![]() |
Your invitation to join...
On Sun, 3 Jul 2016 17:14:49 +0100, "JohnD"
wrote: "Metman2012" wrote in message ... On 03/07/2016 10:52, Alan White wrote: Do I need to create a Google account to join? Is anyone able to answer this question please? The answer seems to be yes. But it's simple and quick to get a Google account - what's the problem? For various reasons, I don't want to create a Google account and without doing that it would seem that all I can do is read not write. -- Alan White Mozilla Firefox and Forte Agent. By Loch Long, twenty-eight miles NW of Glasgow, Scotland. Webcam and weather:- http://windycroft.co.uk/weather |
Your invitation to join...
In message ,
Weatherlawyer writes Very kind of you but I am not interested in something set up for a bunch of lying crackpots. Sorry. Don't get me wrong, I do hope you prosper but I can't see god blessing anything based on political lies. Based on political lies? It would probably be wiser of me not to ask, but where on earth do you get that idea from? The only stipulations that Bruce has made are that posts should be on-topic - i.e. about the weather or climate - and should not be abusive. Both of those requirements seem perfectly reasonable. Yes, they would exclude discussion of politics, but why should a forum about the weather be a suitable place for that? -- John Hall "Banking was conceived in iniquity and born in sin" attributed to Sir Josiah Stamp, a former director of the Bank of England |
Your invitation to join...
On 03/07/2016 18:10, John Hall wrote:
In message , Weatherlawyer writes Very kind of you but I am not interested in something set up for a bunch of lying crackpots. Sorry. Don't get me wrong, I do hope you prosper but I can't see god blessing anything based on political lies. Based on political lies? It would probably be wiser of me not to ask, but where on earth do you get that idea from? The only stipulations that Bruce has made are that posts should be on-topic - i.e. about the weather or climate - and should not be abusive. Both of those requirements seem perfectly reasonable. Yes, they would exclude discussion of politics, but why should a forum about the weather be a suitable place for that? I despaired the same way I despaired when I saw this... https://twitter.com/NORBET/status/749568078153912320 -- Keith (Southend) "Weather Home & Abroad" http://www.southendweather.net Twitter:@SS9Weatherman |
Your invitation to join...
On Sunday, 3 July 2016 18:28:09 UTC+1, Keith (Southend)G wrote:
On 03/07/2016 18:10, John Hall wrote: In message , Weatherlawyer writes Very kind of you but I am not interested in something set up for a bunch of lying crackpots. Sorry. Don't get me wrong, I do hope you prosper but I can't see god blessing anything based on political lies. Based on political lies? It would probably be wiser of me not to ask, but where on earth do you get that idea from? The only stipulations that Bruce has made are that posts should be on-topic - i.e. about the weather or climate - and should not be abusive. Both of those requirements seem perfectly reasonable. Yes, they would exclude discussion of politics, but why should a forum about the weather be a suitable place for that? I despaired the same way I despaired when I saw this... https://twitter.com/NORBET/status/749568078153912320 -- Keith (Southend) "Weather Home & Abroad" http://www.southendweather.net Twitter:@SS9Weatherman Keith I don't mean to be rude but as someone who is always eager to say how this newsgroup has deteriorated and indeed have expressed your enthusiasm for a 'moderated NG where only weather is raised, don't you think then that you should give some sort of a lead and stop going on about Brexit. Now you are perfectly entitled to go as OT as you want but please don't be so sanctimonious about it. By the way BREXIT won REMAIN lost. We know have to get on with it . Markets have recovered and doomsday so far hasn't happened. Sorry again if that seems a tad contentious but either you want to allow OT posts or not? |
Your invitation to join...
On Sunday, 3 July 2016 17:03:41 UTC+1, Metman2012 wrote:
On 03/07/2016 10:52, Alan White wrote: Do I need to create a Google account to join? Is anyone able to answer this question please? You should link your account to Google and create a throwaway that you onlu use to sign into Google's network. Or you should et an email with google because you want to make the use of an account you can comment to Youtube with store articles on Google docs and work with other users to create whatever. And you should get an address to get the 15 GB of storage free. But if you have to join a network you don't want so you can post on a forum? Get an different forum you ned. |
Your invitation to join...
On Sunday, 3 July 2016 18:15:27 UTC+1, John Hall wrote:
In message , Weatherlawyer writes Very kind of you but I am not interested in something set up for a bunch of lying crackpots. Sorry. Don't get me wrong, I do hope you prosper but I can't see god blessing anything based on political lies. Based on political lies? It would probably be wiser of me not to ask, but where on earth do you get that idea from? The only stipulations that Bruce has made are that posts should be on-topic - i.e. about the weather or climate - and should not be abusive. Both of those requirements seem perfectly reasonable. Yes, they would exclude discussion of politics, but why should a forum about the weather be a suitable place for that? I take it that you haven't read anything I have posted on here recently, because all my Youtube links have been about the abuse of science (and physics in particular) by the flowerpots of the IPCC. I would suggest that you go and read some of them or am I in your killfilters? If I am then that is your problem not my problem. My problem is that I don't keep a score on posters I reply to. If they don't respond I think they don't respond because they don't want to, not because I am filtered out. If they want to do that I really don't mind. The problem is I am supposed to know what they don't know? They can **** off! See if I care. I can't imagine using a forum where anyone is filtered out. Why would you want to be a part of a fraction of a discussion? Stupid or what? |
Your invitation to join...
On Sunday, 3 July 2016 19:01:33 UTC+1, Lawrence Jenkins wrote:
On Sunday, 3 July 2016 18:28:09 UTC+1, Keith (Southend)G wrote: On 03/07/2016 18:10, John Hall wrote: In message , Weatherlawyer writes Very kind of you but I am not interested in something set up for a bunch of lying crackpots. Sorry. Don't get me wrong, I do hope you prosper but I can't see god blessing anything based on political lies. Based on political lies? It would probably be wiser of me not to ask, but where on earth do you get that idea from? The only stipulations that Bruce has made are that posts should be on-topic - i.e. about the weather or climate - and should not be abusive. Both of those requirements seem perfectly reasonable. Yes, they would exclude discussion of politics, but why should a forum about the weather be a suitable place for that? I despaired the same way I despaired when I saw this... https://twitter.com/NORBET/status/749568078153912320 -- Keith (Southend) "Weather Home & Abroad" http://www.southendweather.net Twitter:@SS9Weatherman Keith I don't mean to be rude but as someone who is always eager to say how this newsgroup has deteriorated and indeed have expressed your enthusiasm for a 'moderated NG where only weather is raised, don't you think then that you should give some sort of a lead and stop going on about Brexit. Now you are perfectly entitled to go as OT as you want but please don't be so sanctimonious about it. By the way BREXIT won REMAIN lost. We know have to get on with it. Markets have recovered and doomsday so far hasn't happened. Sorry again if that seems a tad contentious but either you want to allow OT posts or not? Are you absolutely sure it IS keith and not KNOW but now. |
Your invitation to join...
"Alan White" wrote in message ... On Sun, 3 Jul 2016 17:14:49 +0100, "JohnD" wrote: "Metman2012" wrote in message ... On 03/07/2016 10:52, Alan White wrote: Do I need to create a Google account to join? Is anyone able to answer this question please? The answer seems to be yes. But it's simple and quick to get a Google account - what's the problem? For various reasons, I don't want to create a Google account and without doing that it would seem that all I can do is read not write. =========================== Pathetic. Most weather bulletin boards allow you to read posts without joining anything. Eg UKWW. I don't have a Google account either, why should I. Google seem intent on taking over the whole bloomin net with their tentacles. Will -- " Some sects believe that the world was created 5000 years ago. Another sect believes that it was created in 1910 " http://www.lyneside.demon.co.uk/Hayt...antage_Pro.htm Will Hand (Haytor, Devon, 1017 feet asl) --------------------------------------------- |
Your invitation to join...
On Sunday, 3 July 2016 19:19:43 UTC+1, wrote:
"Alan White" wrote in message ... On Sun, 3 Jul 2016 17:14:49 +0100, "JohnD" wrote: "Metman2012" wrote in message ... On 03/07/2016 10:52, Alan White wrote: Do I need to create a Google account to join? Is anyone able to answer this question please? The answer seems to be yes. But it's simple and quick to get a Google account - what's the problem? For various reasons, I don't want to create a Google account and without doing that it would seem that all I can do is read not write. Pathetic. Most weather bulletin boards allow you to read posts without joining anything. Eg UKWW. I don't have a Google account either, why should I. Google seem intent on taking over the whole bloomin net with their tentacles. Why do you suppose we were willing to waste all that money on fraud in the EU? All the youkay has accomplished in reasserting independence is freeing Teresa May to do what she always wanted with GCHQ. Or were you being disingenuous? |
All times are GMT. The time now is 11:08 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2006 WeatherBanter.co.uk