Hi All,

I've noticed that Google grading has become quite effective in reducing real
time and storage bandwidth. In real time, grade seeking nerds are inhibited
from posting if they see that their Google scores are low. Google plans to
purge its mega terabyte stores of useless messages. Message with low scores
will be purged. Posters with low aggregate scores will be purged. My
question relates to the usenet trick of Xarchive=No. If I use Xarchive=No my
message will be purged in six days and Google will be pleased. However, I am
concerned that if my Xarchive=No messages are graded low by "the graders",
that my aggregate grading score will be graded low and that the sum total of
my contribution to humanity's wisdom will be graded low and will be purged.

Does anyone know the answer to my question, do low score Xarchive=No
messages count towards my aggregate Google score? Thanks.

See you in eternity.

Love

Mike Vandeman

"Mike Vandeman" wrote in message
...
Hi All,

I've noticed that Google grading has become quite effective in reducing
real time and storage bandwidth. In real time, grade seeking nerds are
inhibited from posting if they see that their Google scores are low.
Google plans to purge its mega terabyte stores of useless messages.
Message with low scores will be purged. Posters with low aggregate scores
will be purged. My question relates to the usenet trick of Xarchive=No. If
I use Xarchive=No my message will be purged in six days and Google will be
pleased. However, I am concerned that if my Xarchive=No messages are
graded low by "the graders", that my aggregate grading score will be
graded low and that the sum total of my contribution to humanity's wisdom
will be graded low and will be purged.

Does anyone know the answer to my question, do low score Xarchive=No
messages count towards my aggregate Google score? Thanks.

See you in eternity.

Love

Mike Vandeman


You probably have the lowest grade available

---- AHAHAHAHAHA.... ahahaha... AHAHAHAHAHAHA.... ----

"Mike Vandeman" wrote:
[snip]
Google plans to purge its mega terabyte stores of Posters
with low aggregate scores will be purged. Do low score
Xarchive=No messages count towards my aggregate
Google score? See you in eternity. Love, Mike Vandeman.

hanson wrote:
ahahahaha... Yea, yea... love you too, Mikey... ahahahaha
LONG time no talk, Van. Why did they finally let you out?
Good show, Van, & see here, as a welcome-back present
for your return to the less far side...
*** I just helped google by snipping your useless crap. ****

Now, Van, tell me whatever happened to your 2 decade long
campaign, you as an aspiring class 2 enviro, aka Green Turd,
when you tried to con free real-estate from the "goviment"?
Remember your sig, Van:
::MV:: I am working [for the last 10 years] on creating wildlife
::MV:: habitat that is off-limits to humans ("pure habitat").
::MV:: Want to help? (I spent the previous 8 years fighting
::MV:: auto dependence and road construction.)

Also, how did you learn to mountain-bike while you were in that
habitat they committed you to?... or did you just get religion?...
So, here is your real Love, your religion, the Green Bible.
It talks about the enviro classifications & it's a 5 star post, Mikey.
It will stay with/on google. Ain't that wonderful news for you?
Here it is, for your benefit:

http://groups.google.com/group/sci.p...3225ad7ed0e900

Thanks for the laughs, Mikey.... ahahahaha... ahahahahanson

hanson who? wrote:
---- AHAHAHAHAHA.... ahahaha... AHAHAHAHAHAHA.... ----

"Mike Vandeman" wrote:
[snip]
Google plans to purge its mega terabyte stores of Posters with low
aggregate scores will be purged. Do low score Xarchive=No messages
count towards my aggregate Google score? See you in eternity. Love,
Mike Vandeman.

hanson wrote:
ahahahaha... Yea, yea... love you too, Mikey... ahahahaha
LONG time no talk, Van. Why did they finally let you out?
Good show, Van, & see here, as a welcome-back present for your return to
the less far side... *** I just helped google by snipping your useless
crap. ****

Now, Van, tell me whatever happened to your 2 decade long campaign, you
as an aspiring class 2 enviro, aka Green Turd, when you tried to con
free real-estate from the "goviment"?
Remember your sig, Van:
::MV:: I am working [for the last 10 years] on creating wildlife ::MV::
habitat that is off-limits to humans ("pure habitat"). ::MV:: Want to
help? (I spent the previous 8 years fighting ::MV:: auto dependence
and road construction.)

Also, how did you learn to mountain-bike while you were in that habitat
they committed you to?... or did you just get religion?... So, here is
your real Love, your religion, the Green Bible. It talks about the
enviro classifications & it's a 5 star post, Mikey.
It will stay with/on google. Ain't that wonderful news for you?
Here it is, for your benefit:

http://groups.google.com/group/sci.p...3225ad7ed0e900

Thanks for the laughs, Mikey.... ahahahaha... ahahahahanson

You are replying to a fake Vandeman.

--
Tom Sherman - 42.435731,-83.985007
LOCAL CACTUS EATS CYCLIST - datakoll

DI Who? wrote:
"Mike Vandeman" wrote in message
...
Hi All,

I've noticed that Google grading has become quite effective in reducing
real time and storage bandwidth. In real time, grade seeking nerds are
inhibited from posting if they see that their Google scores are low.
Google plans to purge its mega terabyte stores of useless messages.
Message with low scores will be purged. Posters with low aggregate scores
will be purged. My question relates to the usenet trick of Xarchive=No. If
I use Xarchive=No my message will be purged in six days and Google will be
pleased. However, I am concerned that if my Xarchive=No messages are
graded low by "the graders", that my aggregate grading score will be
graded low and that the sum total of my contribution to humanity's wisdom
will be graded low and will be purged.

Does anyone know the answer to my question, do low score Xarchive=No
messages count towards my aggregate Google score? Thanks.

See you in eternity.

Love

Mike Vandeman


You probably have the lowest grade available


The real Mikey or the fake Mikey?

--
Tom Sherman - 42.435731,-83.985007
LOCAL CACTUS EATS CYCLIST - datakoll

On Sun, 12 Apr 2009 18:14:45 -0500, "DI" wrote:


"Mike Vandeman" wrote in message
...
Hi All,

I've noticed that Google grading has become quite effective in reducing
real time and storage bandwidth. In real time, grade seeking nerds are
inhibited from posting if they see that their Google scores are low.
Google plans to purge its mega terabyte stores of useless messages.
Message with low scores will be purged. Posters with low aggregate scores
will be purged. My question relates to the usenet trick of Xarchive=No. If
I use Xarchive=No my message will be purged in six days and Google will be
pleased. However, I am concerned that if my Xarchive=No messages are
graded low by "the graders", that my aggregate grading score will be
graded low and that the sum total of my contribution to humanity's wisdom
will be graded low and will be purged.

Does anyone know the answer to my question, do low score Xarchive=No
messages count towards my aggregate Google score? Thanks.

See you in eternity.

Love

Mike Vandeman


You probably have the lowest grade available


Whom are you talking to? Do you even know???
--
I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to
humans ("pure habitat"). Want to help? (I spent the previous 8
years fighting auto dependence and road construction.)

Please don't put a cell phone next to any part of your body that you are fond of!

http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande

On Mon, 13 Apr 2009 01:07:05 GMT, "hanson" wrote:

---- AHAHAHAHAHA.... ahahaha... AHAHAHAHAHAHA.... ----

"Mike Vandeman" wrote:
[snip]
Google plans to purge its mega terabyte stores of Posters
with low aggregate scores will be purged. Do low score
Xarchive=No messages count towards my aggregate
Google score? See you in eternity. Love, Mike Vandeman.

hanson wrote:
ahahahaha... Yea, yea... love you too, Mikey... ahahahaha
LONG time no talk, Van. Why did they finally let you out?
Good show, Van, & see here, as a welcome-back present
for your return to the less far side...
*** I just helped google by snipping your useless crap. ****

Now, Van, tell me whatever happened to your 2 decade long
campaign, you as an aspiring class 2 enviro, aka Green Turd,
when you tried to con free real-estate from the "goviment"?
Remember your sig, Van:
::MV:: I am working [for the last 10 years] on creating wildlife
::MV:: habitat that is off-limits to humans ("pure habitat").
::MV:: Want to help? (I spent the previous 8 years fighting
::MV:: auto dependence and road construction.)

Also, how did you learn to mountain-bike while you were in that
habitat they committed you to?... or did you just get religion?...
So, here is your real Love, your religion, the Green Bible.
It talks about the enviro classifications & it's a 5 star post, Mikey.
It will stay with/on google. Ain't that wonderful news for you?
Here it is, for your benefit:

http://groups.google.com/group/sci.p...3225ad7ed0e900

Thanks for the laughs, Mikey.... ahahahaha... ahahahahanson

Whom are you talking to? Do you even know???
--
I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to
humans ("pure habitat"). Want to help? (I spent the previous 8
years fighting auto dependence and road construction.)

Please don't put a cell phone next to any part of your body that you are fond of!

http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande

---- AHAHAHAHAHA.... ahahaha... AHAHAHAHAHAHA.... ----

"Mike Vandeman" wrote:
"hanson" wrote:
"Mike Vandeman" wrote:
[snip]
Google plans to purge its mega terabyte stores of Posters
with low aggregate scores will be purged. Do low score
Xarchive=No messages count towards my aggregate
Google score? See you in eternity. Love, Mike Vandeman.

hanson wrote:
ahahahaha... Yea, yea... love you too, Mikey... ahahahaha
LONG time no talk, Van. Why did they finally let you out?
Good show, Van, & see here, as a welcome-back present
for your return to the less far side...
*** I just helped google by snipping your useless crap. ****

hanson continued and wrote:
Now, Van, tell me whatever happened to your 2 decade long
campaign, you as an aspiring class 2 enviro, aka Green Turd,
when you tried to con free real-estate from the "goviment"?
Remember your sig, Van:

::MV:: I am working [for the last 10 years] on creating wildlife
::MV:: habitat that is off-limits to humans ("pure habitat").
::MV:: Want to help? (I spent the previous 8 years fighting
::MV:: auto dependence and road construction.)

Also, how did you learn to mountain-bike while you were in that
habitat they committed you to?... or did you just get religion?...
So, here is your real Love, your religion, the Green Bible.
It talks about the enviro classifications & it's a 5 star post, Mikey.
It will stay with/on google. Ain't that wonderful news for you?
Here it is, for your benefit:

http://groups.google.com/group/sci.p...3225ad7ed0e900

Thanks for the laughs, Mikey.... ahahahaha... ahahahahanson

Mike Vandeman wrote:
Whom are you talking to? Do you even know???
--
I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to
humans ("pure habitat"). Want to help? (I spent the previous 8
years fighting auto dependence and road construction.)

Please don't put a cell phone next to any part of your body that you
are fond of!

http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande

hanson wrote:
AHAHAHAHA...Awe, Mikey, you poor sod, did they give you
daily electro-shock treatments or even a frontal lobotomy
during your commitment in that "habitat" that you can't even
remember who you were and are?... Sorry. But it's funny!
Thanks for the laughs, Mikey.... ahahahaha... ahahahahanson

---- AHAHAHAHAHA.... ahahaha... AHAHAHAHAHAHA.... ----

"Tom Sherman"
hanson who? wrote:
"Mike Vandeman" wrote:
[snip]
Google plans to purge its mega terabyte stores of Posters with low
aggregate scores will be purged. Do low score Xarchive=No messages
count towards my aggregate Google score? See you in eternity. Love,
Mike Vandeman.

hanson wrote:
ahahahaha... Yea, yea... love you too, Mikey... ahahahaha
LONG time no talk, Van. Why did they finally let you out?
Good show, Van, & see here, as a welcome-back present for your return to
the less far side... *** I just helped google by snipping your useless
crap. ****

Now, Van, tell me whatever happened to your 2 decade long campaign,
you as an aspiring class 2 enviro, aka Green Turd, when you tried to
con free real-estate from the "goviment"?
Remember your sig, Van:
::MV:: I am working [for the last 10 years] on creating wildlife
::MV:: habitat that is off-limits to humans ("pure habitat").
::MV:: Want to help? (I spent the previous 8 years fighting
::MV:: auto dependence and road construction.)

Also, how did you learn to mountain-bike while you were in that habitat
they committed you to?... or did you just get religion?... So, here is
your real Love, your religion, the Green Bible. It talks about the enviro
classifications & it's a 5 star post, Mikey.
It will stay with/on google. Ain't that wonderful news for you?
Here it is, for your benefit:

http://groups.google.com/group/sci.p...3225ad7ed0e900

Thanks for the laughs, Mikey.... ahahahaha... ahahahahanson

Tom Sherman wrote:
You are replying to a fake Vandeman.
--
Tom Sherman - 42.435731,-83.985007
LOCAL CACTUS EATS CYCLIST - datakoll

hanson wrote:
Tom, your quick cover and defense for Mike indicate that
you may be his MB-trainer or his rehab nurse...????...
Are your fearing loss of incoming if Mikey turns out to be
capable of railing again against the mountain bikers ?...
ahaha... Be careful what you wish for, Tom.... ahahaha...
But thanks for the laughs... ahahahaha... ahahahanson

hanson who? wrote:
---- AHAHAHAHAHA.... ahahaha... AHAHAHAHAHAHA.... ----

"Tom Sherman"
hanson who? wrote:
"Mike Vandeman" wrote:
[snip]
Google plans to purge its mega terabyte stores of Posters with low
aggregate scores will be purged. Do low score Xarchive=No messages
count towards my aggregate Google score? See you in eternity. Love,
Mike Vandeman.

hanson wrote:
ahahahaha... Yea, yea... love you too, Mikey... ahahahaha
LONG time no talk, Van. Why did they finally let you out?
Good show, Van, & see here, as a welcome-back present for your return to
the less far side... *** I just helped google by snipping your useless
crap. ****

Now, Van, tell me whatever happened to your 2 decade long campaign,
you as an aspiring class 2 enviro, aka Green Turd, when you tried to
con free real-estate from the "goviment"?
Remember your sig, Van:
::MV:: I am working [for the last 10 years] on creating wildlife
::MV:: habitat that is off-limits to humans ("pure habitat").
::MV:: Want to help? (I spent the previous 8 years fighting
::MV:: auto dependence and road construction.)

Also, how did you learn to mountain-bike while you were in that habitat
they committed you to?... or did you just get religion?... So, here is
your real Love, your religion, the Green Bible. It talks about the
enviro
classifications & it's a 5 star post, Mikey.
It will stay with/on google. Ain't that wonderful news for you?
Here it is, for your benefit:

http://groups.google.com/group/sci.p...3225ad7ed0e900

Thanks for the laughs, Mikey.... ahahahaha... ahahahahanson

Tom Sherman wrote:
You are replying to a fake Vandeman.
Please honor the signature separator (i.e. "-- ").

hanson wrote:
Tom, your quick cover and defense for Mike indicate that
you may be his MB-trainer or his rehab nurse...????...
Are your fearing loss of incoming if Mikey turns out to be
capable of railing again against the mountain bikers ?...
ahaha... Be careful what you wish for, Tom.... ahahaha...
But thanks for the laughs... ahahahaha... ahahahanson

If you had been around AMB or RBS, you would know I have no use for
Mikey V the lumberjack, mountain biker and air traveler.

--
Tom Sherman - 42.435731,-83.985007
LOCAL CACTUS EATS CYCLIST - datakoll