http://my.opera.com/Weatherlawyer/bl...w.dml/37401472

I just worked out what to look for in Vietnamese typhoons or maybe
even Asian Pacific storms in general.

I can't believe it was that easy.
I mean it was a doddle.
Honestly.

On Nov 9, 5:55*pm, Weatherlawyer wrote:
http://my.opera.com/Weatherlawyer/bl...w.dml/37401472

I just worked out what to look for in Vietnamese typhoons or maybe
even Asian Pacific storms in general.

I can't believe it was that easy.
I mean it was a doddle.
Honestly.

now try the scissors

On Nov 10, 1:55*am, Weatherlawyer wrote:
http://my.opera.com/Weatherlawyer/bl...w.dml/37401472

I just worked out what to look for in Vietnamese typhoons or maybe
even Asian Pacific storms in general.

From the Wikipedia:
Recurrence, the approximate return of a system towards its initial
conditions, together with sensitive dependence on initial conditions,
are the two main ingredients for chaotic motion. They have the
practical consequence of making complex systems, such as the weather,
difficult to predict past a certain time range (approximately a week
in the case of weather), since it is impossible to measure the
starting atmospheric conditions completely accurately.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Butterfly_effect

And when it gets bent it looks like this:
http://www.woksat.info/etcsjasxx/asxx10100100.html

All this:
http://groups.google.com/group/uk.sc...8b77d194c5078#
talk of bigger computers... It is not necessary once you realise that
the North Atlantic has a static set-up, from which all the different
times of phases merely drag the systems to different longitudes.

When they get badly upset you know to look for more than that in the
mix. Then it all becomes a little less foggy.

Once you understand the amplitude changes and their causes, you are
literally on your bike. It really couldn't be a simpler system.