Weather Banter

Weather Banter (https://www.weather-banter.co.uk/)
-   sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) (https://www.weather-banter.co.uk/sci-geo-meteorology-meteorology/)
-   -   Have you noticed..... (https://www.weather-banter.co.uk/sci-geo-meteorology-meteorology/119508-have-you-noticed.html)

David November 7th 07 01:10 PM

Have you noticed.....
 
On Tue, 06 Nov 2007 08:17:54 -0700, Elephant wrote:

William Asher wrote:

SNIP


You people are very silly.


Explain, in detail, from first principles, how gravity works.



How gravity works:

1. You are fat. When I trip you, you hit the ground harder
2. I'm skinny. When you trip me, I don't hit the ground as hard as
you did.
3: I think I'll keep tripping you. It's fun to watch your fat hit the
ground!



Now, that explanation of gravity is just as stupid as the Global Warming
nonsense.

Twenty five years ago, the doom and gloomers were warning us to prepare
for the next ice age. Don't belive me, do a search for the New York
Times. I believe March of 1976.
They went on and on about the loss of crops due to extreme cold lasting
into June. Not enough fuel to heat our homes in the extreme frigid cold
about to hit the US. And on and on.............


25 years ago Bill Gates thought an operating system only needed 640 K
of RAM to function. People learn from their mistakes. Only religious
types cannot evolve.

David November 7th 07 01:11 PM

Have you noticed.....
 
On Tue, 06 Nov 2007 11:11:04 -0500, Crackles McFarly
wrote:

On Tue, 06 Nov 2007 08:17:54 -0700, Elephant sayd the
following:

Now, that explanation of gravity is just as stupid as the Global Warming
nonsense.


NOT just as stupid but rather MORE, much more, stupid than someone
explaining global warming.

99% of the keyboard heros on the NET think they understand global
warming, and 100% blame it on man's action.

It's too bad we WILL see a carbon tax on individual incomes within 5
years.. You all asked for this..


The Iraq War is a carbon tax.

Crackles McFarly November 7th 07 04:08 PM

Have you noticed.....
 
On Wed, 07 Nov 2007 06:10:42 -0800, David sayd the
following:

25 years ago Bill Gates thought an operating system only needed 640 K
of RAM to function.


But the OS at the TIME he made the statement did very well with 640K
of ram.

You're an idiot.


David November 8th 07 01:15 PM

Have you noticed.....
 
On Wed, 07 Nov 2007 12:08:36 -0500, Crackles McFarly
wrote:

On Wed, 07 Nov 2007 06:10:42 -0800, David sayd the
following:

25 years ago Bill Gates thought an operating system only needed 640 K
of RAM to function.


But the OS at the TIME he made the statement did very well with 640K
of ram.

You're an idiot.


But I can achieve greater objectivity because of it.

Crackles McFarly November 9th 07 03:46 PM

Have you noticed.....
 
On Thu, 08 Nov 2007 06:15:05 -0800, David sayd the
following:

On Wed, 07 Nov 2007 12:08:36 -0500, Crackles McFarly
wrote:

On Wed, 07 Nov 2007 06:10:42 -0800, David sayd the
following:

25 years ago Bill Gates thought an operating system only needed 640 K
of RAM to function.


But the OS at the TIME he made the statement did very well with 640K
of ram.

You're an idiot.


But I can achieve greater objectivity because of it.



Ok Mr. Liberal...objective? lol


David November 10th 07 01:41 PM

Have you noticed.....
 
On Fri, 09 Nov 2007 11:46:41 -0500, Crackles McFarly
wrote:

On Thu, 08 Nov 2007 06:15:05 -0800, David sayd the
following:

On Wed, 07 Nov 2007 12:08:36 -0500, Crackles McFarly
wrote:

On Wed, 07 Nov 2007 06:10:42 -0800, David sayd the
following:

25 years ago Bill Gates thought an operating system only needed 640 K
of RAM to function.

But the OS at the TIME he made the statement did very well with 640K
of ram.

You're an idiot.


But I can achieve greater objectivity because of it.



Ok Mr. Liberal...objective? lol


Libertarian anarchist actually...

You have built many barricades.


All times are GMT. The time now is 05:38 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2006 WeatherBanter.co.uk