Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) (uk.sci.weather) For the discussion of daily weather events, chiefly affecting the UK and adjacent parts of Europe, both past and predicted. The discussion is open to all, but contributions on a practical scientific level are encouraged. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thursday, 19 September 2013 17:36:32 UTC+1, Dawlish wrote:
An interesting paper: http://phys.org/news/2013-04-contend...a-ice-due.html Straws, desperation, idiocy, bandwagons, religion, vanity and wannabe intellectual comes to mind. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Saturday, September 21, 2013 12:12:52 PM UTC+1, Lawrence13 wrote:
On Thursday, 19 September 2013 17:36:32 UTC+1, Dawlish wrote: An interesting paper: http://phys.org/news/2013-04-contend...a-ice-due.html Straws, desperation, idiocy, bandwagons, religion, vanity and wannabe intellectual comes to mind. Yes larry; we know that's what you always do and we know you are projecting. However this is science. No wonder you didn't understand a word and need to simply deny it, as you don't like what it says. It doesn't fit with what you want to believe. Fortunately, no-one with a scrap of influence cares what far right-wing climate deniers with ingrained agendas, like you, think and they listen to scientists like the Dutch ones who produced this research, instead. *)) |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thursday, 19 September 2013 17:36:32 UTC+1, Dawlish wrote:
An interesting paper: http://phys.org/news/2013-04-contend...a-ice-due.html From Wiki Antarctica at its warmest January along the coast and averages slightly below freezing. What melting. Are these people nuts!!!! There is hardly any to no melting, so how does that account for this http://nsidc.org/data/seaice_index/i...timeseries.png |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Saturday, 21 September 2013 12:31:48 UTC+1, Dawlish wrote:
On Saturday, September 21, 2013 12:12:52 PM UTC+1, Lawrence13 wrote: On Thursday, 19 September 2013 17:36:32 UTC+1, Dawlish wrote: An interesting paper: http://phys.org/news/2013-04-contend...a-ice-due.html Straws, desperation, idiocy, bandwagons, religion, vanity and wannabe intellectual comes to mind. Yes larry; we know that's what you always do and we know you are projecting. However this is science. No wonder you didn't understand a word and need to simply deny it, as you don't like what it says. It doesn't fit with what you want to believe. Fortunately, no-one with a scrap of influence cares what far right-wing climate deniers with ingrained agendas, like you, think and they listen to scientists like the Dutch ones who produced this research, instead. *)) Yes I did explain its scientific value in the post I sent just as you posted this........zero. |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Saturday, September 21, 2013 12:37:26 PM UTC+1, Lawrence13 wrote:
On Saturday, 21 September 2013 12:31:48 UTC+1, Dawlish wrote: On Saturday, September 21, 2013 12:12:52 PM UTC+1, Lawrence13 wrote: On Thursday, 19 September 2013 17:36:32 UTC+1, Dawlish wrote: An interesting paper: http://phys.org/news/2013-04-contend...a-ice-due.html Straws, desperation, idiocy, bandwagons, religion, vanity and wannabe intellectual comes to mind. Yes larry; we know that's what you always do and we know you are projecting. However this is science. No wonder you didn't understand a word and need to simply deny it, as you don't like what it says. It doesn't fit with what you want to believe. Fortunately, no-one with a scrap of influence cares what far right-wing climate deniers with ingrained agendas, like you, think and they listen to scientists like the Dutch ones who produced this research, instead. *)) Yes I did explain its scientific value in the post I sent just as you posted this........zero. I'm afraid you turned on rant mode and said something stupid. Explain? Nah, not you. A denier can't "explain". He can only deny. |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Saturday, 21 September 2013 12:46:01 UTC+1, Dawlish wrote:
On Saturday, September 21, 2013 12:37:26 PM UTC+1, Lawrence13 wrote: On Saturday, 21 September 2013 12:31:48 UTC+1, Dawlish wrote: On Saturday, September 21, 2013 12:12:52 PM UTC+1, Lawrence13 wrote: On Thursday, 19 September 2013 17:36:32 UTC+1, Dawlish wrote: An interesting paper: http://phys.org/news/2013-04-contend...a-ice-due.html Straws, desperation, idiocy, bandwagons, religion, vanity and wannabe intellectual comes to mind. Yes larry; we know that's what you always do and we know you are projecting. However this is science. No wonder you didn't understand a word and need to simply deny it, as you don't like what it says. It doesn't fit with what you want to believe. Fortunately, no-one with a scrap of influence cares what far right-wing climate deniers with ingrained agendas, like you, think and they listen to scientists like the Dutch ones who produced this research, instead. *)) Yes I did explain its scientific value in the post I sent just as you posted this........zero. I'm afraid you turned on rant mode and said something stupid. Explain? Nah, not you. A denier can't "explain". He can only deny. Now listen here Hilarious Garvey: You call me denier. What am I denying?. Please explain. |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Saturday, 21 September 2013 12:46:01 UTC+1, Dawlish wrote:
On Saturday, September 21, 2013 12:37:26 PM UTC+1, Lawrence13 wrote: On Saturday, 21 September 2013 12:31:48 UTC+1, Dawlish wrote: On Saturday, September 21, 2013 12:12:52 PM UTC+1, Lawrence13 wrote: On Thursday, 19 September 2013 17:36:32 UTC+1, Dawlish wrote: An interesting paper: http://phys.org/news/2013-04-contend...a-ice-due.html Straws, desperation, idiocy, bandwagons, religion, vanity and wannabe intellectual comes to mind. Yes larry; we know that's what you always do and we know you are projecting. However this is science. No wonder you didn't understand a word and need to simply deny it, as you don't like what it says. It doesn't fit with what you want to believe. Fortunately, no-one with a scrap of influence cares what far right-wing climate deniers with ingrained agendas, like you, think and they listen to scientists like the Dutch ones who produced this research, instead. *)) Yes I did explain its scientific value in the post I sent just as you posted this........zero. I'm afraid you turned on rant mode and said something stupid. Explain? Nah, not you. A denier can't "explain". He can only deny. If you mean by 'rant' laying out the facts , then yes I ranted and on that basis you won't be able to reciprocate in rant. |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Pay im no attention Lawrence. Like all the other brainwashed lot he cant see reason. 97% of computer climate models have overestimated warming due to CO2, etc.
How come we dont see the media publicising that 97% consensus? Chin up lad. Big Jim |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Saturday, September 21, 2013 5:26:32 PM UTC+1, Jim Cannon wrote:
Pay im no attention Lawrence. Like all the other brainwashed lot he cant see reason. 97% of computer climate models have overestimated warming due to CO2, etc. How come we dont see the media publicising that 97% consensus? Chin up lad. Big Jim Idiot. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Is this the real reason why the Arctic sea ice is in decline? | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
Massive Decline in Antarctic Sea Ice. Combined global Sea Ice hasDropped Significantly as Well. | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
Very big sea recently - Bigger to come? | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
July sea ice second lowest: oldest ice begins to melt | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
Satellites: Most Significant Antarctic Melt in Three Decades! | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) |