Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) (uk.sci.weather) For the discussion of daily weather events, chiefly affecting the UK and adjacent parts of Europe, both past and predicted. The discussion is open to all, but contributions on a practical scientific level are encouraged. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jan 18, 4:51*pm, Dawlish wrote:
On Jan 18, 11:27*am, " wrote: On Jan 8, 8:13*pm, " wrote: * * Will the 22 January be sufficient? Let me * * *know if you need mote time? http://pubs.giss.nasa.gov/docs/1967/...Matsushima.pdf This is about the most damning article ever published to AGW. Hansen wrote this before the false theory of greenhouse gases was regurgitated by theoretical scientists. This article proves; a) The concept of greenhouse gases is not supported by any modern science. It was not a part of theoretical science at the time of this article or Hansen would have had to account for the effects of the gases of the atmosphere, WHICH HE DOES NOT. b) It proves any use of the term 'greenhouse gas' is not valid and the propaganda of algore and others is crminal fraud. c) It proves Hansen to be the charlatan that he is. Here he falsifies theoretical physics to his end conclusion that it is dust in the atmosphere of Venus that is causing the high temperatures. He discounts the other theories of 'clouds' and gases of CO2 or H2O. Eventually among the theoretical assholes, the idea of greenhouse gases won out for the explanation of the temperature of Venus. Now this is pointed to as scientific proof of the concept. There is NO SCIENCE in this and NO SCIENCE in this article from Hansen, or any other articles from Hansen. Hansen is a fraud and charlatan, and careful analysis of his work shows this clearly. ---------------- http://search.barnesandnoble.com/Gen...s-Carl-Pauling... In this book from a Nobel Laureate in chemistry from the 1950's, a complete analysis of gases is given in which all laboratory evidence of gases is acknowledged up to this time. This analysis of gases precludes and proves the concept of greenhouse gases invalid. A simple analysis of gases and the energy that can be transfered by gases, proves the concept that some gases are 'transparent' or 'non- reactive' to infrared radiation to be invalid, and accounting of the energy transfered by infrared radiation shows that the inordinate absorption claimed from CO2 and methane to be completely false and erroneous. Scientific proof that the EPA's ratings for 'greenhouse gases' is invalid and criminal in application to any application of law. The theoretical beliefs of 'scientists' means nothing in direct view of direct science. ====== You should know by my posts, that my postition is that all of the scientists of AGW are pure charlatan's. They and the theoretical physicists that accomadate their bull**** theory are charlatans. There is absolutely no science or theoretical science for AGW. There is absolutely no effect upon climate from humans, and proper science can PROVE this fact. The daily operation of these charlatan's is to falsify, omit and distort any actual science for thier false conclusions. Their motive for this is initially personal advancement and then for the sheer embezzlement of public funding this falsification of science brings them. The email from Phil Jones in which he is warning the other top comrades in proxies that he has altered their studies according to Mann's method of 'mining' the data points that fit the curve that is wanted, shows that this is a conspiracy. In this email, P Jones shows that he is conscious of the forgery of M Mann of the hockey stick graph, which was accepted and the main operatiing graph of the IPCC for a long time, and basically is still their graph which they presented at Copenhagen. He then states that he is using this manner of forgery himself. It is clear that he has also forged and falsified the world temperature statistics of the CRU. This was the most complete record of world statistics. GISS and NOAA and the Met Office, use these statistics of which they only recieve the 'modified' versions. Phil Jones, (the self incriminated forger) had complete control over these statistics and their hard copies. *Now we find out the hard copies have been destroyed. And it is claimed that when CRU moved their computers, the intial computer code of these records was also lost. So now we must only depend upon the integrity of P Jones for the accuracy of the records and their modifications or corrections. This means that all of the continued use of science based upon or using this data is fraudulent, and those doing so are criminally and civially liable for this fraud and aggresion against people and nations. The complaceny of people willing to accept the fraud of these theoretical scientists will someday fade, and they will be held rightfully to their criminal and civil liability for their falsified science. KD The level of tosh has gone up a gear**. There is a high probability* that in 10-20 years you will have been shown to be entirely wrong and that you will wonder what on earth prompted you to rail against all this inmagined climate conspiracy in this way. *probability, as there is an outside chance you may be correct. I don't think you are, but certainty is not something I'm prepared to deal in! **any chance of keeping this stuff to your own little group instead of cross posting it? If I'd wanted to dip into those other 4 newsgroups to see what you'd written, I would do. Hey! Why not post it to all the newsgroups; imagine then the amount of people who would be able to see the truth! Don't pay any mind to deathrage. He's a cent or two short of a dollar. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jan 18, 8:56*am, JohnM wrote:
On Jan 18, 4:51*pm, Dawlish wrote: On Jan 18, 11:27*am, " wrote: Don't pay any mind to deathrage. He's a cent or two short of a dollar.- So asshole, explain why you idiots are so against methane emissions? Cows eat grass and make methane. If they did not eat this grass, this grass would decay and make methane anyway. Cows are ablsolute carbon neutral, yet you idiots are all in a rage to tax cows and all livestock. ****ING IDIOTS This is also true of landfills. All the organic matter would also be decomposed into methane and then CO2. Only carbon pumped out of the earth is not carbon neutral. Also methane offsets are absolutely stupid. Methane only exists for 10-12 years in the atmosphere. And then is converted naturally to CO2 and water. Selling offests for 'flaring' methane is sheer idiocy. KD |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
More denialist crap | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
1967 - 1968 - 1969 Weather Mags | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
Buy Belfort DigiWx AWOS CRAP and you'll have Belfort DigiWx AWOS CRAP | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
13/14 July 1967 | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
1967 | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) |