On 3 Sep, 00:58, Hatunen wrote:
On Wed, 01 Sep 2010 19:46:38 -0700, Meh
wrote:
On Wed, 1 Sep 2010 19:34:09 -0700 (PDT), kolldata
wrote:

As you know hurricane name lists are predicted years in advance.

As I ALSO know, this is an earthquake newsgroup, not hurricane.

But convergence in the atmosphere directly affects divergence in the
earth and vice versa. (Which is to say when the convergence in the
atmosphere ends, the return to normal will be accompanied with a
suitable seismic bang at a point (or several) not much more or less
than 80 degrees distant from what would be the meteorological
equivalent of epicentre.

Consider:
http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquak...us2010ata9.php
and compare to the weather charts for the coast of SW USA the previous
day. Artfully predicted by yrs troolie.)

And the names aren't "predicted", they're adopted years in
advance. I mean it's not like the hurricane comes with a label or
something and we don't find out its name till we see the label.

But when you are so sure of something that it is not a matter of
faith, isn't it still a prediction until the actual occurrence?

I suppose I'd better look after any following sheep:

Earthquake Details
This event has been reviewed by a seismologist.
Magnitude 6.3
Date-Time Friday, September 03, 2010 at 11:16:08 UTC
Friday, September 03, 2010 at 02:16:08 AM at epicenter
Time of Earthquake in other Time Zones

Location 51.785°N, 176.010°W
Depth 50.8 km (31.6 miles)
Region ANDREANOF ISLANDS, ALEUTIAN IS., ALASKA
Distances 45 km (30 miles) E of Adak, Alaska
130 km (80 miles) WSW of Atka, Alaska
1905 km (1180 miles) WSW of Anchorage, Alaska
2715 km (1680 miles) W of JUNEAU, Alaska

Location Uncertainty horizontal +/- 6.7 km (4.2 miles); depth +/- 4.2
km (2.6 miles)
Parameters NST=242, Nph=250, Dmin=505.4 km, Rmss=0.77 sec, Gp= 79°,
M-type=teleseismic moment magnitude (Mw), Version=6
Source USGS NEIC (WDCS-D)


Event ID us2010ata9

You'll have to look for NCAR sites for a meteorological chart for the
relevant day.
WetterZentrale might oblige. (Not sure.)

I'm taken aback by the whole thing. Great Winsocki ! Clemens' numbers
are my numbers unless someone is pulling my leg.

And do not record past in stone, only proceed.

Yes. 'free will' is exercised and often non-rational aside from your
ignorance for a 'sure thing.'

Relevancy is often a side factor. For example, I write a humor thing
in .liberalism under SLIME.
Tracking Danielle/Earl I wanted to SLIME TOMORROW with Beach Boys
lyrics from 'Safari' but shyed from that as it wasn't relevant.
Duhduhduh.

Experimenting with BTG at Fort Myers/FM Beach, I discovered the
grackles did not appreciate quantitative thinking. These birds get
used to QT but seem to tolerate only. Speaking english is deafinitly
out. You maynhave a similar problem with your naybor the

Speaking of which, first glance at USGS Records doesn't yeild
dorections to a non geek. The weather people do the same. One needs an
intern with time to present access. WTH

The Orca should be great fun and adventure.

I'm trying to present a scientific approach for the Feds while Orca
are running me down communicating.

maybe you could buy a parrot !