"James" wrote:
"Roger Coppock" wrote:
“Our paper is among the first to show that CO2 concentrations and
the temperature varied hand in hand in that time,� says Peter Bijl
http://sciencemagazine.com/search.ph...gazine&append=

Doesn't mean co2 caused it. Especially if co2 follows temps.

Nowhere in the text that Roger posted does it say that CO2 rose first,
causing temps to increase. This is the same deconstructing done by Al
Gore. They say "temps and CO2 rise hand in hand", which of course
does NOT say "CO2 rise caused temps to warm". You need to parse the
words of these creeps, they're merely trying to keep up the background
chorus of "AGW caused by CO2". It's inept propaganda, but it's all
they have left now that science has shown them to be full of ****.
--
): "I may make you feel, but I can't make you think"
(: Off the monitor, through the modem, nothing but net