On 15 May, 17:02, Alan LeHun wrote:
In article 4ffedc91-1898-488f-90bd-
,
says...

48 hours?

You're talking about feeding times in a subterranean zoo and you think
48 hours tells you something?

Of course. *It's not the magnitudes that are important, or even the
frequency, it is sudden changes in activity that tell us something.

There is no lag between deep magma movements and the tremors they cause.

First off, there is no way to tell if what the machinery is looking at
IS magma.

These earthquakes are *not* due to build up of shear forces.

No earthquakes are due to a build up of shear forces. At deep levels
and high temperatures rock is soft an pliable. It is all fluid.

Then there is the matter of distinguishing sand from aquifer.

But don't let honest enquiry interfere with your take on a thread
about facts....

....Oops!
Wrong thread.

A sudden change in seismic activity will almost always relate
to a sudden change in deep magma behavior.

A sudden change in seismic behaviour will appear to affect everything -
including seismic behaviour.

But let me put it in simpler terms for your edification:

There is a root cause to all of this and it all passes through a stage
of physics called acoustics.

The initiating factor is gravitational attraction. (But until you can
get your head around the way that that works -or rather DOES NOT WORK,
you are going to remain a lost sheep.)

I suppose you have the bloody cheek to ignore most of the stuff I've
been trying to tell you for umpteen years, have you?

Well as I said earlier, I'm afraid so. Trying to work out exactly what
it is you're trying to say is simply too much work.

Have you tried asking me nicely?

I don't respond at all well to people who need my help being cheeky to
me.