Hints, no more than that, but the gfs has thrown up something
different to anticyclonic dominance, at T+240, on the last 2 runs.

http://www.wetterzentrale.de/pics/Rtavn2401.png

Crap! I'm due to go camping from 28th till the 2nd May so hope its delayed
by a couple of days if it happens.

R

"Dawlish" wrote in message
...
Hints, no more than that, but the gfs has thrown up something
different to anticyclonic dominance, at T+240, on the last 2 runs.

http://www.wetterzentrale.de/pics/Rtavn2401.png

On Apr 21, 5:21*pm, Dawlish wrote:
Hints, no more than that, but the gfs has thrown up something
different to anticyclonic dominance, at T+240, on the last 2 runs.

http://www.wetterzentrale.de/pics/Rtavn2401.png

The operational runs were both cyclonic outliers. The majority of the
12Z ensembles show pressure building at T+240 after taking a bit of a
dip around 28th/29th April.

Dick Lovett

exactly, he dosent have the relative like Will to spot this.
and again, the subject line is ended with "?", which means no forecast
cop out crap as usual.

On 21/04/2011 6:30 PM, Dick wrote:
On Apr 21, 5:21 pm, wrote:
Hints, no more than that, but the gfs has thrown up something
different to anticyclonic dominance, at T+240, on the last 2 runs.

http://www.wetterzentrale.de/pics/Rtavn2401.png

The operational runs were both cyclonic outliers. The majority of the
12Z ensembles show pressure building at T+240 after taking a bit of a
dip around 28th/29th April.

Dick Lovett

thats relative skills

On 21/04/2011 7:12 PM, George Agdgdgwngo wrote:
exactly, he dosent have the relative like Will to spot this.
and again, the subject line is ended with "?", which means no forecast
cop out crap as usual.

On 21/04/2011 6:30 PM, Dick wrote:
On Apr 21, 5:21 pm, wrote:
Hints, no more than that, but the gfs has thrown up something
different to anticyclonic dominance, at T+240, on the last 2 runs.

http://www.wetterzentrale.de/pics/Rtavn2401.png

The operational runs were both cyclonic outliers. The majority of the
12Z ensembles show pressure building at T+240 after taking a bit of a
dip around 28th/29th April.

Dick Lovett

George Agdgdgwngo wrote:
thats relative skills

-----------------
If you're going to correct your own mistakes at least try and get them
right. i.e "that's relevant skills"

On Apr 21, 7:48*pm, Dave Cornwell wrote:
George Agdgdgwngo wrote:
thats relative skills

-----------------
If you're going to correct your own mistakes at least try and get them
right. i.e "that's relevant skills"



- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Not really backed by the 12z ECM, but that's not the charts that we've
seen recently. Still very blocked to the north however.

heres your response to that

?


ps ? = cop out, you cant touch or blame me




On 21/04/2011 7:48 PM, Dave Cornwell wrote:
George Agdgdgwngo wrote:
thats relative skills

-----------------
If you're going to correct your own mistakes at least try and get them
right. i.e "that's relevant skills"

On Apr 21, 5:21*pm, Dawlish wrote:
Hints, no more than that, but the gfs has thrown up something
different to anticyclonic dominance, at T+240, on the last 2 runs.

http://www.wetterzentrale.de/pics/Rtavn2401.png

They were no more than model hints and ended up as outliers which
didn't herald a change. Still very blocked at T240 on the 00z ECM and
the gfs this morning.