0ZBN0 wrote:

"InBusinessforGood.blogspot.com" wrote

Do You Want to be part of growing social network that makes your
computer more green.

NO!

No ?

Just reject that Vista POS, and insist that Microsoft continues to supply
and support XP and you don't need a monster energy gobbling CPU !

Also campaign for more low power CPUs and chipsets. Really simple.

Graham

On Sun, 08 Jun 2008 04:00:16 +0100, Eeyore
wrote:



0ZBN0 wrote:

"InBusinessforGood.blogspot.com" wrote

Do You Want to be part of growing social network that makes your
computer more green.

NO!

No ?

Just reject that Vista POS, and insist that Microsoft continues to supply
and support XP and you don't need a monster energy gobbling CPU !

Also campaign for more low power CPUs and chipsets. Really simple.

Graham


Pretty irrelevant anyway considering that China currently spews 3
billion tonnes of CO2 into the atmosphere every year,and that figure
is set to rise to 7 billion tonnes over the next 10 years.
Dont think my little computer running or not running is going to make
much differance.

Heres an interesting figure for you.
A 1 KW solar panel system will mitigate on average around 2.5 tonnes
of CO2 per year.
We would only need around 1.2 billion installations to mitigate just
Chinas current CO2 emmissions.
Doesnt count countries like India, Pakistan, Russia or Indonesia.
Only 6.8 billion ppl in the world and 2/3 of them are so poor they
wont be installing solar systems anytime soon.

AGW if it exists needs a GLOBAL solution.
Hardly rocket science.

"Mauried" wrote
Pretty irrelevant anyway considering that China currently spews 3
billion tonnes of CO2 into the atmosphere every year,and that figure
is set to rise to 7 billion tonnes over the next 10 years.

Wich is still less than the 9 billion tonnes of CO2 that the U.S. spews
into the air every year.

And of course, China has more than 3 times the U.S. population.

China has the right to put as much CO2 into the atmosphere (per capita) as
any other nation of course.

So the U.S. as leader in the emissions area, will have to cut back.. By
about 90%.

Ahahahahahahahah

"Eeyore" wrote
Just reject that Vista POS, and insist that Microsoft continues to supply
and support XP and you don't need a monster energy gobbling CPU !

Also campaign for more low power CPUs and chipsets. Really simple.

The EEPC from China, and a host of other extremely lowe power machines
from the Pacific rim (running the Intel atom - 2 watts max) - are about to
hit the street.

Looks like backlighting for the LCD display is now the primary consumer of
energy.

Runtime 4-6 hours on 3 AA batteries.