"xmetman" wrote in message
...

Its not intentional I can assure you and might just be the defaults are you
when you create it. So you can't even read the posts as a non-member?

Looks like you've now fixed that particular issue. It can be seen publicly
(I think by anyone logged in with a Google account).

On 03/07/2016 11:00, JohnD wrote:
"xmetman" wrote in message
...

Its not intentional I can assure you and might just be the defaults
are you when you create it. So you can't even read the posts as a
non-member?

Looks like you've now fixed that particular issue. It can be seen
publicly (I think by anyone logged in with a Google account).

I got in OK this morning using my existing gmail email address. Haven't
woked out how to use html rather than text for my summaries. ?

--
Keith (Southend)
"Weather Home & Abroad"
http://www.southendweather.net
Twitter:@SS9Weatherman

On Sun, 3 Jul 2016 11:00:18 +0100, "JohnD"
wrote:

Looks like you've now fixed that particular issue. It can be seen publicly
(I think by anyone logged in with a Google account).

I can read it without a Google account.

--
Alan White
Mozilla Firefox and Forte Agent.
By Loch Long, twenty-eight miles NW of Glasgow, Scotland.
Webcam and weather:- http://windycroft.co.uk/weather

Alan

Thanks for that info.

I hadn't realised that the settings had only allowed members of the forum to view, which wouldn't have helped its reach or popularity very much!

Bruce.

On Sunday, 3 July 2016 09:45:10 UTC+1, xmetman wrote:
On Sunday, 3 July 2016 04:17:38 UTC+1, Weatherlawyer wrote:
On Thursday, 30 June 2016 11:51:56 UTC+1, xmetman wrote:

Dear All

Just to clarify something.

By all do you mean the people whose posts you have never seen or do you mean an elite that only thinks the way you do.
And is believing absolute nonsense a condition?

Bruce.

Just how many posts on here are you completely ignorant of?

Weatherlawyer

If you want to join thats fine, and as long as what you post is on topic (about the weather and climate) I'll let them through.

I know that you post frequently on this newsgroup, but personally I have never understood your methods or anything that you're trying to say and I think thats the view of most people.

If you don't mind me saying so, that can't possibly be true as they would have asked by now, unless of course they were too shy to admit that they couldn't do wha a wet sheep has no trouble with.

If you don't like the terms keep posting to UKSW.

Very kind of you but I am not interested in something set up for a bunch of lying crackpots. Sorry.
Don't get me wrong, I do hope you prosper but I can't see god blessing anything based on political lies.

On Sunday, 3 July 2016 11:44:41 UTC+1, Alan White wrote:
On Sun, 3 Jul 2016 11:00:18 +0100, "JohnD"
wrote:

Looks like you've now fixed that particular issue. It can be seen publicly
(I think by anyone logged in with a Google account).

I can read it without a Google account.

Because I can't monitor this group 24/7 and be around every minute of the day to moderate your posts, I have decided (arbitrarily because there is no committee just yet) to trust the majority of people that previously posted to UKSW. If you're not one of them, I apologise now. It's not any reflection on who you are, or necessarily what you've posted, it's because I don't know you, or perhaps that I do know you and I can't trust you to stay on topic. If you can't live with that, just content yourself with reading the posts, or if that's not to your liking then I suggest that you mosey on back to UKSW and take it out on them. Straying off topic and killfiles will hopefully be a thing of the past, this forum is for people only interested to read about things pertaining to weather, climate and meteorology. What this forum needs if it is to survive and thrive are your posts, so keep them coming!

He is hardly management material, no offence intended but most people just aren't. You can't hope to float any enterprise without knowing exactly what you are doing and trusting people much more than he shows. Basing a forum on people who just want other people killed is somewhat American, is it not?

If he had more sense he would have got a good forum package from Sourceforge or WordPress. And learned how to use it before sending it out to fend for itself. He is relying on Google (if he knows that much) because the bandwidth from them is plentiful. The problem there is that the facilities are cut to the bone -compare Blogger for example.

On 03/07/2016 13:17, Weatherlawyer wrote:
On Sunday, 3 July 2016 11:44:41 UTC+1, Alan White wrote:
On Sun, 3 Jul 2016 11:00:18 +0100, "JohnD"
wrote:

Looks like you've now fixed that particular issue. It can be seen publicly
(I think by anyone logged in with a Google account).

I can read it without a Google account.

Because I can't monitor this group 24/7 and be around every minute of the day to moderate your posts, I have decided (arbitrarily because there is no committee just yet) to trust the majority of people that previously posted to UKSW. If you're not one of them, I apologise now. It's not any reflection on who you are, or necessarily what you've posted, it's because I don't know you, or perhaps that I do know you and I can't trust you to stay on topic. If you can't live with that, just content yourself with reading the posts, or if that's not to your liking then I suggest that you mosey on back to UKSW and take it out on them. Straying off topic and killfiles will hopefully be a thing of the past, this forum is for people only interested to read about things pertaining to weather, climate and meteorology. What this forum needs if it is to survive and thrive are your posts, so keep them coming!

He is hardly management material, no offence intended but most people just aren't. You can't hope to float any enterprise without knowing exactly what you are doing and trusting people much more than he shows. Basing a forum on people who just want other people killed is somewhat American, is it not?



Well that didn't take long, 18 hours, must be a record.

--
Keith (Southend)
"Weather Home & Abroad"
http://www.southendweather.net
Twitter:@SS9Weatherman

On Sunday, 3 July 2016 13:56:06 UTC+1, Keith (Southend)G wrote:
On 03/07/2016 13:17, Weatherlawyer wrote:

He is hardly management material, no offence intended but most people just aren't. You can't hope to float any enterprise without knowing exactly what you are doing and trusting people much more than he shows. Basing a forum on people who just want other people killed is somewhat American, is it not?

Well that didn't take long, 18 hours, must be a record.

What part of the post are you referring to?
I really value the opinion of someone who has no idea what he is talking about.
But only because I don't know what you are talking about either.

On 03/07/2016 10:52, Alan White wrote:
Do I need to create a Google account to join?


Is anyone able to answer this question please?

"Metman2012" wrote in message ...

On 03/07/2016 10:52, Alan White wrote:
Do I need to create a Google account to join?
Is anyone able to answer this question please?

The answer seems to be yes. But it's simple and quick to get a Google
account - what's the problem?