Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) (uk.sci.weather) For the discussion of daily weather events, chiefly affecting the UK and adjacent parts of Europe, both past and predicted. The discussion is open to all, but contributions on a practical scientific level are encouraged. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() On Nov 4, 1:16 pm, "Lawrence Jenkins" wrote: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/6115644.stm Thanks for putting that up, Lawrence, and well spoken, Mike Hulme. No comment needed; just read it. Tudor Hughes |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Tudor Hughes wrote:
On Nov 4, 1:16 pm, "Lawrence Jenkins" wrote: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/6115644.stm Thanks for putting that up, Lawrence, and well spoken, Mike Hulme. No comment needed; just read it. I did - very good. Perhaps the ostriches, as well as the armageddonists, will take note. -- Gianna |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Gianna" wrote in message ... Tudor Hughes wrote: On Nov 4, 1:16 pm, "Lawrence Jenkins" wrote: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/6115644.stm Thanks for putting that up, Lawrence, and well spoken, Mike Hulme. No comment needed; just read it. I did - very good. Perhaps the ostriches, as well as the armageddonists, will take note. -- Gianna See I told you I wasn't mad. |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
First well balanced GW article I think I've read.
"Lawrence Jenkins" wrote in message ... "Gianna" wrote in message ... Tudor Hughes wrote: On Nov 4, 1:16 pm, "Lawrence Jenkins" wrote: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/6115644.stm Thanks for putting that up, Lawrence, and well spoken, Mike Hulme. No comment needed; just read it. I did - very good. Perhaps the ostriches, as well as the armageddonists, will take note. -- Gianna See I told you I wasn't mad. |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
STUART ONYECHE wrote:
First well balanced GW article I think I've read. I'll second that as well. The problem I have, is now that the politicians and activists have got on their band-wagons on the subject any balanced and rational approach to the solving the problem have gone right out the window, it's a lost cause already :-( -- Keith (Southend) http://www.southendweather.net e-mail: kreh at southendweather dot net |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() GiannaSee I told you I wasn't mad- Of course you're mad; you're just in remission. :-) The Rutland closes at the end of the month, BTW. The landlady is retiring and has sold it to a property developer. Last one out set the detonators. Tudor Hughes |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Lawrence Jenkins wrote: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/6115644.stm Seems about right to me, and I'd consider myself an environmentalist. Graham Penzance |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Lawrence Jenkins wrote:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/6115644.stm An interesting perspective. With such an emotive, and undoubtedly important issue such as climate change, we should put our personal 'agendas' (e.g. left vrs. right, green vrs. black, male vrs, female, capitalist vrs. communist etc...) to one side and let the best peer reviewed science speak. No 'spin', no egos, no unnecessary emotion, but also no denial or sticking ones head in the sand. Regards, Richard. Dartington, South Hams. |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Lawrence Jenkins wrote: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/6115644.stm I can't say I read all the way through the page. What happened this year is that the normal British weather and presumably the same for the Americas, was hijacked by a severe series of typhoons running from April to October. I am skeptical about the cause being glowballs but I don't remember denying the fact either. My reason for skepticism is that these conditions occurred in centuries when men were considerably thinner on the ground than they are these days. Such centuries including times when the agricultural practices were put under great stress by politicians. Notably the tree taxes of the Roman Empire. If ice-core physics is a successful branch of science, such disasterous cycles took place in mainly agrarian communities. Certainly no CFCs were involved and little over-production of CO2. But that is just my opinion. Here's another one: I do like your posts when they refrain from carrying anything you say. And I agree with the so called expert on the subject of the major problems in Global Warming being the advocates for change. It isn't gas emissions and it isn't even the more likely causes: the building of dams, conversion of marshland and deforestry etc.. The advocates of Glowballs are a right PITA and extremist in nature too. I wonder they aren't recruited by the CIA or Taliban or some such. They really are emotional coils. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Making Sense of the chart | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
Top meteoroligist talks sense on GW scare stories | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
A sense of perspective on Global warming, hopefully! | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
I sense a whiff of doubt | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
BBC Weather Centre Sees Common Sense at Last | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) |