On Tuesday, February 18, 2014 9:21:39 AM UTC, David Mitchell wrote:
On Tuesday, 18 February 2014 07:55:42 UTC, Dawlish wrote:

Surely. When we have a mobile situation, it is impossible at 10 days to say exactly where, in the passage of depressions we will be; hence the possibilities.



That's what forecasting is.

Forecasting has not reached that pinnacle. I'm afraid. No-one can do that and I'm not claiming I can.

The overall thrust is that we will be in an Atlantic flow. Hope that educates you a little more as to my method, but if you'd actually read what I've written instead of being Mr. Angry from Purley about it all, you'd already know.

Believe it or not, I understand that. No Mr Angry, a genuine question, which once again you failed to answer. What period does this forecast cover, it is misleading?

A little attempt at understanding would go a long way.

Would you like to proffer an alternative and perhaps more detailed forecast? You appear to have missed commenting on my previous 3/4 correct forecasts David: shame but there you go. You also missed my proffered opportunity to forecast yourself. Too easy, I suppose. *)).

I only comment if there is something to comment about. Your methods haven't changed, so what's new? I haven't said your forecasts are wrong, what I've said is that essentially you re-issue other forecasts and claim a percentage that is entirely misleading also.

I like the fact that every time I forecast, There is something for you to talk about. What you've said is not what happens and you've been told that, not just by me, but by others. Your problem is that you set out not to understand and bongo! You don't.

I don't have time to study the models, but no, it isn't that hard and what would anyone gain from it? What does anyone actually gain from your one-liners?

You don't have time to do it, yet you know that an 80%+ success rate isn't hard. See your problem?

If I did ever issue forecasts, I would attempt (and fail) to issue something of interest and benefit and with a little detail.

Would you? That's nice.

Well done not missing an opportunity to defend your man. As I said, praiseworthy that, if a little obsequious.

No defence there at all and he isn't my man, another sad comment from you entirely related to your obsession.

Ah! I see. *))

Still waiting for you to answer any of my questions. You avoid them all the time and attempt to use diversionary techniques and misplaced insults. Give up now, doesn't work, never will.

you are now copying from my posts to others. Please state your questions and I will be happy to oblige. I thought I'd answered everything you'd asked, but perhaps Mr Angry of Purley missed the replies in looking for something to fume about. *))