On Wed, 24 Jun 2009 09:59:18 -0700, Roger Coppock wrote:

On Jun 22, 1:58Â*pm, Peter Muehlbauer
wrote: [ . . . ]
Roger, WHO THE **** is interested in a "statistical significance" from
a chaotic system?

Scientists.

Only those who don't understand the math.

Eric Gisin wrote:
http://www.onlineopinion.com.au/view...le=9075&page=0

By Bob Carter, David Evans, Stewart Franks and Bill Kininmonth.

HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW

On Jun 22, 2:13*pm, "Ouroboros Rex" wrote:
Eric Gisin wrote:
http://www.onlineopinion.com.au/view...le=9075&page=0

By Bob Carter, David Evans, Stewart Franks and Bill Kininmonth.

HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW

James Hansen, (Embarrassed his former boss, earns hundreds of
thousands promoting Gorebull Warming., An astromomer, not a
Climatologist),

Al Gore, (Earning millions promoting Gorebull Warming. Jets around the
world, lives in mansions, makes big bucks from Gorebull Warming, buys
a 100-foot houseboat that docks at the Hurricane Marina in Smithville,
Tennessee, leaves his fleet of limousines running while he delivers a
speech so they will be nice and cool when he comes out, and tells us
peons that we have to cut back our lifestyles, Politician, not a
scinetist, not a climatologist.)

David Suzuki, (a Canadian left-wing "scientist" earning hundreds of
thousands promoting Gorebull Warming, who is a geneticist, and
zoologist, not a climatologist, lives a wealthy life and travels in
huge gas guzzling vehicles and tells us to cut back,) and

marcodbea....oops, sorry. I mean Ouroboros Rex, the "expert" who needs
to go back to grade four and learn some common sense, and get some
basic knowledge of the world. The study of History, and Geo-Politics
might be a good start.)

HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW

Catoni wrote:
On Jun 22, 2:13 pm, "Ouroboros Rex" wrote:
Eric Gisin wrote:
http://www.onlineopinion.com.au/view...le=9075&page=0

By Bob Carter, David Evans, Stewart Franks and Bill Kininmonth.

HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW

James Hansen, (Embarrassed his former boss,

Sorry, long ago debunked pathetic lie. lol

"Ouroboros Rex" wrote in message
...
Eric Gisin wrote:
http://www.onlineopinion.com.au/view...le=9075&page=0

By Bob Carter, David Evans, Stewart Franks and Bill Kininmonth.

HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW


Can't refute what was said?

Jerry Okamura wrote:
"Ouroboros Rex" wrote in message
...
Eric Gisin wrote:
http://www.onlineopinion.com.au/view...le=9075&page=0

By Bob Carter, David Evans, Stewart Franks and Bill Kininmonth.

HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW


Can't refute what was said?

See alt.global-warming for previous extended debunkings of each issue, and
evidence damning each denialist liar.

"Ouroboros Rex" wrote in message
...
Jerry Okamura wrote:
"Ouroboros Rex" wrote in message
...
Eric Gisin wrote:
http://www.onlineopinion.com.au/view...le=9075&page=0

By Bob Carter, David Evans, Stewart Franks and Bill Kininmonth.

HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW


Can't refute what was said?

See alt.global-warming for previous extended debunkings of each issue,
and evidence damning each denialist liar.

It is a whole lot better to directly refute what was said, then to reference
what someone else said.

Jerry Okamura wrote:
"Ouroboros Rex" wrote in message
...
Jerry Okamura wrote:
"Ouroboros Rex" wrote in message
...
Eric Gisin wrote:
http://www.onlineopinion.com.au/view...le=9075&page=0

By Bob Carter, David Evans, Stewart Franks and Bill Kininmonth.

HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW


Can't refute what was said?

See alt.global-warming for previous extended debunkings of each
issue, and evidence damning each denialist liar.

It is a whole lot better to directly refute what was said, then to
reference what someone else said.

It is a whole lot better to do some introductory reading about the issue
than to come onto a science group pretending that those of us who are
intinmately familiar with it need to respond to crackpot lie articles when
all the information has been posted repeatedly here.

Let me give you a quick example, based on the first of these "tough
questions" from the article:

"Is it the case that CO2 increased by 5 per cent since 1998 whilst global
temperature cooled over the same period?

(In fact, it did not, until 2007-08. This is one of the article's lies.)

If so, why did the temperature not increase; and how can human emissions be
to blame for dangerous levels of warming?"

Now, that was posed by four supposed climate authorities, yes?

Now, how often has the first answer been discussed in this group? 1,710
results in Google:

http://tinyurl.com/nzp2jf

How often on the web? About 320,000 times, says Google:

http://tinyurl.com/lu82y8

So, do you feel dumber not knowing the answer yourself when everyone else
who is interested does, or dumber for trusting four supposed climate experts
who are pretending they don't in order to dupe you?

Here's the answer, BTW.

http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/news/news.cfm?release=2008-231