Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) (uk.sci.weather) For the discussion of daily weather events, chiefly affecting the UK and adjacent parts of Europe, both past and predicted. The discussion is open to all, but contributions on a practical scientific level are encouraged. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
From the 'Handbook of Meteorological Instruments': Psychrometers.
From Table II, let's assume that you are dealing with air temperatures in the range 10 to 25 degC, and a relative humidity 'around' 60 to 80%. From the table, for a 10% change in the psychrometer coefficient, for the envelope of values above, then we are looking at 'variations' in RH of 0.5 to 1.9%. The psychrometer coefficients (temperatures 0degC / as used in the UK Met Office) for 'natural' = 0.799 and 'forced' (or aspirated) = 0.666; this represents a difference of 0.133, or roughly 18% of the mean of these two values. Scaling up from the figures given for the 10% calculations (above) we have roughly a *maximum* "error" of around 3.5 % RH. I can't imagine, given the other variables in 'field-work' measurement of temps/wet-bulb, and the fact that cloud-bases are related to the nearest 100 ft, that this difference is going to make a h'apporth of difference. As noted elsewhere, the problem is usually lack of ventilation, not too much. As long as the bulb *remains* damp whilst reading the dry and 'wet' bulb, for your purposes, I can't see the problem. Martin. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Wet bulb measurements below 0C dry bulb temps | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
web bulb / dry bulb??? | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
wet bulb potential temperature. | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
New Wet Bulb Wicks | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
measuring wet bulb | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) |