On Tuesday, 18 February 2014 07:55:42 UTC, Dawlish wrote:
Surely. When we have a mobile situation, it is impossible at 10 days to say exactly where, in the passage of depressions we will be; hence the possibilities.

That's what forecasting is.

The overall thrust is that we will be in an Atlantic flow. Hope that educates you a little more as to my method, but if you'd actually read what I've written instead of being Mr. Angry from Purley about it all, you'd already know.

Believe it or not, I understand that. No Mr Angry, a genuine question, which once again you failed to answer. What period does this forecast cover, it is misleading?

Would you like to proffer an alternative and perhaps more detailed forecast? You appear to have missed commenting on my previous 3/4 correct forecasts David: shame but there you go. You also missed my proffered opportunity to forecast yourself. Too easy, I suppose. *)).

I only comment if there is something to comment about. Your methods haven't changed, so what's new? I haven't said your forecasts are wrong, what I've said is that essentially you re-issue other forecasts and claim a percentage that is entirely misleading also.

I don't have time to study the models, but no, it isn't that hard and what would anyone gain from it? What does anyone actually gain from your one-liners?

If I did ever issue forecasts, I would attempt (and fail) to issue something of interest and benefit and with a little detail.

Well done not missing an opportunity to defend your man. As I said, praiseworthy that, if a little obsequious.

No defence there at all and he isn't my man, another sad comment from you entirely related to your obsession.

Still waiting for you to answer any of my questions. You avoid them all the time and attempt to use diversionary techniques and misplaced insults. Give up now, doesn't work, never will.