Thread: GFS runs?
View Single Post
  #2   Report Post  
Old January 23rd 04, 10:32 AM posted to uk.sci.weather
martin rowley martin rowley is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Jul 2003
Posts: 506
Default GFS runs?


"Keith (Southend)" wrote in message
...
Out of interest what times do the GFS model update on the internet?
And secondly, there appears to be a varying time between the GFS T+0
to T+8 days and T+9 to T+16 days. I say this as the first lot have
recently changed this morning, whereas the second lot haven't, and
they are showing a very mild longer term ~ hence I'm hoping they will
change :-)


Andrew Bond posted in another thread the reason (I think) that there
appears to be a mis-match. Up to T+180, the GFS is run on a finer
resolution (both spatial and temporal); then beyond that, the res. is
course and with lengthier time-steps. I imagine that the post-processing
involved means that effectively you've got two products output, rather
than a seamless stream. I find that they are usually fully updated by
T+5hr, sometimes T+4.5hr.

Some information he but some of it I know is out of date...

http://homepage.ntlworld.com/booty.w...put.htm#Output

Martin.

--
FAQ & Glossary for uk.sci.weather at:-
http://homepage.ntlworld.com/booty.weather/uswfaqfr.htm