On Feb 7, 3:11*pm, Weatherlawyer wrote:
On Feb 6, 4:38*pm, Weatherlawyer wrote:



Evidently the absence of tropical storms indicates an increase
in medium sized quakes.

A very deep Low on the N American east coast looks like
displacing the Greenland High.
When it does, the not so deep Low in the Alaskan Gulf will deepen. All
the while they are separated by a flaccid High.

Wednesday looks interesting with a series of quakes kicking off the
next tropical storm. (That will be posted on Midnight Thursday at the
latest I imagine.)

8.0 * 2013/02/06 01:12:27 * -10.738 * *165.138 *28.7 * SANTA CRUZ
ISLANDS

Going bt the precipitation on the BOM chart and a new idea about the
interaction of weather an seimicity, late Saturday should be revealing
-assuming that activity at Santa Cruz Islands has diminished.

(OTOH if seismic activity has not decreased significantly, things
should be even more revealing.)

Three Lows on hehttp://www.weatheroffice.gc.ca/ensem.../cartes_e.html

(Just!)
Not deep ones this time. But Santa Cruz is in the Fijian Triangle. So
almost anything can happen with such a sequence.

Multiple parallel fronts on the North Atlantic Charts virtually
continuously from this afternoon at the time of writin (7 February
2013.) These end with a thundering bump on T+60 and by T+72 becom twin
divergent Lows off Greenland once mre leading to a mid Atlntic High.

(So more cold easterlies, RonB please note. Tie your granny to her
mattress this time. Ignore the smell of vitamin B and Vicks. You'll
feel a lot better about it.)

This is a bad spell that will end on the 10th. A new spell similar to
this one but with a tropical storm in the southern Indian Ocean -about
90 degrees east, will occur by Monday.

This should ease things a little.
There is still a lot of potential for convergence here until the 11th:

http://www.weatheroffice.gc.ca/ensem.../cartes_e.html

Be careful.