sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) (sci.geo.meteorology) For the discussion of meteorology and related topics.

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #1   Report Post  
Old December 10th 08, 11:04 PM posted to sci.geo.meteorology,alt.energy.renewable,alt.politics.bush,alt.conspiracy
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: May 2005
Posts: 1,360
Default at least TWO VERY LARGE MISTAKES, BONZO! WAS: Fudgin' Hansen"Adjusts" A Cooling Trend Into A Warming Trend !!!

Ahem, at least TWO VERY LARGE MISTAKES, BONZO.

1) The adjustments and corrections to raw
USHCN are not done by GISS or Hansen. The
NOAA does this work.

2) USHCN data covers the continental US,
which is less than 1 and a half percent
of global area. These data have a very
small effect on the global mean surface
temperature series.

 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Contrarian GW papers: Common mistakes. Dawlish uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) 10 September 2nd 15 03:48 PM
First published use of the word "thermodynamics" by James E. Hansen Leon sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) 2 March 4th 10 01:58 PM
A Cooling Trend Toward Global Warming Ms. 2[_21_] sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) 5 April 2nd 09 08:52 PM
TWO MAJOR MISTAKES HERE WAS: Arctic Sea Ice Area Now Near The EdgeOf Normal Standard Deviation Roger Coppock sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) 0 October 24th 08 02:47 AM
A Rational Critique Of Fudgin' Hansen Eeyore sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) 0 August 3rd 08 11:26 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:12 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 Weather Banter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Weather"

 

Copyright © 2017