Muslim loving right wing terrorists want to be dependent on Muslim Oil forever.

Rightists are terrorists who hate America.

Felonious Theft of Emails And Subsequent Overblown Denialist Rhetoric Heralded
As Great Breakthrough By Islamic Terrorists And Other Friends of The Climate
Change Denial Movement

And who can blame them, given that many of them were relegated to the fringe
years ago?

I suspect that most mainstream media will not buy the overblown rhetoric. After
all, it is ridiculous to assert that stolen emails from a few climate
scientists somehow refutes decades of research by thousands of experts.

Rightists are in league with our fundamentalist Islamic terrorist enemies by
standing against the continued development of high tech alternatives to their
shamless addiction to muslim oil. It is the so-called Libertarians and
socialist Conservatives who are the biggest threat because they kow tow and
pander to their oil conglomerate masters, they are slaves. Oil Man deposed
despot George W. Bush held hands while on long romantic walks with Saudi King
Abdullah, allowing them free passage from the USA on 9/11, despite how the
attackers that day were Saudis. Radical rightist Republican Senator James
Inhofe has received over $1 million in "donations" from the oil industry in
return for his support of Muslim terrorism and the subsequent death of American
soldiers caused by AGW denial and support of Islamic oil. The right is
against choice and freedom, demanding that we continue on the course of
unsustainable oil gluttony; mainly because they are fat and shiftless, with
tiny
brains and low I. Q.s.

Fueling Terror

"...the hijackers, 15 hijackers who are Saudis, they studied this thinking --
destructive thinking -- in Saudi Arabia. They spent a few months in
Afghanistan.
But they lived their life, they studied this in government mosques. [..]
Government curriculum inspired what happened in New York." - PBS interview with
Ali Al-Ahmed, executive director of the Saudi Institute
Much has been reported about the complex system of terrorist financing and the
money trail facilitating the September 11 terror attacks. Individuals and
charities from the Persian Gulf--mainly from Saudi Arabia--appear to be the
most
important source of funding for terrorist organizations like Al-Qaeda.
According
to an October 2002 Council on Foreign Relations report of an Independent Task
Force on Terrorist Financing, Osama bin Laden and his men have been able to
accumulate millions of dollars using legitimate businesses such as charities,
nongovernmental organizations, mosques, banks and other financial institutions
to help raise and move their funds.

How does it work? Take Saudi Arabia for example. This Gulf monarchy is a
rentier
state in which no taxes are imposed on the population. Instead, Saudis have a
religious tax, the zakat, requiring all Muslims to give at least 2.5 percent of
their income to charities. Many of the charities are truly dedicated to good
causes, but others merely serve as money laundering and terrorist financing
apparatuses. While many Saudis contribute to those charities in good faith
believing their money goes toward good causes, others know full well the
terrorist purposes to which their money will be funneled.

What makes penetration and control of money transactions in the Arab world
especially difficult is the Hawala system--the unofficial method of
transferring
money and one of the key elements in the financing of global terrorism. The
system has been going for generations and is deeply embedded in the Arab
culture. Hawala transactions are based on trust; they are carried out verbally
leaving no paper trail.

The Saudi regime has been complicit in its people's actions and has turned a
blind eye to the phenomenon of wealthy citizens sending money to charities that
in turn route it to terror organizations. Furthermore, Saudi government money
funneled into madrassas where radical anti-Americanism is propagated has been
instrumental in creating an ideological climate which generates terrorism.
Former CIA director James Woolsey described the Saudi-sponsored Wahhabism and
Islamist extremism as "the soil in which Al-Qaeda and its sister terrorist
organizations are flourishing."

Barrels and bombs
It is no coincidence that so much of the cash filling terrorists' coffers come
from the oil monarchies in the Persian Gulf. It is also no coincidence that
those countries holding the world's largest oil reserves and those generating
most of their income from oil exports, are also those with the strongest
support
for radical Islam. In fact, oil and terrorism are entangled. If not for the
West's oil money, most Gulf states would not have had the wealth that allowed
them to invest so much in arms procurement and sponsor terrorists
organizations.

Consider Saudi Arabia. Oil revenues make up around 90-95% of total Saudi export
earnings, 70%-80% of state revenues, and around 40% of the country's gross
domestic product (GDP). In 2002 alone, Saudi Arabia earned nearly $55 billion
in
crude oil export revenues. Most wealthy Saudis who sponsor charities and
educational foundations that preach religious intolerance and hate toward the
Western values have made their money from the petroleum industry or its
subsidiaries. Osama bin Laden's wealth comes from the family's construction
company that made its fortune from government contracts financed by oil money.
It is also oil money that enables Saudi Arabia to invest approximately 40% of
its income on weapons procurement. In July 2005 undersecretary of the Treasury
Stuart Levey testifying in the Senate noted ?Wealthy Saudi financiers and
charities have funded terrorist organizations and causes that support terrorism
and the ideology that fuels the terrorists' agenda. Even today, we believe that
Saudi donors may still be a significant source of terrorist financing,
including
for the insurgency in Iraq."

If Saudi Arabia is the financial engine of radical Sunni Islam, its neighbor
Iran is the powerhouse behind the proliferation of radical Shiite Islam. Iran,
OPEC?s second largest oil producer, is holder of 10 percent of the world?s
proven oil reserves and has the world?s second largest natural gas reserve.
With
oil and gas revenues constituting over 80 percent of its total export earning
and 50 percent of its gross domestic product, Iran is heavily dependent on
petrodollars. It is a hotbed of Islamic fundamentalism and supporter of some of
the world?s most radical Islamic movements such as the Lebanese Hizballah.
Iran?s mullahs are fully aware of the power of their oil. Its supreme leader
Ayatollah Ali Khamenei warned in 2002: ?If the West did not receive oil, their
factories would grind to a halt. This will shake the world!? As the world?s
demand for oil increases, Iran grows richer --Iran?s oil revenues have jumped
25
percent in 2005?and more than able to snub the U.S. and its allies in their
efforts to prevent Tehran from developing nuclear weapons.

The line between the barrel and the bomb is clear. It is oil wealth that
enables
dictatorial regimes to sustain themselves, resisting openness, progress and
power sharing. Some semi-feudal royal families in the Gulf buy their legitimacy
from the Muslim religious establishment. This establishment uses oil money to
globally propagate hostility to the West, modernity, non-Muslims, and women.
This trend is likely to continue. Both the International Energy Agency and the
Energy Information Agency of the U.S. Department of Energy currently project a
steady increase in world demand for oil through at least 2020. This means
further enrichment of the oil-producing countries and continued access of
terrorist groups to a viable financial network which allow then remain a lethal
threat to the U.S. and its allies.

Drying the swamp
There are many strategies proposed by counter-terrorism experts to obstruct
terrorist financing. Many of them are effective and, indeed, some of the steps
that have been taken since September 11, such as freezing bank accounts and
improving the scrutiny over international monetary transfers, contributed to a
reduction in Al-Qaeda's financial maneuverability. But the only way to deal
with
the problem strategically is to reduce the disposable income and wealth
generation capacity of terrorist supporters.

Hence, America's best weapon against terrorism is to decrease its dependency on
foreign oil by increasing its fuel efficiency and introducing next-generation
fuels. If the U.S. bought less oil, the global oil market would shrink and
price
per-barrel would decline. This would invalidate the social contract between the
leaders and their people and stem the flow of resources to the religious
establishment. It will likely increase popular pressure for political
participation, modernity and reformed political and social institutions.

Reducing demand for Middle East oil would force the petroleum-rich regimes to
invest their funds domestically, seek ways to diversify their economies and
rethink their support for America's enemies. Only then financial support for
terrorism could radically diminish.