On Sun, 12 Apr 2009 14:38:01 +0100, Cwatters wrote:

"Marvin the Martian" wrote in message
...
Unlike the CO2 theory and the red herring irradiance argument,
Svensmark
theory SHOULD work, and it shows good agreement with 4.5 billion years
of climate data. The Anthropogenic Global warming people don't even
have a hypothesis anymo all their much vaunted "computer models"
that were fabricated by simple curve fitting failed to predict the last
decade of non-warming.

I guess you haven't heard they attribute that to La Nina...

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/7786060.stm

And what causes "La Nina"? Your argument is circular. I point out that we
are at a solar minimum and thus, by Svensmark's theory, the climate
should be colder.

The first guy denies that it was colder.

You admit it's colder but attribute the colder climate to the ... climate.

You guys are not logical. No wonder you believe this stuff.



--
http://OnToMars.org For discussions about Mars and Mars colonization