Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) (uk.sci.weather) For the discussion of daily weather events, chiefly affecting the UK and adjacent parts of Europe, both past and predicted. The discussion is open to all, but contributions on a practical scientific level are encouraged. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ian Botham at Lords just said (words more or less correct):
"The sun's out and it's heating up. Hope that doesn't trigger thunderstorms. It's very humid". I have previously heard Ian make some of the better and more informed comments about cricket weather and has avoided drawing the all-too- often erroneous conclusion that the clouds "are high so it's unlikely to rain". Well done Sir Ian. Jack |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Jack )" wrote in
: Ian Botham at Lords just said (words more or less correct): "The sun's out and it's heating up. Hope that doesn't trigger thunderstorms. It's very humid". I have previously heard Ian make some of the better and more informed comments about cricket weather and has avoided drawing the all-too- often erroneous conclusion that the clouds "are high so it's unlikely to rain". Well done Sir Ian. Shame he can't be so insightful with his cricketing commentary contributions !! Richard |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 31 Aug, 22:51, Richard Dixon wrote:
Shame he can't be so insightful with his cricketing commentary contributions !! Personal opinion that. His commentaries are on a par with the best - unlike some others who are simply boring old f*rts. Jack. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jack ) wrote:
On 31 Aug, 22:51, Richard Dixon wrote: Shame he can't be so insightful with his cricketing commentary contributions !! Personal opinion that. His commentaries are on a par with the best - unlike some others who are simply boring old f*rts. And some are boring young f*rts. I think Nick Knight realises it at times and so his voice gradually fades away in embarrassment when he's off on one of his rambles. I usually like Michael Holding's comments but the other day he wondered why Foster was standing up to the wicket for one Essex medium-pacer but not the other. I e-mailed Sky to suggest the reason might be that one of the medium-pacers, Napier, was bowling at 90 mph. -- Graham P Davis, Bracknell, Berks., UK. E-mail: newsman not newsboy |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I usually like Michael Holding's comments but the other day he wondered
why Foster was standing up to the wicket for one Essex medium-pacer but not the other. I e-mailed Sky to suggest the reason might be that one of the medium-pacers, Napier, was bowling at 90 mph. -- Graham P Davis, Bracknell, Berks., UK. E-mail: newsman not newsboy ------------------ .............. and should be in the 20/20 England team when you add his batting to that. Dave |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote in message ... On 31 Aug, 22:51, Richard Dixon wrote: Shame he can't be so insightful with his cricketing commentary contributions !! Personal opinion that. His commentaries are on a par with the best - unlike some others who are simply boring old f*rts. Jack. ----------------------- I think he has improved a lot lately. He used to come accross as arrogant and implied that it was all better in his day. Seems to have mellowed somewhat. Dave |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Graham P Davis writes: I usually like Michael Holding's comments but the other day he wondered why Foster was standing up to the wicket for one Essex medium-pacer but not the other. I e-mailed Sky to suggest the reason might be that one of the medium-pacers, Napier, was bowling at 90 mph. Given the speed at which Holding himself bowled, maybe he views 90 mph as medium pace. ![]() -- John Hall "Hegel was right when he said that we learn from history that man can never learn anything from history." George Bernard Shaw (1856-1950) |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Jack )" wrote in
: Personal opinion that. His commentaries are on a par with the best - unlike some others who are simply boring old f*rts. Of course personal opinion but I feel Atherton and Hussain are streets ahead (more intelligent for starters). Botham has a history of contradicting himself. On the plus side, he's better than Bob Willis! Richard |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
in 36628 20080901 222915 Richard Dixon wrote:
"Jack )" wrote in : Personal opinion that. His commentaries are on a par with the best - unlike some others who are simply boring old f*rts. Of course personal opinion but I feel Atherton and Hussain are streets ahead (more intelligent for starters). Botham has a history of contradicting himself. On the plus side, he's better than Bob Willis! Richard Name someone who isn't better than Willis. I flinch every time he speaks. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Sir Piers backs Sir James Delingpoles exposure of the global warming LIE | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
Sir Piers slaps down Sir David for spouting nonsense on climate change | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
[OT] Cricket and the weather | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
Ian Currie's forecasts | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
Weatherpictures - Ian Collins - anyone know of whereabouts? | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) |