Accuweather
http://global-warming.accuweather.co...rd_over_t.html

David Christainsen - Meteorologist

On Jul 3, 4:16*pm, crunch wrote:
Accuweatherhttp://global-warming.accuweather.com/2009/07/itcz_creeping_northward...

David Christainsen - Meteorologist

So? The climate started changing dramatically about 150 years ago.
This is not news to us on alt. global-warming.

On Fri, 03 Jul 2009 07:16:18 -0700, crunch wrote:

Accuweather
http://global-warming.accuweather.com/2009/07/
itcz_creeping_northward_over_t.html

David Christainsen - Meteorologist

OK. I agree with you and your link. However, how does this relate to man-
made global warming. Don't believe we had very many automobles, a/c
units, cattle (compared to today) or other things being blamed for
today's problems. Seems to me, and to a lot of people in the scientific
community, that we are dealing with natural cycles in the earth's
climate. But as usual, those on the left NEVER look at it that way. It is
always caused by man.

On Fri, 03 Jul 2009 07:21:42 -0700, John M. wrote:

On Jul 3, 4:16Â*pm, crunch wrote:
Accuweatherhttp://global-warming.accuweather.com/2009/07/
itcz_creeping_northward...

David Christainsen - Meteorologist

So? The climate started changing dramatically about 150 years ago. This
is not news to us on alt. global-warming.

Once again, ther was not much industry or man made products 150 years
ago, so why does man get the blame?

On Fri, 03 Jul 2009 11:32:41 -0500, Ken Marino wrote:

On Fri, 03 Jul 2009 07:16:18 -0700, crunch wrote:

Accuweather
http://global-warming.accuweather.com/2009/07/
itcz_creeping_northward_over_t.html

David Christainsen - Meteorologist

OK. I agree with you and your link. However, how does this relate to
man- made global warming. Don't believe we had very many automobles, a/c
units, cattle (compared to today) or other things being blamed for
today's problems. Seems to me, and to a lot of people in the scientific
community, that we are dealing with natural cycles in the earth's
climate. But as usual, those on the left NEVER look at it that way. It
is always caused by man.

Well of course.

How could they tax nature?

On Jul 3, 9:34*am, Ken Marino wrote:
On Fri, 03 Jul 2009 07:21:42 -0700, John M. wrote:
On Jul 3, 4:16*pm, crunch wrote:
Accuweatherhttp://global-warming.accuweather.com/2009/07/

itcz_creeping_northward...



David Christainsen - Meteorologist

So? The climate started changing dramatically about 150 years ago. This
is not news to us on alt. global-warming.

Once again, ther was not much industry or man made products 150 years
ago, so why does man get the blame?

Steam locomotives were the rage in the 1850's

On Jul 3, 1:18*pm, richp wrote:
On Jul 3, 9:34*am, Ken Marino wrote:

On Fri, 03 Jul 2009 07:21:42 -0700, John M. wrote:
On Jul 3, 4:16*pm, crunch wrote:
Accuweatherhttp://global-warming.accuweather.com/2009/07/

itcz_creeping_northward...

David Christainsen - Meteorologist

So? The climate started changing dramatically about 150 years ago. This
is not news to us on alt. global-warming.

Once again, ther was not much industry or man made products 150 years
ago, so why does man get the blame?

Steam locomotives were the rage in the 1850's

Yep, it's because of the steam locomotives. There had to be about two
or three hundred of them in the world back then.

Our fault again. :-(

Wait !!!! the article says:

"ITCZ Creeping Northward over the Past 300 Years"

How many steam locomotives were there 200 and 300 years ago??????

On Fri, 3 Jul 2009 07:16:18 -0700 (PDT), crunch
wrote:

Accuweather
http://global-warming.accuweather.co...rd_over_t.html

David Christainsen - Meteorologist

Isn't there two of those, one north and one south?

On Jul 3, 10:35*am, Peter Muehlbauer
wrote:
richp wrote:
On Jul 3, 9:34*am, Ken Marino wrote:
On Fri, 03 Jul 2009 07:21:42 -0700, John M. wrote:
On Jul 3, 4:16*pm, crunch wrote:
Accuweatherhttp://global-warming.accuweather.com/2009/07/

itcz_creeping_northward...

David Christainsen - Meteorologist

So? The climate started changing dramatically about 150 years ago. This
is not news to us on alt. global-warming.

Once again, ther was not much industry or man made products 150 years
ago, so why does man get the blame?

Steam locomotives were the rage in the 1850's

Yes, and there were millions of them, eh?
Idiot.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Conservatives in a debate tend to do crap like this "Steam locomotives
were the rage in the 1850's

Yes, and there were millions of them, eh?
Idiot"

I never said that and why do you want to put words in my mouth. I
really don't appreciate that you friggin bully

On Jul 3, 9:53*pm, Peter Muehlbauer
wrote:
richp wrote:
On Jul 3, 10:35*am, Peter Muehlbauer
wrote:
richp wrote:
On Jul 3, 9:34*am, Ken Marino wrote:
On Fri, 03 Jul 2009 07:21:42 -0700, John M. wrote:
On Jul 3, 4:16*pm, crunch wrote:
Accuweatherhttp://global-warming.accuweather.com/2009/07/

itcz_creeping_northward...

David Christainsen - Meteorologist

So? The climate started changing dramatically about 150 years ago. This
is not news to us on alt. global-warming.

Once again, ther was not much industry or man made products 150 years
ago, so why does man get the blame?

Steam locomotives were the rage in the 1850's

Yes, and there were millions of them, eh?
Idiot.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Conservatives in a debate tend to do crap like this "Steam locomotives
were the rage in the 1850's

Yes, and there were millions of them, eh?
Idiot"

I never said that and why do you want to put words in my mouth. *I
really don't appreciate that you friggin bully

I see, you find an excuse on every **** you post, even if it is off topic..
Better you STFU next time before some diarrhea is leaving your mouth.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -