On 17/02/2016 08:16, dawlish wrote:
Absolutely correct. It's a 'may'.

There is no evidence that this will occur and deniers have simply
been wrong about the expectations that the recent GW has in some way
been due to solar cycles. Idiots grasp at straws. Scientist
understand likelihoods.

Interestingly that well known sceptic site The Register has even
conceded on this one that the denier claims on sunspot cycles is bogus
and an artefact of improvements in counting methods from 1947 onwards.

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2015/08...limate_change/

The original IAU press release on the systematic errors that were found
when combining Wolf's historical method of counting with the modern way.

http://www.iau.org/news/pressreleases/detail/iau1508/

Another straw that AGW deniers like to clutch at has been removed.

--
Regards,
Martin Brown