Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) (sci.geo.meteorology) For the discussion of meteorology and related topics. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thursday, November 13, 2014 5:00:43 AM UTC-8, Martin Brown wrote:
However, water dimers have recently been demonstrated to exist in trace amounts under conditions that are not far off those in the atmosphere. It's not clear IMO, that that exact conclusion is both accurate and comprehensive. Their "measurement" is indirect and, from what I can tell, dependent on assumptions that are unproven/unprovable. At best they can say they have detected multimers (not dimers, dimers being only 2 H2O molecules conjoined by one hydrogen bond) which is what I anticipated they would detect. For example, did you notice this: "There is one puzzling aspect of the results, however: the measured absorption peaks were four times broader than those predicted by computer modelling. The researchers speculate that the reason may lie in the simplifying assumptions . . . ?" How do you interpret that statement? And they are not the first to detect such. Take a look at this paper: http://goo.gl/akcmGJ My conclusion: They have not detected dimers. They have detected multimers, probably no less than 10 per clump/droplet. But since they don't know how to distinguish between multimers they've just assumed dimers--because that seems less controversial. http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/...ric-conditions Actually quite an elegant experiment. LOL. How would you know? No details were provided. The article is based on the abstract. Don't pretend like you see what was not presented. (You might as well be talking about the fine weaving of the emperor's new clothes.) There are no monomers in our atmosphere. Cold steam is nothing but an urban myths. And here is the reason why: http://wp.me/p4JijN-9l Not that this affects the general point that most water vapour is present as molecular H2O and it is only when the atmosphere is super saturated and nuclei are about that some of it forms into clouds. Urban myth. Calling it a "general point" is a dishonest rhetorical tactic. Pretending you see what has never been detected is amateurish and petty. Monomers have never been detected in earth's atmosphere. Prove me wrong. Before you respond take a deep breath and acknowledge the fact that, as I just stated, "Monomers have never been detected in earth's atmosphere." Science isn't about what you believe. It's about what you can demonstrate empirically. Do you agree, Martin? |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Dilemma of Differentness | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
Plants' global warming dilemma: climb to escape heat or stoop for water? | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
Southern limit of east Oz cyclones [Was: Moral Dilemma] | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
dilemma for Gianna | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
CAVOK dilemma | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) |