"N:dlzc D:aol T:com (dlzc)" wrote:

Dear Archimedes Plutonium:

"Archimedes Plutonium" wrote in message
...
...
Then the other solution in tandem is the addition
of vast amounts of ozone into the upper atmosphere.
The ozone absorbs UV energy and re-emits into
outer space so that the energy does not hit ground
and heat up Earth.

No. Ozone absorbs UV and dissociates in oxygen and monatomic
oxygen.


Yes, thanks for the correction, for I was tongue-tied, mind-tied, plus
typing-tied. I simply wanted to say that the Ice Dust reflects and the
Ozone absorbs sunlight to cool Earth. Yes the Ozone cycle in the
stratosphere for the temperature rise called the StratoPause. The ozone
is crucial to this temperature layer at 50 km otherwise the heat would
reach Earth.

David, can you tell us how much of the Global Warming at present is due
to the destruction of the Ozone layer to date. A rough percentage??

It is the fact of 2 methods, one of reflection and one of absorption
that is paramount to making a Air Conditioner. I would like both methods
employed simultaneously.

So I want an ozone enrichment and I want a Ice Dust shield reflector.


...
But can we produce ozone on the ground and
package it and then cargo haul it to the space
station to distribute?

No. It is explosive (self-decomposes), and your "cargo hauler"
will either consume the oxygen necessary for Earth to make her
own, or seed the atmosphere with moisture which will in itself
drastically curtail Earth's ability to make ozone. One pathway
to the production of ozone is temporary acceptance of a monatomic
oxygen onto a nitrogen gas molecule, which with the presence of
visible light. Water makes this N2O* into a stable compound.
Additionally, ozone, even at liquid ozone temperatures, has a
half-life of about a week.

Yes, I think a nitrogen-oxygen compound is the better bet to cargo haul
to begin to build back up the depleted ozone. And then to make more
ozone then ever before to counterbalance rising GlobalWarming.



I am thinking that the cost of this tandem
solution is not very costly at all. We certainly
can manufacture Ice Dust and ozone on the
surface and cargo haul them to the Space
Station. And I suppose the ozone can be liquidized.

And we could rename "astronauts" to Ice Dust(R) fairies!

Not sure if those particles will interfer in a big
way with the stations kinetics as it collides with ice
dust particles.

Yes it would. You can't just "release them", since they stay in
orbit with the ISS. You have to alter their momentum, to let
them fall into a "lower orbit". Now you need some sort of
thruster.


Well we have to determine where to release the Ice-Dust. Once we do that
we can then engineer a robot similar to the Mars robot of 2004 that was
so successful to deliver the Ice-Dust in a prescribed orbit around Earth
using the Space Station as a home base for the robots.



But I like this idea because we have control
over how much dust is released and we can control
over what spots on the surface need more or less
Ice Dust covering. We maybe able to control the
weather via the Space Station.

It is unimportant "what you like". We purportedly had a "global
warming episode" on the days after 9/11, when jet contrails were
not present to reflect the Sun's light back into space. We don't
need to go into space with this. If "global warming" is a
problem, we already have the means to reverse it.

But I still think we should replenish ozone

We shouldn't. Nature can do it herself, if we will leave her to
it.

David A. Smith

You are off-base and out of tune with reality. Earth as a planet can no
longer sustain itself as self-fixing and with rising human
overpopulations.

You deny the question that humanity can change Earth for the worse,
faster than Earth can respond to the change.

Humanity is the chief cause of Global Warming and it is we who must
solve and fix it.

Trouble with David is that he likes to counter every thing I say, even
if the countering makes him look stupid and illogical. And even if the
countering discredits him as being or acting like a scientist. David has
to learn to post on the Internet in such a manner that only the science
is discussed and not his hatred of me and my ideas.

Archimedes Plutonium
www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom where dots
of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies