sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) (sci.geo.meteorology) For the discussion of meteorology and related topics.

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #1   Report Post  
Old August 14th 03, 06:35 PM posted to sci.geo.meteorology
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Aug 2003
Posts: 5
Default I have a better explanation!

After thinking about it for a little while, I've come up with something
better. I wish I could draw a picture but I will try to explain. As the
shock wave from the bolt is first generated, each portion of the channel
produces an outward traveling wave at the same instant in time. But the
parts of the wave originating very close to the observer have a uniform
amplitude. This means that the wave initially travels perfectly
perpendicular to the bolt, expanding in a cylindrical fashion. As the shock
wave breaks up and decreases in amplitude this cylinder begins to break up
as different parts of the wave go out of faze with each other due to the
unevenness of the channel.

When you are standing very near the bolt, the shock wave will travel
perpendicularly to the bolt so that you only hear the closest part, while
the sound from higher up passes unheard over your head. This is the laud
snap. A split second later you will hear the more rumbly thunder
originating from higher up. This sound has already broken up and gone out
of phase, so portions of it can reach your location since it no longer
travels perpendicularly but now spreads in every direction.

I am pretty sure this is the answer to your question. However, I would
appreciate some feedback or corrections if someone knowledgeable stumbles
across this message.


 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
I have been missing my dose of wet sheep during all this politicalfarceholing. Can we now have some more comedy of errors ? Weatherlawyer uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) 4 June 29th 16 09:03 AM
We might not have 2ft of snow but we do have 14°C! dawlish uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) 9 January 24th 16 08:24 PM
We might not have 2ft of snow but we do have 14°C! Lawrence Jenkins uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) 0 January 24th 16 02:48 PM
Anti-Science Climate Change Deniers Have Lost - They Have Been Easily Reduced To A Handful Of Kooks, Stooges And Vile AntiCapitalists Michael Dobony sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) 0 October 22nd 09 04:32 PM
What ambulance chasing lawyer did Belfort hire to further harass one of their employees? Can anyone provide their name and information? This guy must not have any work, or be desperate for business! I bet he is telling Belfort that they have such [email protected] sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) 1 January 13th 06 07:35 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:35 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 Weather Banter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Weather"

 

Copyright © 2017