[GW] Interesting (GWUK).
 

Global warming will affect some parts of the earth differently to others, hence my term GWUK to describe what is/may happening to the UK. This is an interesting report from the Met Office and worth a read. Whether that will continue in the UK is another matter. Recent research (Scaife et al) points to perhaps colder winters as at the Arctic loses ice. Overall, however, the world will continue to warm and we are, doubtless now, the major cause.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-46064266

In addition, this very recent study (I know, paywalled) suggests strongly that Earth's climate sensitivity may well be at the high end of estimates - the oceans seem to have been absorbing more anthropogenic CO2 than was thought. That would be worrying in keeping CO2 emissions within guidelines.

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-018-0651-8

For the sceptics/deniers here's a different view from Roy Spencer:

http://www.drroyspencer.com/global-w...al-or-manmade/ Be again, 'interesting' to see his take on the 'Nature' article on ocean absorption and climate sensitivity. I doubt he'll agree. *))

[GW] Interesting (GWUK).
 

On Friday, 2 November 2018 08:04:24 UTC, wrote:
Global warming will affect some parts of the earth differently to others, hence my term GWUK to describe what is/may happening to the UK. This is an interesting report from the Met Office and worth a read. Whether that will continue in the UK is another matter. Recent research (Scaife et al) points to perhaps colder winters as at the Arctic loses ice. Overall, however, the world will continue to warm and we are, doubtless now, the major cause.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-46064266

In addition, this very recent study (I know, paywalled) suggests strongly that Earth's climate sensitivity may well be at the high end of estimates - the oceans seem to have been absorbing more anthropogenic CO2 than was thought. That would be worrying in keeping CO2 emissions within guidelines.

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-018-0651-8

For the sceptics/deniers here's a different view from Roy Spencer:

http://www.drroyspencer.com/global-w...al-or-manmade/ Be again, 'interesting' to see his take on the 'Nature' article on ocean absorption and climate sensitivity. I doubt he'll agree. *))

How long can a cyclone remain an equinoctial before you get a chance to pull your head out of you brains?
https://earth.nullschool.net/#curren.....50,52.98,289

[GW] Interesting (GWUK).
 

On Saturday, 3 November 2018 02:08:46 UTC, Weatherlawyer wrote:
On Friday, 2 November 2018 08:04:24 UTC, wrote:
Global warming will affect some parts of the earth differently to others, hence my term GWUK to describe what is/may happening to the UK. This is an interesting report from the Met Office and worth a read. Whether that will continue in the UK is another matter. Recent research (Scaife et al) points to perhaps colder winters as at the Arctic loses ice. Overall, however, the world will continue to warm and we are, doubtless now, the major cause..

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-46064266

In addition, this very recent study (I know, paywalled) suggests strongly that Earth's climate sensitivity may well be at the high end of estimates - the oceans seem to have been absorbing more anthropogenic CO2 than was thought. That would be worrying in keeping CO2 emissions within guidelines.

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-018-0651-8

For the sceptics/deniers here's a different view from Roy Spencer:

http://www.drroyspencer.com/global-w...al-or-manmade/ Be again, 'interesting' to see his take on the 'Nature' article on ocean absorption and climate sensitivity. I doubt he'll agree. *))

How long can a cyclone remain an equinoctial before you get a chance to pull your head out of you brains?
https://earth.nullschool.net/#curren...6.50,52.98,289

Not a lot of people know that.
There's no answer to that.

[GW] Interesting (GWUK).
 

On Friday, 2 November 2018 08:04:24 UTC, wrote:
Global warming will affect some parts of the earth differently to others, hence my term GWUK to describe what is/may happening to the UK. This is an interesting report from the Met Office and worth a read. Whether that will continue in the UK is another matter. Recent research (Scaife et al) points to perhaps colder winters as at the Arctic loses ice. Overall, however, the world will continue to warm and we are, doubtless now, the major cause.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-46064266

In addition, this very recent study (I know, paywalled) suggests strongly that Earth's climate sensitivity may well be at the high end of estimates - the oceans seem to have been absorbing more anthropogenic CO2 than was thought. That would be worrying in keeping CO2 emissions within guidelines.

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-018-0651-8

For the sceptics/deniers here's a different view from Roy Spencer:

http://www.drroyspencer.com/global-w...al-or-manmade/ Be again, 'interesting' to see his take on the 'Nature' article on ocean absorption and climate sensitivity. I doubt he'll agree. *))

So for the last 20 years you've been dead wrong and I've been right....idiot.

[GW] Interesting (GWUK).
 

On Monday, 5 November 2018 14:00:27 UTC, Lawrence Jenkins wrote:
On Friday, 2 November 2018 08:04:24 UTC, wrote:
Global warming will affect some parts of the earth differently to others, hence my term GWUK to describe what is/may happening to the UK. This is an interesting report from the Met Office and worth a read. Whether that will continue in the UK is another matter. Recent research (Scaife et al) points to perhaps colder winters as at the Arctic loses ice. Overall, however, the world will continue to warm and we are, doubtless now, the major cause..

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-46064266

In addition, this very recent study (I know, paywalled) suggests strongly that Earth's climate sensitivity may well be at the high end of estimates - the oceans seem to have been absorbing more anthropogenic CO2 than was thought. That would be worrying in keeping CO2 emissions within guidelines.

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-018-0651-8

For the sceptics/deniers here's a different view from Roy Spencer:

http://www.drroyspencer.com/global-w...al-or-manmade/ Be again, 'interesting' to see his take on the 'Nature' article on ocean absorption and climate sensitivity. I doubt he'll agree. *))

So for the last 20 years you've been dead wrong and I've been right....idiot.

It is very wrong to call him an idiot. It requires skill and ingenuity to do what he does so industriously. I can't even see my backside. But he manages adroitly and afterwards can still post about it.

Meanwhile for those who see thing from a different perspective, this is the most likely explanation for the Standing Wave off Greenland for the last week or whatever:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4h1Zwv4cis8
I came to exactly the same conclusion on seeing it mirrored at the dame time in the East Pacific. If you go back a few posts on my blog you can find ir.