On Wed, 25 Aug 2010 20:08:06 +0100, Alan LeHun wrote:

Mr Tibbs on the other hand is extremely bitter. It would appear that he
spends his life quietly seething at some perceived injustice


Poor exam results?

R

In message , Lawrence
Jenkins writes

Funny because because if someone gives a sceptical opinion on a AGW topic
when it often comes up, he's the first in there thowing out personal
insults. The truth is that most here can forecast and write reams on the
model output but a forecaster that does not make. Posting almost every day
about the various models seems an attempt to be taken seriously as a
forecaster without ever making a forecast.. Its a bit like someone trying
to be taken seriously as an aviation scientist because they watched a test
flight video on National Georgraphic .

By all means people can have a crack at a forecast but has Dullish ever made
a forecast and if he has has it been more then a week ahead. I don't want
to butter Will up but he will disagree with the models on occassion and be
proved right weeks aheadas well as wrong on some occassions.


So says the leader of the rightards. Dawlish at least keeps on topic.
Exactly what of relevance, or interest, do you bring to this WEATHER
newsgroup?

--


Jim

On Aug 26, 4:21*pm, Jim Kewley wrote:
In message , Lawrence
Jenkins writes



Funny because because if someone gives a sceptical opinion on a *AGW topic
when it often comes up, he's the first in there thowing out personal
insults. *The truth is that most here can forecast and write reams on the
model output but a forecaster that does not make. Posting almost every day
about the various models seems an attempt to be taken seriously as a
forecaster without ever making a forecast.. *Its a bit like someone trying
to be taken seriously as an aviation scientist because they watched a test
flight video on National Georgraphic .

By all means people can have a crack at a forecast but has Dullish ever made
a forecast and if he has has it been more then a week ahead. *I don't want
to butter Will up but he will disagree with the models on occassion and be
proved right weeks aheadas well as wrong on some occassions.

So says the leader of the rightards. *Dawlish at least keeps on topic.
Exactly what of relevance, or interest, *do you bring to this WEATHER
newsgroup?

--

Jim

Right on the money Jim.

On Aug 25, 9:00*pm, "Lawrence Jenkins" wrote:
"Dawlish" wrote in message

...
On Aug 25, 8:17 pm, Dawlish wrote:





On Aug 25, 6:04 pm, "Col" wrote:

Teignmouth wrote:
The problem is if Dawlish only forecasts when all the models agree at
T240 (which is very rarely), what happens all the other times?

I’m off to Manchester on 4th September to watch Muse play in an open
air arena at Lanchashire Country Cricket Ground, I need to know
whether I need to purchase a full on Sou’wester, a pac-a-mac, shorts &
Tshirt or sun cream?

It’s no good saying, I can’t provide you with a forecast today because
the models don’t agree.

As somebody else pointed out, that would only be a problem if he
was providing a professional paid-for service. No good then
crying off if it's too difficult

But he's not.
He's just lookng for those times when the models show consistency
at 10 days. No more, no less.
--
Col

Bolton, Lancashire
160m asl

And cross model agreement Col. Consistency in just one model isn't
enough.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Nothing in the models today to change my view of an end to the cololer
and wetter weather and a return to summery conditions in the medium-
term. A change could come, but I'm 75% confident of this happening.
Wish I was going to see Muse; the concert in Teignmouth last year was
one of *the* gigs of the year anywhere, by anyone, but you might not
need the brolly and the thermal vest, T.

"Cololer" is that a water bourne infectious bacteria?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

*)) ......... but I always find that, if you are going to highlight
and criticise someone's typo, it is best to do it with accurate
spelling *))

"Jim Kewley" wrote in message
...
In message , Lawrence Jenkins
writes

Funny because because if someone gives a sceptical opinion on a AGW topic
when it often comes up, he's the first in there thowing out personal
insults. The truth is that most here can forecast and write reams on the
model output but a forecaster that does not make. Posting almost every day
about the various models seems an attempt to be taken seriously as a
forecaster without ever making a forecast.. Its a bit like someone trying
to be taken seriously as an aviation scientist because they watched a test
flight video on National Georgraphic .

By all means people can have a crack at a forecast but has Dullish ever
made
a forecast and if he has has it been more then a week ahead. I don't want
to butter Will up but he will disagree with the models on occassion and be
proved right weeks aheadas well as wrong on some occassions.


So says the leader of the rightards. Dawlish at least keeps on topic.
Exactly what of relevance, or interest, do you bring to this WEATHER
newsgroup?

--


Jim

Jim that's not very nice especially after that very nice email you sent me .

"Dawlish" wrote in message
...
On Aug 25, 9:00 pm, "Lawrence Jenkins" wrote:
"Dawlish" wrote in message

...
On Aug 25, 8:17 pm, Dawlish wrote:





On Aug 25, 6:04 pm, "Col" wrote:

Teignmouth wrote:
The problem is if Dawlish only forecasts when all the models agree
at
T240 (which is very rarely), what happens all the other times?

I’m off to Manchester on 4th September to watch Muse play in an open
air arena at Lanchashire Country Cricket Ground, I need to know
whether I need to purchase a full on Sou’wester, a pac-a-mac, shorts
&
Tshirt or sun cream?

It’s no good saying, I can’t provide you with a forecast today
because
the models don’t agree.

As somebody else pointed out, that would only be a problem if he
was providing a professional paid-for service. No good then
crying off if it's too difficult

But he's not.
He's just lookng for those times when the models show consistency
at 10 days. No more, no less.
--
Col

Bolton, Lancashire
160m asl

And cross model agreement Col. Consistency in just one model isn't
enough.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Nothing in the models today to change my view of an end to the cololer
and wetter weather and a return to summery conditions in the medium-
term. A change could come, but I'm 75% confident of this happening.
Wish I was going to see Muse; the concert in Teignmouth last year was
one of *the* gigs of the year anywhere, by anyone, but you might not
need the brolly and the thermal vest, T.

"Cololer" is that a water bourne infectious bacteria?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

*)) ......... but I always find that, if you are going to highlight
and criticise someone's typo, it is best to do it with accurate
spelling *))


One bourne every minute

Dawlish wrote:
On Aug 25, 6:04 pm, "Col" wrote:


But he's not.
He's just lookng for those times when the models show consistency
at 10 days. No more, no less.
--
Col

Bolton, Lancashire
160m asl

And cross model agreement Col. Consistency in just one model isn't
enough.

Well yes indeed, that's why I said model*s*, i.e.the plural as
in consistency between them.
--
Col

Bolton, Lancashire
160m asl

Alan LeHun wrote:
In article e4b35eb1-3c01-4225-b4bf-4c7e5d0b26b1
@z28g2000yqh.googlegroups.com, says...

I haven't smiled so much in ages in an appreciation of wonderful
irony, keep it up - and thanks very much.



It could be said that Dawlish is somewhat arrogant, perhaps a little
conceited. That's fair enough, we all have our faults, although it
certainly appears that for Paul, the world revolves around Dawlish.

He is most certainly an abrasive chracter and by his own admission
'says what he wants'. Which is fine of course, but it does tend to
lead to arguments
I've had a couple with him myself, but once it's over there's no hard
feelings and cetainly no long term grudges or feuding.
--
Col

Bolton, Lancashire
160m asl

On Aug 26, 5:49*pm, "Col" wrote:
Alan LeHun wrote:
In article e4b35eb1-3c01-4225-b4bf-4c7e5d0b26b1
@z28g2000yqh.googlegroups.com, says...

I haven't smiled so much in ages in an appreciation of wonderful
irony, keep it up - and thanks very much.

It could be said that Dawlish is somewhat arrogant, perhaps a little
conceited. That's fair enough, we all have our faults, although it
certainly appears that for Paul, the world revolves around Dawlish.

He is most certainly an abrasive chracter and by his own admission
'says what he wants'. Which is fine of course, but it does tend to
lead to arguments
I've had a couple with him myself, but once it's over there's no hard
feelings and cetainly no long term grudges or feuding.
--
Col

Bolton, Lancashire
160m asl

True.

Whatever the ins and outs of the above, there's nothing on the models
to change my mind about my forecast for the 3rd. HIgh pressure should
have established itself across the UK on Bank Holiday monday ending
the period of cooler and wetter weather that is plaguing the south of
the UK currently.

****ing einstein tonight eh.

bigot


On 26/08/2010 9:08 PM, Dawlish wrote:
wetter weather that is plaguing the south of
the UK currently.