Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) (uk.sci.weather) For the discussion of daily weather events, chiefly affecting the UK and adjacent parts of Europe, both past and predicted. The discussion is open to all, but contributions on a practical scientific level are encouraged. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
After the latest posting of contributor's address (I don't care if the address was genuine or not) this group is now totally scraping the barrel.
I'm out to join the many others who have been forced out by the idiots. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "MartinR" wrote in message ... After the latest posting of contributor's address (I don't care if the address was genuine or not) this group is now totally scraping the barrel. I'm out to join the many others who have been forced out by the idiots. Matin whlst I appreciate your sentiments and obviously concur with your misgivings ,I think its worth pointing out that many groups like this are populated by nutters ,misfits and probably perverts to boot ,most of us are purely interested in the sublect of weather and glean a lot from the the knowledgable contributions received daily. I killfile or just ignore the rants of those who try to dominate these hallowed halls, and try to just enjoy the really good stuff we get most of the time, please keep contributing ,ignore the corrosive dross,and don't run away like so many of our previous esteemed contributors. Don't let the freaks take over ! Nil desperandum illigitimi desperandum, as they used to say in the RAF . RonB |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wednesday, October 23, 2013 4:40:56 PM UTC+1, ron button wrote:
"MartinR" wrote in message ... After the latest posting of contributor's address (I don't care if the address was genuine or not) this group is now totally scraping the barrel. I'm out to join the many others who have been forced out by the idiots. Matin whlst I appreciate your sentiments and obviously concur with your misgivings ,I think its worth pointing out that many groups like this are populated by nutters ,misfits and probably perverts to boot ,most of us are purely interested in the sublect of weather and glean a lot from the the knowledgable contributions received daily. I killfile or just ignore the rants of those who try to dominate these hallowed halls, and try to just enjoy the really good stuff we get most of the time, please keep contributing ,ignore the corrosive dross,and don't run away like so many of our previous esteemed contributors. Don't let the freaks take over ! Nil desperandum illigitimi desperandum, as they used to say in the RAF . RonB I take your point Ron but posting an address brings the virtual nastiness right out into the real world. It is the final straw for me as it suggests that there might be face-to-face confrontation, people or even families at risk from anything from stalking to actual violence. I can't be a part of that. I could take the nutters, denialists, irrationalists, and others of their ilk, but not actual physical threats, whether explicit or implied. I will continue to lurk but will not post again except maybe to report unusual weather events. I didn't contribute much but I am former MetO employee who retains an interest in the weather, I'm sorry to leave. MartinR |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "MartinR" wrote in message ... After the latest posting of contributor's address (I don't care if the address was genuine or not) this group is now totally scraping the barrel. Slightly surprised to see it was Joe Eggington, I know he's locked horns with Dawlish before but he wouldn't have expected that. I'm out to join the many others who have been forced out by the idiots. The killfile is the only way. You can't reason with them, you can't bargain with them and they absolutely will *not* stop until they have destroyed this group. I don't know why I even bother to try to be honest, perhaps it's just the sheer exasperation of seeing yet another thread wrecked by what is just a very small group of people. -- Col Bolton, Lancashire 160m asl Snow videos: http://www.youtube.com/channel/UC3QvmL4UWBmHFMKWiwYm_gg |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I agree with those sentiments. I think this borders on harrassment of
an individual, which is a criminal offence. If that was me, I would be seeking legal advice. It is very sad that the internet is becoming a refuge for the nasty individuals who believe they are immune from prosecution. I think that recent events on Twitter havr proved this idea to be very misguided, as well as cruel. |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wednesday, 23 October 2013 18:10:47 UTC+1, yttiw wrote:
I agree with those sentiments. I think this borders on harrassment of an individual, which is a criminal offence. If that was me, I would be seeking legal advice. It is very sad that the internet is becoming a refuge for the nasty individuals who believe they are immune from prosecution. I think that recent events on Twitter havr proved this idea to be very misguided, as well as cruel. Sorry but that post was very confusing. Who is being harassed and who are the nasty indivduals |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2013-10-23 17:17:46 +0000, Lawrence Jenkins said:
On Wednesday, 23 October 2013 18:10:47 UTC+1, yttiw wrote: I agree with those sentiments. I think this borders on harrassment of an individual, which is a criminal offence. If that was me, I would be seeking legal advice. It is very sad that the internet is becoming a refuge for the nasty individuals who believe they are immune from prosecution. I think that recent events on Twitter havr proved this idea to be very misguided, as well as cruel. Sorry but that post was very confusing. Who is being harassed and who are the nasty indivduals Getting worried are we? Under the Protection from Harassment Act 1997: "A person must not pursue a course of conduct • "(a) which amounts to harassment of another, and • "(b) which he knows or ought to know amounts to harassment of the other."[1] That definition is open to interpretation. The nasty individuals are ones that think they can get away with regular personal insults of others on the many and varied internet forums, message boards, social media sites, etc,. |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wednesday, 23 October 2013 18:39:24 UTC+1, yttiw wrote:
On 2013-10-23 17:17:46 +0000, Lawrence Jenkins said: On Wednesday, 23 October 2013 18:10:47 UTC+1, yttiw wrote: I agree with those sentiments. I think this borders on harrassment of an individual, which is a criminal offence. If that was me, I would be seeking legal advice. It is very sad that the internet is becoming a refuge for the nasty individuals who believe they are immune from prosecution. I think that recent events on Twitter havr proved this idea to be very misguided, as well as cruel. Sorry but that post was very confusing. Who is being harassed and who are the nasty indivduals Getting worried are we? Under the Protection from Harassment Act 1997: "A person must not pursue a course of conduct • "(a) which amounts to harassment of another, and • "(b) which he knows or ought to know amounts to harassment of the other."[1] That definition is open to interpretation. The nasty individuals are ones that think they can get away with regular personal insults of others on the many and varied internet forums, message boards, social media sites, etc,. Why would I get worried I've never bullied anyone and the only time I've reacted towards anyone is when they've been personally nasty to me because they didn't like what I'd said , not about an individual but a subject. The worst I've ever done is a gentle leg pull to a pee take. However I would be mortified to think that I'd ever initiated nastiness towards anyone that wasn't a response to the first instance. Any example you can show me , who ever you are, I will always show that I countered a nasty remark. As for the person who it seems you're are reluctant to name as apparently somehow the victim, is in fact the nastiest person ever to stalk this NG . There has never been a man who upset so many good people and I don't include myself in that group, no people like Will, Tudor the late Mike Tullet plus many others. So unless you are another Dawlish sock puppet, which can only explain your suggestion that I'm getting worried, then you need to understand that you post is essentially about the bully being exposed not being bullied. |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
ron button wrote:
"MartinR" wrote in message ... After the latest posting of contributor's address (I don't care if the address was genuine or not) this group is now totally scraping the barrel. I'm out to join the many others who have been forced out by the idiots. Matin whlst I appreciate your sentiments and obviously concur with your misgivings ,I think its worth pointing out that many groups like this are populated by nutters ,misfits and probably perverts to boot ,most of us are purely interested in the sublect of weather and glean a lot from the the knowledgable contributions received daily. I killfile or just ignore the rants of those who try to dominate these hallowed halls, and try to just enjoy the really good stuff we get most of the time, please keep contributing ,ignore the corrosive dross,and don't run away like so many of our previous esteemed contributors. Don't let the freaks take over ! Nil desperandum illigitimi desperandum, as they used to say in the RAF . RonB ----------------------------------------------- I more or less agree with Ron and Col but am deeply upset by the violent tone and veiled threats to a family by posting an address. ZZebowa is the perpetrator and egged on by the usual people who have a vendetta agaist Dawlish on the grounds that he is patronising, sometimes rude when provoked and has views they don't agree with. That is not sufficient for me for the level of hatred. As just about the longest serving remaining member on here I am hanging on by a thread (no pun intended)to think it is worthwhile. I just don't want to give in to those whose prime intention is to ruin the Group. If you don't know who you are you are the ones who supported the sentiments of the original poster and as the decent people I thought you were you should be ashamed. People think that Dawlish is the reason for so many people leaving but I have it first hand that others have left for different reasons, right back as far as Philip Eden and they are not for the reasons that people like to propagate on here. Dave |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 23/10/2013 18:06, Col wrote:
"MartinR" wrote in message ... After the latest posting of contributor's address (I don't care if the address was genuine or not) this group is now totally scraping the barrel. Slightly surprised to see it was Joe Eggington, I know he's locked horns with Dawlish before but he wouldn't have expected that. I'm out to join the many others who have been forced out by the idiots. The killfile is the only way. You can't reason with them, you can't bargain with them and they absolutely will *not* stop until they have destroyed this group. I don't know why I even bother to try to be honest, perhaps it's just the sheer exasperation of seeing yet another thread wrecked by what is just a very small group of people. I'm totally exasperated with dullish and his arrogant rantings. If posting his home address brings him to book, to behave civilised and respect people then so be it. I thought it was time to name and shame the bully. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Now that is a Surprise: The Met Office’s temperature forecasts issued in 12 out of the last 13 years have been too warm | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
The Royal Society: too little, too late | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
Group promoting climate change has extensive ties to banking, socalists and communits | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
Thaw has now reached Brussels too | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
CB radio: a metaphor for what this group has become | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) |