On Saturday, 18 April 2015 11:53:10 UTC+1, Dennis wrote:
On Sat, 18 Apr 2015 03:14:20 -0700, Lawrence Jenkins wrote:

On Saturday, 18 April 2015 07:31:45 UTC+1, Malcolm Ogilvie wrote:

What part of that short, factual statement makes the writer "sound very
pleased"?

Because he scrabbles for every piece of apparent bad climate news but
denies or ignores the contrary.

Oh, the irony.

Not really as its an uneven contest. The USA media which has been entirely Leonardo Decaprionised so 90% is fluffy news items of young, almost pre pubescent girls, taking selfies of their arses in provocative positions. Why even the non left the middle class tabloids like the Mail do it all the time.

So against that background so called scientists with an agenda can proclaim any tosh they want there is only a handful of people who speak up against the spin.


We always hear that record cold, record heat, severe droughts, severe floods, melt sea is, expanding sea ice and so on are manifestations of *MAN* made global warming. The penny is dropping big time, that the temperature data which is in the hands of people like Gavin Schmidt who refused to debate the issue or be in the same studio as Dr Roy Spencer; is being heavily stretched and spun as temperatures despite the increase in C02 has failed to rise.

So the tripe that Dawlish just itches to present is hold hat and has a massive cloud shaped like a question mark hanging over it. Its hardly brave contradiction of the 'consensus', is it.