On Apr 12, 3:48*am, Weatherlawyer wrote:
You just don't learn, do you?

I don't read your posts. I haven't read your posts for a long time and
I steer clear of any threads you start or take a major part in.

You are no more to me that the mad Frog. It is possible to feel sorry
for you but I am not nice enough to. You are a tosser as far as I am
concerned.

Kindly go away.

Mad frog......tosser......Ah, the insults are never far away. I know
you are not nice, W. I know you are insulting, foul and nasty when
provoked. Water and duck's back for me, as you also know.

I'm just one that actually took the trouble to assess some of your
predictions W and they were found dreadfully wanting. I hate
pseudoscience and you don't like criticism. Likewise, I don't bother
actually reading your ramblings, but I do scan a sample for
predictions. You use hopelessly limited and flawed data, not
understanding that there are thousands of small earthquakes every day,
which are not shown in the USGS lists. You then cherry pick the lists,
in hindsight most of the time, as an attempt at backing your theories.
I have noticed that since I monitored your success, you now shy away
from making outright predictions but, as with all charlatans, it's
important to remind people just how far into left field you are with
your gravity/earthquakes/weather theories. It really boils down to one
thing - and I will ignore any insults you reply with and leave you
alone again after I've said it.

No percentage outcome success: no use.