Why I don't consider claims of consensus to be a valid argument in ascientific discipline

Why do I not consider claims of consensus to be a
valid argument in a scientific discipline?

Because I am not an idiot.

Only an idiot would not realize that the methods of
science were developed for the express purpose of
allowing us modern humans to break free from the
intellectually stultifying effects of consensus through
the ages.

Claudius Denk
http://www.solvingtornadoes.org

Reply With Quote

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version	Search this Thread: Advanced Search
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Threaded Mode

Posting Rules
Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is Off Trackbacks are On Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Not a 97% consensus, but a 99.9% consensus	Dawlish	uk.sci.weather (UK Weather)	18	June 19th 15 10:07 PM
Consider the source! WAS: Fossil Fuels Fail . . .	Roger Coppock	sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology)	0	April 14th 09 02:09 AM
WARNING - If you don't like Red Sunsets DON'T Look ;-) 3 of 4	Edward Erbeck	alt.binaries.pictures.weather (Weather Photos)	0	March 14th 08 06:36 AM
WARNING - If you don't like Red Sunsets DON'T Look ;-) 2 of 4	Edward Erbeck	alt.binaries.pictures.weather (Weather Photos)	0	March 14th 08 06:35 AM
WARNING - If you don't like Red Sunsets DON'T Look ;-) 1 of 4	Edward Erbeck	alt.binaries.pictures.weather (Weather Photos)	0	March 14th 08 06:33 AM

All times are GMT. The time now is 05:50 AM.

Menu

About Us