Beating the previous record by a whopping 0.2C when we are just about to enter La Nina conditions and probably a La Nina. Unprecedented:

http://www.drroyspencer.com

Spencer really struggling to explain this warmth - and of course, he won't put it down to AGW.

(Typos in my first attempt, sorry.)

(Typos in my first attempt, sorry.)

And too late anyway - try reading existing posts?

On Sunday, 5 November 2017 17:44:27 UTC, JohnD wrote:
(Typos in my first attempt, sorry.)

And too late anyway - try reading existing posts?

Too late? I hoped the group would enjoy both the link and commentary. It's never 'too late', John.

On Monday, November 6, 2017 at 12:27:26 PM UTC, wrote:
On Sunday, 5 November 2017 17:44:27 UTC, JohnD wrote:
(Typos in my first attempt, sorry.)

And too late anyway - try reading existing posts?

Too late? I hoped the group would enjoy both the link and commentary. It's never 'too late', John.

Commentary?
In which case you should have attached it to John's thread on the subject started 3rd Nov.

We all make mistakes though.

Len
Wembury

On Monday, 6 November 2017 14:26:35 UTC, Len Wood wrote:
On Monday, November 6, 2017 at 12:27:26 PM UTC, wrote:
On Sunday, 5 November 2017 17:44:27 UTC, JohnD wrote:
(Typos in my first attempt, sorry.)

And too late anyway - try reading existing posts?

Too late? I hoped the group would enjoy both the link and commentary. It's never 'too late', John.

Commentary?
In which case you should have attached it to John's thread on the subject started 3rd Nov.

We all make mistakes though.

Len
Wembury

Of course we do; I didn't see John's thread and I always comment on Global monthly temperatures. I actually cried the thread across from Bruce's site. I don't view it as a competition; I'm just interested and share.

In saying 'you should', however, you aren't correct, Len. There is no protocol. If you don't mind, I'll continue to post monthly updates from the main series and if I duplicate once in a year, I'll apologise in advance. If people find it interesting; great. If they don't; great. In the same way others post their weather stats.

On Monday, November 6, 2017 at 4:51:45 PM UTC, wrote:
On Monday, 6 November 2017 14:26:35 UTC, Len Wood wrote:
On Monday, November 6, 2017 at 12:27:26 PM UTC, wrote:
On Sunday, 5 November 2017 17:44:27 UTC, JohnD wrote:
(Typos in my first attempt, sorry.)

And too late anyway - try reading existing posts?

Too late? I hoped the group would enjoy both the link and commentary. It's never 'too late', John.

Commentary?
In which case you should have attached it to John's thread on the subject started 3rd Nov.

We all make mistakes though.

Len
Wembury

Of course we do; I didn't see John's thread and I always comment on Global monthly temperatures. I actually cried the thread across from Bruce's site. I don't view it as a competition; I'm just interested and share.

In saying 'you should', however, you aren't correct, Len. There is no protocol. If you don't mind, I'll continue to post monthly updates from the main series and if I duplicate once in a year, I'll apologise in advance. If people find it interesting; great. If they don't; great. In the same way others post their weather stats.

You cried?
O don't.
What you did was not that bad.

On Mon, 6 Nov 2017 08:59:39 -0800 (PST)
Len Wood wrote:

On Monday, November 6, 2017 at 4:51:45 PM UTC, wrote:
On Monday, 6 November 2017 14:26:35 UTC, Len Wood wrote:
On Monday, November 6, 2017 at 12:27:26 PM UTC,
wrote:
On Sunday, 5 November 2017 17:44:27 UTC, JohnD wrote:
(Typos in my first attempt, sorry.)

And too late anyway - try reading existing posts?

Too late? I hoped the group would enjoy both the link and commentary.
It's never 'too late', John.

Commentary?
In which case you should have attached it to John's thread on the subject
started 3rd Nov.

We all make mistakes though.

Len
Wembury

Of course we do; I didn't see John's thread and I always comment on Global
monthly temperatures. I actually cried the thread across from Bruce's site.
I don't view it as a competition; I'm just interested and share.

In saying 'you should', however, you aren't correct, Len. There is no
protocol. If you don't mind, I'll continue to post monthly updates from the
main series and if I duplicate once in a year, I'll apologise in advance.
If people find it interesting; great. If they don't; great. In the same way
others post their weather stats.

You cried?
O don't.
What you did was not that bad.



No need to tease Paul Len!


---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
http://www.avg.com

On Monday, November 6, 2017 at 5:01:53 PM UTC, wrote:
On Mon, 6 Nov 2017 08:59:39 -0800 (PST)
Len Wood wrote:

On Monday, November 6, 2017 at 4:51:45 PM UTC, wrote:
On Monday, 6 November 2017 14:26:35 UTC, Len Wood wrote:
On Monday, November 6, 2017 at 12:27:26 PM UTC,
On Sunday, 5 November 2017 17:44:27 UTC, JohnD wrote:
(Typos in my first attempt, sorry.)

And too late anyway - try reading existing posts?

Too late? I hoped the group would enjoy both the link and commentary.
It's never 'too late', John.

Commentary?
In which case you should have attached it to John's thread on the subject
started 3rd Nov.

We all make mistakes though.

Len
Wembury

Of course we do; I didn't see John's thread and I always comment on Global
monthly temperatures. I actually cried the thread across from Bruce's site.
I don't view it as a competition; I'm just interested and share.

In saying 'you should', however, you aren't correct, Len. There is no
protocol. If you don't mind, I'll continue to post monthly updates from the
main series and if I duplicate once in a year, I'll apologise in advance.
If people find it interesting; great. If they don't; great. In the same way
others post their weather stats.

You cried?
O don't.
What you did was not that bad.



No need to tease Paul Len!


---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
http://www.avg.com

Yes, sorry.
I don't mean to be a wind up merchant.

;-)

Len

On Monday, 6 November 2017 16:59:40 UTC, Len Wood wrote:
On Monday, November 6, 2017 at 4:51:45 PM UTC, wrote:
On Monday, 6 November 2017 14:26:35 UTC, Len Wood wrote:
On Monday, November 6, 2017 at 12:27:26 PM UTC, wrote:
On Sunday, 5 November 2017 17:44:27 UTC, JohnD wrote:
(Typos in my first attempt, sorry.)

And too late anyway - try reading existing posts?

Too late? I hoped the group would enjoy both the link and commentary. It's never 'too late', John.

Commentary?
In which case you should have attached it to John's thread on the subject started 3rd Nov.

We all make mistakes though.

Len
Wembury

Of course we do; I didn't see John's thread and I always comment on Global monthly temperatures. I actually cried the thread across from Bruce's site. I don't view it as a competition; I'm just interested and share.

In saying 'you should', however, you aren't correct, Len. There is no protocol. If you don't mind, I'll continue to post monthly updates from the main series and if I duplicate once in a year, I'll apologise in advance. If people find it interesting; great. If they don't; great. In the same way others post their weather stats.

You cried?
O don't.
What you did was not that bad.

Did you join the thread simply to abuse? No rise here. I'll continue to post monthly updates of global temperatures - and make typos.

On 06/11/2017 16:51, wrote:
On Monday, 6 November 2017 14:26:35 UTC, Len Wood wrote:
On Monday, November 6, 2017 at 12:27:26 PM UTC,
wrote:
On Sunday, 5 November 2017 17:44:27 UTC, JohnD wrote:
(Typos in my first attempt, sorry.)

And too late anyway - try reading existing posts?

Too late? I hoped the group would enjoy both the link and
commentary. It's never 'too late', John.

Commentary? In which case you should have attached it to John's
thread on the subject started 3rd Nov.

We all make mistakes though.

Len Wembury

Of course we do; I didn't see John's thread and I always comment on
Global monthly temperatures. I actually cried
the thread across from
Bruce's site.

This is why I never use predictive text.


--

Paul Hyett, Cheltenham