The AGW's star in

'Some Like it Hot'

One of the funniest fictional movies in years *NOT* The Guardian



ouch.....


http://wattsupwiththat.com/2015/07/1...rature-record/

On Monday, July 20, 2015 at 11:49:10 PM UTC+3, Lawrence Jenkins wrote:
The AGW's star in

'Some Like it Hot'

One of the funniest fictional movies in years *NOT* The Guardian



ouch.....


http://wattsupwiththat.com/2015/07/1...rature-record/

See mitchell? Larry has accessed watts. He does it from time to time to cross-post denialist crap hence his missive about Martian CO2. There will probably be enough. There are enough anti science denialist posts on there to keep him going.

Understand now?

On Tuesday, July 21, 2015 at 10:31:47 AM UTC+1, Dawlish wrote:
On Monday, July 20, 2015 at 11:49:10 PM UTC+3, Lawrence Jenkins wrote:
The AGW's star in

'Some Like it Hot'

One of the funniest fictional movies in years *NOT* The Guardian



ouch.....


http://wattsupwiththat.com/2015/07/1...rature-record/

See mitchell? Larry has accessed watts. He does it from time to time to cross-post denialist crap hence his missive about Martian CO2. There will probably be enough. There are enough anti science denialist posts on there to keep him going.

Understand now?

This is not about Larry, though I know you prefer to set your own agendas. I am neither agreeing nor disagreeing with him, but, as said previously, he posts a load of tosh sometimes, like yourself.
I merely agreed with the principle that it's fine to ask questions, and his post isn't. Understand? (Clue, that's a question).
mitchell. You are just so childish.

On Tuesday, July 21, 2015 at 11:08:18 AM UTC+1, David Mitchell wrote:
On Tuesday, July 21, 2015 at 10:31:47 AM UTC+1, Dawlish wrote:
On Monday, July 20, 2015 at 11:49:10 PM UTC+3, Lawrence Jenkins wrote:
The AGW's star in

'Some Like it Hot'

One of the funniest fictional movies in years *NOT* The Guardian



ouch.....


http://wattsupwiththat.com/2015/07/1...rature-record/

See mitchell? Larry has accessed watts. He does it from time to time to cross-post denialist crap hence his missive about Martian CO2. There will probably be enough. There are enough anti science denialist posts on there to keep him going.

Understand now?

This is not about Larry, though I know you prefer to set your own agendas. I am neither agreeing nor disagreeing with him, but, as said previously, he posts a load of tosh sometimes, like yourself.

Apart from a disagreeable tendency to constantly label someone as an "idiot", I find Dawlish's posts amongst the most rational and sensible.

I merely agreed with the principle that it's fine to ask questions, and his post isn't. Understand? (Clue, that's a question).
mitchell. You are just so childish.

On Tuesday, 21 July 2015 13:04:59 UTC+1, Eimraw wrote:
f.

Apart from a disagreeable tendency to constantly label someone as an "idiot", I find Dawlish's posts amongst the most rational and sensible.

That's easy enough because he never actually says anything. Nothing original, controversial or challengeable at any rate.

Tudor Hughes, Warlingham, Surrey.

On Wednesday, July 22, 2015 at 7:19:33 AM UTC+3, Tudor Hughes wrote:
On Tuesday, 21 July 2015 13:04:59 UTC+1, Eimraw wrote:
f.

Apart from a disagreeable tendency to constantly label someone as an "idiot", I find Dawlish's posts amongst the most rational and sensible.

That's easy enough because he never actually says anything. Nothing original, controversial or challengeable at any rate.

Tudor Hughes, Warlingham, Surrey.

I say 'nothing controversial or challenging'. One of the most hilarious and ridiculous comments ever made in the newsgroup. I think very few would agree with your silly statement. *))

Apart from a disagreeable tendency to constantly label someone as an "idiot", I find Dawlish's posts amongst the most rational and sensible.

Is your name Warren?

In article ,
says...
Apart from a disagreeable tendency to constantly label someone as an "idiot", I find Dawlish's posts amongst the most rational and sensible.

Is your name Warren?


Looks like Warmie to me.....

--
Alan LeHun
Reply-to is valid. Add "BPSF" to subject: to bypass spam filters.

You understand me full well, but admitting I'm completely correct about larry is so far beyond you, it could be on the moon.

On Tuesday, July 21, 2015 at 1:30:50 PM UTC+1, Dawlish wrote:
You understand me full well, but admitting I'm completely correct about larry is so far beyond you, it could be on the moon.

I will never understand you. However I do understand the psychology behind your posts, just not the reason that prompts you to do so.

And if you bothered to read my posts you will have noted that I have agreed with you about Lawrence, not completely, but partially. Some of his posting is on the limits of absurdity, however, after reading his comments for many, many years on here, what he does have is an irony and sense of humour that you just don't get.

It's so ironic that you should be questioning a question, as answering them is something that you have consistently failed to achieve. And as someone involved in education, the fact that you are are questioning this right makes me worry for the standards we are setting.