a change or even cross posting to see if they liked a forum rather than a newsgroup.

I've been reading and posting to this blog for the last 20 years and I don't need your permission to post to it.

I am not gloating in the slightest, this newsgroup has gone to the dogs over the last 10 years hijacked by a small group of people, and I am sad to see its demise, like so many other subscribers to it are either past or present.

URL for Bruces's site
 

Bruce said you couldn't link directly, well here it is
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!fo...therandclimate

I will look at it from time to time, but I don't think I'll be
contributing. Not that I ever did, much, really, so you aren't
going to miss me.

Anne

URL for Bruces's site
 

On Monday, 4 July 2016 16:56:35 UTC+1, xmetman wrote:
On Monday, 4 July 2016 15:55:54 UTC+1, Lawrence Jenkins wrote:
On Monday, 4 July 2016 15:16:49 UTC+1, JohnD wrote:
"Lawrence Jenkins" wrote in message
...

Talk about wanting yer cake and eat it.

I think it's called a free world.

True it is that but I would also categorise it as a tad hypocritical.

People voted for brexit so they can't decide to chop and change once the vote has taken place. He either came back to gloat or he wants my friendship.

I came back to see if I could persuade anyone else who was swithering about making a change or even cross posting to see if they liked a forum rather than a newsgroup.

I've been reading and posting to this blog for the last 20 years and I don't need your permission to post to it.

I am not gloating in the slightest, this newsgroup has gone to the dogs over the last 10 years hijacked by a small group of people, and I am sad to see its demise, like so many other subscribers to it are either past or present.

No one said you needed permission did they. I see you're back again though.

URL for Bruces's site
 

On Monday, 4 July 2016 16:31:11 UTC+1, JohnD wrote:
"Lawrence Jenkins" wrote in message
...

I think it's called a free world.

True it is that but I would also categorise it as a tad hypocritical.

Absolute nonsense. Many people here monitor and contribute to multiple
weather groups/forums. What's wrong with that? Doesn't bother me, nor most
here I suspect, in the slightest.

People voted for brexit so they can't decide to chop and change once the
vote has taken place. He either came back to gloat or he wants my
friendship.

That's got to win some sort of prize for non-sequitur of the year. But since
you raise the Brexit point, and as an aside, there does indeed look like
being every possibility of 'chop and change'. A fraudulent Leave campaign, a
wafer-thing majority, many Leave voters confused about the reality of their
vote ('I didn't really mean it like that'!) and, in any event, it looks
possible that it may be illegal for the government to trigger Article 50
without the support of a Commons vote - High Court action pending,
potentially.

Majority vote by the people and it would have been even stronger for if it hadn't been for the SNP. However there were plenty of rational Scots who voted against independence and plenty on voted to leave. I had to laugh at the hypocritical carping of the SNP who get to vote in parliament and Hollywood or is it Holyrood-who anyway, cares just a load of fictitious 'Brave Hearts' the lot of them. Anyhow as they get to vote in their own parliament and then in ours even though we don't vote in theirs, the William Wallace's were still moaning and crying they were now out of Europe against their will. It however shows the sheer hypocrisy of todays politicians especially the SNP because as Cameron pointed out to them that if they had have won their independence vote they would have been out of Europe anyway. These people are despicable.

URL for Bruces's site
 

On Monday, July 4, 2016 at 2:20:58 PM UTC+1, xmetman wrote:
On Monday, 4 July 2016 12:40:00 UTC+1, Lawrence Jenkins wrote:
On Monday, 4 July 2016 09:56:15 UTC+1, wrote:
Bruce said you couldn't link directly, well here it is
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!fo...therandclimate

https://groups.google.com/forum/#!fo...therandclimate

Will
--
" Some sects believe that the world was created 5000 years ago. Another sect
believes that it was created in 1910 "
http://www.lyneside.demon.co.uk/Hayt...antage_Pro.htm
Will Hand (Haytor, Devon, 1017 feet asl)
---------------------------------------------

I linked it in my Google groups yesterday. Don't worry I don't intend to join , you lot need a break from the likes of me.

Lawrence

Thanks for the reassurance.

I imagine that you are now doomed to remain here, locked in a titanic struggle of good over evil, in a battle with the dark forces with the likes of Dawlish and Weatherlawyer for the rest of eternity.

Bruce.

URL for Bruces's site
 

"Anne B" wrote in message
...
Bruce said you couldn't link directly, well here it is
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!fo...therandclimate

I will look at it from time to time, but I don't think I'll be
contributing. Not that I ever did, much, really, so you aren't going to
miss me.


Well we will miss you Anne!
I cannot be involved either mainly coz I'm on the ukweatherworld severe
weather warnings team!
But good luck to Bruce.

Will
--
" Some sects believe that the world was created 5000 years ago. Another sect
believes that it was created in 1910 "
http://www.lyneside.demon.co.uk/Hayt...antage_Pro.htm
Will Hand (Haytor, Devon, 1017 feet asl)
---------------------------------------------

URL for Bruces's site
 

On Monday, 4 July 2016 17:19:37 UTC+1, Lawrence Jenkins wrote:
On Monday, 4 July 2016 16:31:11 UTC+1, JohnD wrote:
"Lawrence Jenkins" wrote in message

I think it's called a free world.

True it is that but I would also categorise it as a tad hypocritical.

Absolute nonsense. Many people here monitor and contribute to multiple
weather groups/forums. What's wrong with that? Doesn't bother me, nor most
here I suspect, in the slightest.

People voted for brexit so they can't decide to chop and change once the
vote has taken place. He either came back to gloat or he wants my
friendship.

That's got to win some sort of prize for non-sequitur of the year. But since
you raise the Brexit point, and as an aside, there does indeed look like
being every possibility of 'chop and change'. A fraudulent Leave campaign, a
wafer-thing majority, many Leave voters confused about the reality of their
vote ('I didn't really mean it like that'!) and, in any event, it looks
possible that it may be illegal for the government to trigger Article 50
without the support of a Commons vote - High Court action pending,
potentially.

Majority vote by the people and it would have been even stronger for if it hadn't been for the SNP. However there were plenty of rational Scots who voted against independence and plenty on voted to leave. I had to laugh at the hypocritical carping of the SNP who get to vote in parliament and Hollywood or is it Holyrood-who anyway, cares just a load of fictitious 'Brave Hearts' the lot of them. Anyhow as they get to vote in their own parliament and then in ours even though we don't vote in theirs, the William Wallace's were still moaning and crying they were now out of Europe against their will. It however shows the sheer hypocrisy of todays politicians especially the SNP because as Cameron pointed out to them that if they had have won their independence vote they would have been out of Europe anyway. These people are despicable.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
What you talking about?
It's the SNP that got Cameron in by destroying the Labour party in Scotland..
Cameron only had his bit of glory because of the Lib Dems first time round, and the SNP second time round. We have a stupid electoral system.
O and by the way, to keep on topic, now we are going to leave EU, we have £650 million per week (according to the Leave brigade), some of which will be handy to give to UKMO to improve their forecasts.

The charlatans that led the Leave brigade and hoodwinked Jo Public are now nowhere to be seen to lead the country out of the mess. I wonder why?

Len
Wembury
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

URL for Bruces's site
 

On Monday, 4 July 2016 15:16:49 UTC+1, JohnD wrote:
"Lawrence Jenkins" wrote in message
...

Talk about wanting yer cake and eat it.

I think it's called a free world.

And America has honest elections just like they do in Asia.
And Tony Blair is going to face a possible prison sentence due to the finding of the Chilcot enquiry.

And all the lads who were killed in Iraq and Afghanistan will live happily ever after, in heaven so everyone is much better off all round.