sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) (sci.geo.meteorology) For the discussion of meteorology and related topics.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old December 27th 16, 03:47 AM posted to sci.geo.meteorology
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Apr 2006
Posts: 25
Default Bigfoot, Church Ladies, and Pixie Dust

One simple observation that proves I'm right and the convection model is
wrong: storms and directed, concentrated low pressure are observationally
correlated.

Conversely, there is zero reliable, non-anecdotal evidence of expansiveness
and buoyancy playing a role in storms. Or, I should say, the observational
data that it does exist can best be described as being much more frequent
than but equally as anecdotal as that associated with big foot sightings.

(Note: Bigfoot is not generally associated with pixies or pixie dust.)

More simply put, if the convection model was correct then storms would be
correlated with high pressure. They aren't. The belief--church ladies not
withstanding--that it does has nothing to do with science and everything to
do with group delusion.

And so, in a sense, atmospheric flow isn't pushed, it is pulled. Jet
streams are the source of the concentrated and directed low pressure that
pulls the rest of the atmosphere along. The properties (poorly understood)
of water under wind shear conditions are instrumental to the emergence of
the plasma (plainly viewable as the sheath of a tornado) that provides the
leverage (structural) that facilitates all of the above, through vortices
that provide their fast moving contents (air flowing, sometimes, at speeds
upwards of 300 mph) isolation from the friction of the atmosphere and, at
one and the same time, provides the upper troposphere the means by which it,
essentially maintains its grip on the lower troposphere and, simultaneously,
stays hydrated. (Fortunately for ourselves and all other land based animals,
it ["it" being, essentially, the jet stream{s}] is a sloppy drinker.)

Convection plays no role what-so-ever!!!

The convection model is a cartoon based on fictional physical principles
that the underlying basis of which bigfoot, church ladies, and pixie dust.

James McGinn
Solving Tornadoes

See my books on Amazon
Search: James McGinn Solving Tornadoes

  #2   Report Post  
Old January 11th 17, 04:34 PM posted to sci.geo.meteorology
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Apr 2006
Posts: 25
Default Bigfoot, Church Ladies, and Pixie Dust

On Monday, December 26, 2016 at 7:47:34 PM UTC-8, Jim McGinn wrote:
One simple observation that proves I'm right and the convection model is
wrong: storms and directed, concentrated low pressure are observationally
correlated.

Conversely, there is zero reliable, non-anecdotal evidence of expansiveness
and buoyancy playing a role in storms. Or, I should say, the observational
data that it does exist can best be described as being much more frequent
than but equally as anecdotal as that associated with big foot sightings.

(Note: Bigfoot is not generally associated with pixies or pixie dust.)

More simply put, if the convection model was correct then storms would be
correlated with high pressure. They aren't. The belief--church ladies not
withstanding--that it does has nothing to do with science and everything to
do with group delusion.

And so, in a sense, atmospheric flow isn't pushed, it is pulled. Jet
streams are the source of the concentrated and directed low pressure that
pulls the rest of the atmosphere along. The properties (poorly understood)
of water under wind shear conditions are instrumental to the emergence of
the plasma (plainly viewable as the sheath of a tornado) that provides the
leverage (structural) that facilitates all of the above, through vortices
that provide their fast moving contents (air flowing, sometimes, at speeds
upwards of 300 mph) isolation from the friction of the atmosphere and, at
one and the same time, provides the upper troposphere the means by which it,
essentially maintains its grip on the lower troposphere and, simultaneously,
stays hydrated. (Fortunately for ourselves and all other land based animals,
it ["it" being, essentially, the jet stream{s}] is a sloppy drinker.)

Convection plays no role what-so-ever!!!

The convection model is a cartoon based on fictional physical principles
that the underlying basis of which bigfoot, church ladies, and pixie dust.

James McGinn
Solving Tornadoes

See my books on Amazon
Search: James McGinn Solving Tornadoes


hjb
  #3   Report Post  
Old February 15th 17, 06:29 PM posted to sci.geo.meteorology
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Apr 2006
Posts: 25
Default Bigfoot, Church Ladies, and Pixie Dust

On Monday, December 26, 2016 at 7:47:34 PM UTC-8, Jim McGinn wrote:
One simple observation that proves I'm right and the convection model is
wrong: storms and directed, concentrated low pressure are observationally
correlated.

Conversely, there is zero reliable, non-anecdotal evidence of expansiveness
and buoyancy playing a role in storms. Or, I should say, the observational
data that it does exist can best be described as being much more frequent
than but equally as anecdotal as that associated with big foot sightings.

(Note: Bigfoot is not generally associated with pixies or pixie dust.)

More simply put, if the convection model was correct then storms would be
correlated with high pressure. They aren't. The belief--church ladies not
withstanding--that it does has nothing to do with science and everything to
do with group delusion.

And so, in a sense, atmospheric flow isn't pushed, it is pulled. Jet
streams are the source of the concentrated and directed low pressure that
pulls the rest of the atmosphere along. The properties (poorly understood)
of water under wind shear conditions are instrumental to the emergence of
the plasma (plainly viewable as the sheath of a tornado) that provides the
leverage (structural) that facilitates all of the above, through vortices
that provide their fast moving contents (air flowing, sometimes, at speeds
upwards of 300 mph) isolation from the friction of the atmosphere and, at
one and the same time, provides the upper troposphere the means by which it,
essentially maintains its grip on the lower troposphere and, simultaneously,
stays hydrated. (Fortunately for ourselves and all other land based animals,
it ["it" being, essentially, the jet stream{s}] is a sloppy drinker.)

Convection plays no role what-so-ever!!!

The convection model is a cartoon based on fictional physical principles
that the underlying basis of which bigfoot, church ladies, and pixie dust.

James McGinn
Solving Tornadoes

See my books on Amazon
Search: James McGinn Solving Tornadoes




Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
No fancy graphics, no pretty ladies and not a wasted penny in site Jim Cannon uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) 1 March 5th 13 01:02 AM
Gentlemen (and ladies), start your logs..... Skypilot uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) 7 September 21st 11 12:44 PM
Summer temperatures - Church Fenton / Church Lawford 25.7C Colin Youngs[_2_] uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) 1 July 29th 11 08:12 AM
Ladies and Gentlemen, lay your bets. lawrence Jenkins uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) 20 February 23rd 05 11:33 PM
Ladies watch with barometer function? Adrian D. Shaw uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) 0 December 11th 03 09:56 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:39 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2004-2017 Weather Banter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Weather"

 

Copyright © 2017