In message . com,
Spartan613 writes
"Peter Webb" wrote in message
. au...
If the stream changes course, or ice melt forces it deeper,
its effective heat-carrying capacity will change.

And that could be a problem for some parts of Europe.


Yeah. Cooling apparently.

AGW can't lose. If temperatures go up, its due to CO2 increases. If
they go down, its due to ocean currents changing as a result of CO2.
they stay the same, its proof that the heating from CO2 is exactly
offset by ocean current changes due to CO2.

Temperature goes up, goes down, or stays the same; whatever actually
happens it is a prediction of climate "science". You AGW believers
can't fail; you predict every possible outcome then whatever happens
is more proof of AGW.

Or, in astrology speak ... "You will meet a tall dark stranger. Or
maybe you won't. That will be $10 please".

Nicely put.

But completely wrong.

It's been long known that AGW will cause some areas of the planet will
warm and some to cool locally, that is why the result is often referred
to as "climate change" rather than "global warming". Warming is the
overall problem but the actual impact it has varies depending on local
conditions.

What Peter is doing is deliberately mixing up the predictions for local
conditions with global predictions in order to create a strawman version
of AGW theory to fight against.

The creationists do the same when they say that the theory of evolution
predicts that dogs will give birth to cats. Same tactic.
--
ICQ #17887309 * Save the net *
Grok: http://spam.abuse.net http://www.cauce.org * nuke a spammer *
Find: http://www.samspade.org http://www.netdemon.net * today *
Kill: http://mail-abuse.com http://au.sorbs.net http://spamhaus.org